MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6894031920 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6772744

Lynx pardinus

2009· article· en· W6894031920 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHabitatNational parkMediterranean climateShrublandPredationCoatSubspecies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

24. Iberian Lynx Lynx pardinus French: Lynx ibérique / German: Pardelluchs / Spanish: Lince ibérico Other common names: Pardel Lynx, Spanish Lynx Taxonomy. Felis pardinus Temminck, 1827, Portugal. Formerly considered a subspecies of L. lynx, but a recent molecular phylogenetic assessment suggests specific status. Monotypic. Distribution. SW Spain and Portugal. Descriptive notes. Head-body 68.2-82 cm, tail 12:5-16 cm; weight 7-14 kg. About half the size of Eurasian Lynx, and are closer in size to the Bobcat and Canadian Lynx. Males are about 25% larger than females. A long-legged cat, with a short tail, short body, and relatively small head. Both sexes have a prominentfacial ruff and the ears are tipped with a long tuft of black hair. Easily recognizable as the most heavily spotted member of the genus. The basic coat color is bright yellowish red or tawny with dark spots and white underparts. The coat is sparse, short and coarse. Habitat. Generally, most abundant in areas of high habitat diversity, particularly in a mosaic of open forest mixed with extensive dense brush or shrub. In Donana National Park in south-west Spain, consistently prefer Mediterranean scrubland habitat over all other habitat types. They also use ash stands but avoid pine and eucalyptus plantations. Not unexpectedly, the two preferred habitats contained the highest densities of rabbits, the cat’s main prey. More than 90% of daytime rest sites are in thick heather scrub. The presence of permanent water sites and relatively low disturbance by humans are also important components of high quality habitat. Food and Feeding. Feed almost exclusively on European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus); unlike Eurasian Lynx, which is principally a predator of small ungulates. In Donana National Park, rabbits contribute 75 to 93% of the diet, but in other areas their diet includes a few other taxa. Fawns and juvenile Fallow Deer and Red Deer form a minor part of the diet in fall and winter, and a variety of small murid rodents, snakes, and lizards are also occasionally taken. Also prey on birds, principally ducks and geese, and red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). In Donana hunt mainly in the open pastures and scrub forest edge between the scrublands and marshes. Kill rabbits with a bite to the base of the skull. Deer are killed by suffocation, with one or more throat bites. Deer kills are dragged into dense cover where they provide food for a single Lynx for several days. Like many othercats, they attempt to conceal kills by raking leaves,soil, and other debris over what remains of the carcass. In captive feeding trials the maintenance diet for a male is estimated at 912 Kcal/day compared to 673 Kcal/day for a female. Feeding solely on rabbits could satisfy these energy requirements with 379 rabbits/year for males and 277 rabbits/year for a non-reproducing female. Activity patterns. Radio-telemetry studies show that are primarily nocturnal, but there is a good deal of individual and seasonal variation. Radio-telemetry studies in Donana found that in summer are primarily nocturnal and activity is high around sunrise and sunset. In winter, were commonly found moving around during the daytime. In general the activity patterns are closely synchronized with its major prey, the rabbit. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Travel extensively and probably visit most parts of their home range every few days. One adult male traveled an average of 9-3 km per day over four 24hour periods; the distances traveled varied from 5-9 km to 13-6 km per night. Males traveled an average of 8-7 km per day compared to 6-4 for females. Based on radio-tracking data, the average home range size of resident males was 10-3 km? and for resident females it was 8-7 km?. The social organization is similar to that of other felids. There is little range overlap for resident animals of the same sex, but male ranges overlap female ranges. Occupancy of ranges is indicated primarily by scent marking, principally with urine and feces. They leave their feces at non-random locations within their ranges, preferring to deposit their scats at intersections of trails and roads. Apart from females with young and mating pairs, are essentially solitary. Breeding. There are surprisingly few details available on the mating behavior. Mating is thought to begin in January and February, and following a 63-73 day gestation period, kittens are born in March or April. Litter size varies from 1-4, but the most common numberis two. Females with young kittens restrict their movements to a small area around the den site: one female used an area of only 1-7 km® until her kittens were two months old. Young remain in their natal ranges until they disperse at about 20 months of age. Status and Conservation. Possibly the most endangered of the world’s felids. Listed on CITES Appendix I and classified as Critically Endangered on the The IUCN Red Lust. Legally protected throughout its range. Between 1960 and 1978 the habitat shrank by some 80%. Agriculture programs and large scale conversion of native forest to pine and eucalyptus plantations in Spain and Portugal, coupled with myxomatosis epidemics among the rabbit population, reduced the population to an estimated 880-1050 animals in Spain, with perhaps another 50 in Portugal. Since then there has been a further reduction in population size and today an estimated 84-143 adults survive in two or three isolated pockets in south-western Spain. Its survival in Portugal is uncertain at present. There are only two known breeding populations in Spain: in the Coto Donana (24-33 adults) and Andujar-Cardena in the eastern Sierra Morena (60-110 adults). These populations are isolated from one another making them even more vulnerable. Estimates of density in Donana varies from 10-18/ 100 km *. The current population exists in small, isolated, and highly fragmented patches of habitat. Few die of natural causes, some 75% of mortality being due to human related activities, such as shooting, poisoning, or trapping. Many are killed while trying to cross roads. After several years of unsuccessful attempts, new efforts are being made to breed them in captivity for possible reintroduction to the wild. Bibliography. Aldama & Delibes (1991), Aldama et al. (1991), Aymerich (1982b, 1992), Beltran (1991), Beltran & Delibes (1993, 1994), Beltran, Aldama & Delibes (1992), Beltran, Rice & Honeycutt (1996), Beltran, San José et al. (1985), Delibes (1980), Delibes et al. (1975), Ferreras, Aldama et al. (1992), Ferreras, Beltran et al. (1997), Garcia-Perea et al. (1985), IUCN (2008), Moreno & Villafuerte (1995), Nowell & Jackson (1996), Palomares, Delibes et al. (2001), Palomares, Rodriguez et al. (1991), Rau et al. (1985), Robinson & Delibes (1988), Rodriguez & Delibes (1992), Rogers (1978), Serra & Sarmento (2006), Sunquist & Sunquist (2002), Vargas etal. (2005), Werdelin (1981, 1990), Zapata et al. (1997).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,066
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,221

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0660,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEvolution and Paleontology StudiesTravaux en français237 207