MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893913954 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6229065

Cultroribula berolina

2008· article· en· W6893913954 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOribatidaLitterGermanClearingCosmopolitan distributionTaxonomy (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

[Re-description of Cultroribula berolina Weigmann, 2006] 1. Introduction In the course of a taxonomical revision of Central European oribatid mites, which resulted in a text book on German Oribatida (Weigmann 2006), the species Cultroribula berolina Weigmann, 2006 (Astegistidae) was described briefly, based on a single female specimen from a forest in Berlin. Recognition of this species only became possible with a modern re-description of C. juncta (Michael, 1885) (Luxton 1987, Weigmann 2006) and discussions on morphology and distribution of C. confinis Berlese, 1908. Probably, C. berolina has been confused in the past with each of the former species which have been described incompletely and in part incorrectly. To clarify this is the object of the discussion below. Now, further specimens of C. berolina are available, which allows more detailed studies as well as comparison with its congeners. 2. Materials and methods The type specimen was collected in the litter layer on acidic sandy soil of a pine-oak-stand in the Grunewald Forest of Berlin, Jagen 24 (52°28' N, 13°13' E); collected by Dorothee Gehring 21 April 1990. (In 1992, at the time of the her diploma thesis, the species’ identity was uncertain because a modern re-description of C. juncta was not available). Two further specimens were collected in the litter layer on acidic sandy soil of a pine-oak-stand in Bärenklau Forest near Oranienburg, north of Berlin, 13 May 1991. The mites were extracted using a modified MacFadyen apparatus. The specimens were stored in ethanol and after clearing they were studied in lactic acid in open hollow-ground microscope slides. A series of collections was made by Georgia Erdmann, Görlitz, at the bark of oak trees near Görlitz in Germany (Klosterwald Marienthal at Ostritz, March 2005); one slide with two mounted specimens has been studied by me and is now deposited in my collection. Further specimens are deposited in the collection of the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz The terminology of morphological structures follows van der Hammen (1980) and Weigmann (2006). 3. Re-description of Cultroribula berolina Weigmann, 2006 Figs 1, 2 Diagnosis: Body length 255 - 285 µm; rostrum with two very narrow incisions medial to rostral setae, dividing rostral apex into three teeth; lateral anterior edge of rostrum with two further very small teeth; lamellar complex as typical for the genus: lamellae moderately broad, joined medially; cusps long, moderately broad, rounded tip bearing lamellar setae, space between cusps very narrow. Tutorium long, posteriorly a rounded blade, anteriorly with long acute tip. Sensillus with elongated claviform, with short stalk. Shoulder blade of notogaster distinct; notogaster long-ovoid; with 10 pairs of fine setae. No specific characters on ventral side. Legs with 1 claw. General characters: Body length 255 - 285 µm (five females studied); type specimen 280 µm in length, 147 µm in width. Colour pale yellow; cuticle of ventral plate with fine longitudinal striation, notogaster with similar striation, but very indistinct. Prodorsum: Rostrum with two very narrow incisions medial to rostral setae; incisions about 8 µm long, divide rostral tip into three triangular teeth; lateral anterior edge of rostrum with two further very small teeth, best visible in lateral view (Fig. 2). Lamellae moderately broad, converging and joining antero-medially; cavity present below lamellar blades in posterior part, near bothridia; cusps long, moderately broad, rounded tips bearing lamellar setae, space between cusps very narrow (Fig. 1). Tutoria long, posteriorly formed as rounded blade, anteriorly with long, acute cusps (Fig. 2). Sensilli claviform, with elongated, granulated heads and short stalks. Rostral and lamellar setae strong, setiform with distinct setulae; interlamellar setae short and fine (about 15-20 µm length); small exobothridial setae located below bothridia and above large pedotecta I. Notogaster: Shape ovoid; anterior border of notogaster convex, humeral corners with distinct, protruding small shoulder blades (Fig. 1). With 10 pairs of fine setae (length about 10-13 µm); anterior-most setae on shoulder blades, presumably representing setae c3; setae lm and lp in centro-dorsal positions. Opisthonotal glands hardly visible. Five pairs of notogastral slit sense organs present. Ventral region: Structure normal for the genus, without specific characters. Epimeral setal formula 3-1-3-3; with transverse grooves (‘taenidium’) between epimeres IV and ventral plate, as typical of family. Genital and anal plates large, only slightly separated; five pairs of fine genital setae, one pair of aggenital setae, two pairs of anal setae, three pairs of adanal setae. Legs: With 1 claw. Type material: The female holotype is mounted in a slide in Berlese liquid, deposited in the collection of the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz. Etymology: This species name relates to the Latin name of Berlin. 4. Discussion Ghilarov & Krivolutsky (1975) listed eight species of Cultroribula in the Palaearctic region, most of them reported without critical comments, based on the original descriptions: none of the species is similar to C. berolina. Subías (2007) listed 25 species worldwide, five of them with European distribution: the type species C. juncta (Michael, 1885), C. bicultrata (Berlese, 1905), C. confinis Berlese, 1908, C. tridentata Mihelčič, 1958, and C. berolina. Further species with European origin were described, but are junior synonyms or were recently transferred to other genera, e.g., C. dentata Willmann, 1950. In the case of C. tridentata Mihelčič, 1958, which was originally reported from Carinthia, southern Austria, the description is too poor to decide even its genus: the number of claws, the position of notogastral setae and other important details are absent from the description (Mihelčič 1958); the body length of 580 - 620 µm would be extreme within Cultroribula and clearly gives reason to reject synonymy with C. berolina. In contrast to C. berolina and other congeners, some species have tridactylous legs. Cultroribula dentata Willmann, 1950, was originally recorded from the Ukraine (Lubien Wielki; Willmann 1950). Similar in size, about 320 µm, it clearly differs from C. berolina by its tridactylous claws, longer interlamellar setae and having about 7 pairs of teeth on the anterior edge of the rostrum. Bayartogtokh (2007) re-described C. dentata from Mongolian soils with some minor conflicts with the original description regarding small teeth at the cusp tips, more numerous teeth on the rostral edge, and a body length of about 310 - 335 µm. The species is reported from Finland, the Ukraine, European Russia to Siberia, China and Mongolia, and from Alaska and Canada (see Ghilarov & Krivolutsky 1975, Marshall et al. 1987, Bayartogtokh 2007). Cultroribula vtorovi Krivolutsky, 1971, redescribed by Bayartogtokh (2007). It is similar to C. dentata, but has only three pairs of lateral teeth on the anterior edge of the rostrum in addition to the distal three teeth, has distal teeth on the lamellar cusps, and a body length of about 340 µm (Ghilarov & Krivolutsky 1975) or 305 - 320 µm (Bayartogtokh 2007). Mahunka (1983) created the subgenus Mexicoppia under Furcoppia with the type species F. (M.) hauseri Mahunka, 1983; this species from Mexico very much resembles C. vtorovi (same rostral teeth, same cusp), but is larger (about 360 - 390 µm in length). Subías (2004) listed these three species within Furcoribula (Mexicoppia), but in my opinion the morphological contrast to classical Furcoppia species is greater than to classical Cultroribula species. The taxon Mexicoppia needs critical revision. The genus type species C. juncta (Michael, 1885) was poorly known in morphological respect until the type was studied by Luxton (1987) and the species re-described by Weigmann (2006). Earlier records are based on the original description of Michael (1885 and 1888), or on information in Willmann (1931), Sellnick (1960) or Ghilarov & Krivolutsky (1975), none of which is sufficient for modern taxonomy. All of these references report the species to be monodactylous. However, Luxton (1987) re-described the type as heterotridactylous; he reported the number of notogastal setae as 12 pairs, erroneously, instead of the correct number of 10 pairs. The unpublished studies of Kunst, including his study of type material from the British Museum of Natural History, were the source for Fig. 381 in Ghilarov & Krivolutsky (1975) and also for some information obtained from Ladislav Miko, who helped me with the re-description of C. juncta (Weigmann 2006), which was based on German specimens that are deposited in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz and originally labelled as ' C. confinis '. The main characters of C. juncta in contrast to C. berolina are the following: incisions of rostral tip very short, so that three anterior rostral teeth are very short and hardly visible in dorsal aspect; interlamellar setae very short; tutoria without free acute tip; 10 pairs of notogastral setae short, mostly less than 10 µm long; notogaster shape at the shoulder region broader than in berolina; body length 235 - 280 µm; and heterotridactylous legs, of which the lateral claws are very thin. The only record of C. juncta referred to by Willmann (1931) was from mosses on the bark of trees, collected in former Eastern Prussia, now Western Russia. Probably, this record of a monodactylous Cultroribula refers to C. berolina, which was collected recently by Georgia Erdmann (Görlitz) from tree bark (see 2. Materials and methods). This habitat may be the ecological preference of the latter species which therefore seems to be very rare in collections from forest litter. Certainly, all records in the Palaearctic outside the British Isles and in the Nearctic (see Marshall et al. 1987) are determined after older text books require critical revision. Three mon

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→Travaux en français237 207→