MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893974625 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6071910

Deinopteroloma minor Shavrin & Smetana, sp.n.

2016· article· en· W6893974625 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeParatypeAedeagusDorsumArthropod mouthpartsApex (geometry)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Deinopteroloma minor Shavrin & Smetana, sp.n. (Figs. 3, 12, 18, 30−31, 47, 54, 61, 65−66) Type material examined: Holotype Ƌ [plastic plate with aedeagus and apical abdominal segment in Canadian balsam was pinned under the plate with beetle]: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, \ EmeiShan, N 29°32ʹ57.2ʹʹ \ E103°20ʹ37.7ʹʹ, \ 16.vi.2010, 2289m, \ sifting35, V.Grebennikov ” [rectangular printed label], “ HOLOTYPE \ Deinopteroloma \ minor sp. n. \ Shavrin A.V. & Smetana A. des. 2016” [red rectangular printed label] (NSMT). Paratypes (19 specimens): 5 Ƌ, 6 ♀: same data as the holotype (3 Ƌ, 4 ♀: NSMT; 2 Ƌ, 1 ♀: CSH; 1 ♀: BMNH); 3 Ƌ, 2 ♀: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, \ EmeiShan, N 29°32ʹ48.4ʹʹ \ E103°20ʹ06.3ʹʹ, \ 17.vi.2010, 2342m, \ sifting36, V.Grebennikov ” (NSMT); 1 Ƌ: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, \ EmeiShan, N 29°33ʹ36.3ʹʹ \ E103°20ʹ38.0ʹʹ, \ 15.vi.2010, 1947m, \ sifting33, V.Grebennikov ” (NSMT). All paratypes with additional red rectangular printed label: “ PARATYPE \ Deinopteroloma \ minor sp. n. \ Shavrin A.V. & Smetana A. des. 2016”. Description. Measurements (n=20): HW: 0.60−0.67; HL: 0.36−0.41; OL: 0.12−0.17; AL (holotype): 1.05; PL: 0.52−0.62; PW: 1.00−1.08; ElL: 1.27−1.47; EW: 1.22−1.33; AedL: 0.61−0.63; TL: 2.13−2.67 (holotype: 2.45). Body, mouthparts and legs yellowish brown to reddish brown, head reddish-brown to brown, with small dark brown spots on each side of clypeus above antennal insertion, elytra with variable, distinct or indistinct, brown Ushaped middle and apical maculae, some specimens only with indistinct middle macula or without it. Dorsal surface of body shiny, without microsculpture except lateral portions of clypeus with irregular transverse lines. Head (except clypeus) with very irregular deep punctation denser between ocelli, distinctly rugose and without interspaces on infraorbital ridges; disc of pronotum with large and deep very irregular punctation on middle elevation and with irregular, smaller punctation along posterior pronotal margin, sides of pronotum with sparse punctation denser in posterio-lateral portion; scutellum without or with few small indistinct punctures; punctation of elytra dense, distinctly larger and deeper than that on pronotum, disc of each elytron represented by 5−7 longitudinal rows of serial punctures, apical third of first two sutural rows of punctures and lateral punctation not serially arranged. Habitus as in Fig. 3. Head 1.6 times as wide as long; posterior part of clypeus and vertex with distinct irregular elevation, with posterior transverse, moderately deep impression in front of ocelli, infraorbital ridges slightly impressed between posteriolateral margins of each eye and ocellus; eyes moderately convex; small obtuse postocular ridge situated away from posterior margin of eye, distance slightly larger than twice the length of eye seen from above; ocelli moderately large, placed slightly lower than postocular ridges, distance between ocelli more than twice as large as distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Antenna reaching one-third of elytral length when reclined, with thickened antennomeres; measurements of antennomeres (length/width, holotype): 1: 0.15 × 0.07; 2: 0.10 × 0.05; 3: 0.10 × 0.03; 4: 0.08 × 0.05; 5: 0.09 × 0.05; 6−8: 0.08 × 0.05; 9−10: 0.08 × 0.06; 11: 0.13 × 0.07. Pronotum strongly transverse, 1.7−1.9 times as wide as long, 1.6 times wider than head; apical margin slightly narrower than posterior margin, anterior angles widely rounded, lateral margins with small crenulation, evenly narrowed both posteriad and anteriad, with moderately obtuse posterior angles; disc of pronotum with wide, very convex middle elevation with distinct longitudinal impression and with irregular wide impression in basal third; lateral portions of pronotum slightly reflexed, each with deep pit at middle. Elytra very convex and short, slightly longer than wide; surface of each elytron with distinct longitudinal sutural elevation and three discal elevations more expressed in first half of elytron; latero-apical portions of each elytron slightly explanated and reflexed. Male. First four protarsomeres slightly dilated. Front tibia vaguely dilated at about middle in lateral view. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII (Fig. 12) more or less straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII (Fig. 18) slightly sinuate. Aedeagus (Fig. 30) very long and narrow, median lobe in apical third gradually narrowed toward acute apex; parameres extremely long, significantly exceeding apex of median lobe, slightly asymmetrical: right paramere vaguely longer, with narrow acute apex; internal sac very gentle, without visible sclerotized structures. Aedeagus laterally as in Fig. 31. Female. First four protarsomeres not dilated. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII (Fig. 47) and sternite VIII (Fig. 54) rounded. Genital segment as in Fig. 61. Differential diagnosis. Based on the combination of pale coloration of the body, the shape of lateral margins of pronotum with dense and uniform crenulation and the elytra without very convex longitudinal elevations, D. minor is similar to D. chiangi and D. emeicola sp.n., but it differs by the smaller and wider body, coloration of the elytra, and by the completely different structure of the aedeagus. Deinopteroloma minor sp.n. differs from all congeners by its smaller size, wide and oval body, by the shape of the slightly explanated and reflexed latero-apical portions of each elytron, as well as by the shape of aedeagus with short and narrow median lobe and extremely long parameres. Distribution. The new species is known from several locations (Fig. 65) in the Emei Shan range (Fig. 66) in Sichuan, China. Bionomics. All specimens were taken by sifting forest floor litter at elevations from 1947 to 2342 m a.s.l. Etymology. The specific epithet is the Latin adjective minor (smaller, inferior). It refers to the small size of the species.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEvolution and Paleontology StudiesTravaux en français237 207