Notice bibliographique
Résumé
202. Pygmy Fruit-eating Bat Artibeus phaeotis French: Dermanure pygmée / German: Zwergfruchtvampir / Spanish: Artibeo pigmeo Taxonomy. Dermanura phaeotis G. S. Miller, 1902, “Chichen Itza [= Chichén-Itzd], Yucatan,” Mexico. Artibeus turpis from Tabasco (southern Mexico), described by RK. Andersen in 1906, 1s a junior synonym of A. p. phaeotis. Considered in the genus Dermanura by some authors but reassigned to Artibeus (subgenus Dermanura) after reinterpretation of molecular results. Some authors recognized A. ravus as a synonym of A. phaeotis, but according to molecular evidence, they are considered different species. Three subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. A.p.phaeotisG.S.Miller,1902—E&SEMexico(fromVeracruztoYucatanPeninsula),NGuatemala,Belize,Honduras,ENicaragua,ECostaRica,PanamaandWColombia. A.p.nanusK.Andersen,1906—W&SWMexico(fromSinaloatoOaxaca). A. p. palatinus W. B. Davis, 1970 — S Mexico (SW Chiapas), S Guatemala, W El Salvador, W Nicaragua, and W Costa Rica. Records from W Ecuador and N Peru are unverified; they could represent the Little Fruit-eating Bat (A. ravus), which was thought to be part of this taxon. Those from Venezuela, N Brazil, and Guyana probably represent misidentifications. Descriptive notes. Head—body 51-60 mm (tailless), ear 14-18 mm, hindfoot 8-12 mm, forearm 35-2-41-8 mm; weight 8-15-6 g. Skull of the Pygmy Fruit-eating Batis small, with short and broad rostrum, and is characterized by high cranial dome. Dorsal fur is light pale brown or grayish, short (4-6 mm), faintly tricolored, and soft; it extends to base of forearm. Light brown ocular ring is present, with two well-marked white facial stripes. Ventralfur is slightly paler than dorsum. Noseleaf is thick and pointed compared with other species of Stenodermatinae. Ears are rounded, moderated in size, and brown and usually have conspicuous whitish or pale yellow tips. Tragus is pointed, with many lobes of different sizes on the outside, giving a serrated appearance. Fur covers more than one-half of each forearm. Wing membranes are black, except for second interdigital membrane that lacks pigmentation. Tail membrane is pale, moderated in size (9-11 mm), U-shaped, and almost completely naked. Dental formulais12/2,C1/1,P 2/2, M 2/2 (x2) = 28. Upper and lower molars are relatively small compared with other species of similarly sized Artibeus. Habitat. Seemingly associated with tropical deciduous forest, tropical rainforest, tropical dry forests, shrublands, and second growth forests and plantations (banana). The Pygmy Fruit-eating Bat might occur in dryareas (e.g. Yucatan Peninsula), using tropical forest islands or “petenes” of coastal wetlands. Food and Feeding. The Pygmy Fruit-eating Bat is mainly frugivorous and occasionally eats insects and pollen. In dry forests of Costa Rica, eleven plants species are used for food and ten plant genera in Panama, including Ficus spp. (Moraceae), Cecropia spp. (Urticaceae), and Spondias spp. (Anacardiaceae). Breeding. Breeding pattern of the PygmyFruit-eating Bat has been characterized as bimodal polyestry. In Costa Rica, there is information of births at the end of dry seasons (April) and middle of rainy seasons (August-September). Females have one young per pregnancy. In the Yucatan Peninsula, breeding season occurs in rainy season. Activity patterns. The Pygmy Fruit-eating Bat is nocturnal. It uses caves or tents made from leaves of bananas, Heliconia (Heliconiaceae), Philodendron (Araceae), and palms. Long leaves are chewed along edge of midrib to form an “upturned boat” shape; fanshaped leaves are cut in a polygonal shape around their bases. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Pygmy Fruit-eating Bats roost alone or in small groups. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List (as Dermanura phaeotis). Bibliography. Andersen (1906b), Davis (1970a), LaVal & Rodriguez-Herrera (2002), Le6én & Montiel (2006), Miller et al. (2015c), Reid (2009), Rodriguez-Herrera et al. (2007), Timm (1985, 1987).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».