Notice bibliographique
Résumé
78. Western Water Shrew Sorex navigator French: Musaraigne de Washington / German: Westliche Wasserspitzmaus / Spanish: Musgano occidental Taxonomy. Neosorex navigator Baird, 1858, “ Fort Vancouver, W. T. [= Washington Territory],” Washington, USA. Sorex navigator is in the S. palustris group and subgenus Ofisorex; it is sister to S. bendiru. It was previously included in S. palustris, although genetic and morphometric studies have justified its distinct status. There is apparent hybridization between it and S. palustris where their distributions meet in Alberta and British Columbia. Distribu- tional limits between the two species are uncertain, and additional studies are needed. Distributional limits between S. palustris and S. navigator are still very uncertain, and because of this, much of the ecological data cannot be reliably attributed to one species. Thus, all ecological data for S. albibarbis, S. navigator, and S. palustris are presented under S. palustris here. Two subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. S.n.navigatorBaird,1858—NorthAmericanCordilleraandWesternCoastalRegionsinSAlaska,WCanada,andWUSA;specificdistributionuncertain. S. n. brooksi R. M. Anderson, 1934 — Vancouver I (SW Canada). Descriptive notes. Head—body 56-85 mm, tail 62-79 mm, hindfoot 17-20-5 mm; weight 6-5-21-5 g. The Western Water Shrew is a large semi-aquatic shrew, very similar to the American Water Shrew (S. palustris), although it is smaller in size on average and has a longertail. Pelage is highly variable; dorsum is generally blackish brown and occasionally flecked with white, giving it grizzled appearance. Venteris silvery white to buffy brown. Occasionally, there is a nearly all blackish form, with lighter throat and chest, although this is rare. Feet are large and broad, and hindfeet are partially webbed and have small white hairs protruding on their sides. Tail is long, somewhat laterally flattened, and bicolored, being dark blackish brown above and lighter below, with small tip of fur at end. Skull has relatively longer unicuspid toothrow, smaller first unicuspid, and longer rostrum compared with the American Water Shrew. Teeth are pigmented dark red. There are five unicuspids, third is smaller than fourth, and fifth is much smaller. Habitat. Around streams, ponds, lakes, swamps, marshes, and bogs. Western Water Shrews are most common around small, fast-moving streams surrounded by dense overhanging riparian vegetation and rocks. Although they are most commonly associated with water, individuals have been captured far from water sources, which probably represents dispersing individuals. Food and Feeding. Diets of Western Water Shrews are probably similar to those of the American Water Shrew. Breeding. Reproduction of the Western Water Shrew is probably similar to that of the American Water Shrew. Activity patterns. Western Water Shrews are semi-aquatic, with activity patterns probably similar to those of the American Water Shrew. Movements, Home range and Social organization. The Western Water Shrew is probably similar to the American Water Shrew. Status and Conservation. Not assessed on The IUCN Red List. The Western Water Shrew is common and widespread, butit is threatened by localized habitat destruction and water pollution. Bibliography. Beneski & Stinson (1987), Brown (1967), Catania (2006), Conaway (1952), Conaway & Pfitzer (1952), Cook et al. (1997), Craig et al. (2001), Gusztak & Campbell (2004), Himes & Kenagy (2010), Hope et al. (2014), Mycroft et al. (2011), Nagorsen et al. (2017), Sorenson (1962).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,144 | 0,072 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».