MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6894052735 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319516

Lasioglossum Curtis 1833

2023· article· en· W6894052735 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaKey (lock)AppendageOblique caseDorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Key to Nearctic Lasioglossum groups with enlarged tegula 1. Head and mesosoma black to brown ................................................................................................ 2 – Head and mesosoma metallic golden, green, or blue ....................................................................... 3 2. Mesepisternum rugose .............................................. L. (Hemihalictus) kincaidii (Cockerell, 1898) – Mesepisternum imbricate ..................................... L. (Hemihalictus) glabriventre (Crawford, 1907) 3. Metasoma with no appressed tomentum in either sex (but with abundant simple setae); S2–S4 with long (2–4 OD), dense, scopa-like pubescence in males ..................................................................... ............................. L. (Dialictus) knereri Gibbs, 2010 (atypical forms only known from California) – Metasoma with some appressed tomentum at least on T2–T3 basolateral areas in females; S2–S4 with shorter (1–2 OD) and sparser pubescence in males, not scopa-like ......................................... 4 4. T1 with lateral tomentum (except in some males); clypeus projecting more than 50% below suborbital tangent; propodeum oblique carina absent in both sexes ................................................................... .......................................................................................... L. (Dialictus) perdifficile species complex – T1 without lateral tomentum in either sex; clypeus projecting about 50% below suborbital tangent; propodeum oblique carina present in females (but may be fine and difficult to distinguish from background surface sculpture) ........................................ L. (Dialictus) gemmatum species complex Key to females 1. Mesoscutum with appressed, fine, stubble-like setae less than 0.25 OD long, appearing shaved, and erect plumose setae about 1 OD long or less, these setae very sparse (each seta separated by about its length from the one nearest it, with some gaps about a seta’s length wide visible in lateral view) (Fig. 78A–B); mesoscutum golden-green to coppery, contrasting with blue to blue-green propodeum; size very small (ITS 0.67–0.77 mm); metasoma black .................................................................... 2 – Mesoscutum with appressed, fine setae 0.25–0.5 OD long and erect plumose setae about 1 OD long, these setae dense (each seta within its length from the one nearest it, with no gaps wider than half a seta’s length visible in lateral view) (Fig. 78C–D); mesoscutum usually concolourous with propodeum; size larger (ITS normally> 0.77 mm, except in L. gloriosum sp. nov., L. indagator sp. nov., and L. rufodeludens sp. nov., in which the metasoma is red-orange) ................................. 3 2. Tegula sparsely punctate (IS = 1–4 PD) at least laterally, not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view, with inner posterior margin straight, coming to a blunt angle posteriorly (Fig. 79A); apical rims of T1–T3 minutely punctate (Fig. 80A) (deserts of southern United States and northern Mexico) .................................................................................................... L. perparvum (Ellis, 1914) – Tegula densely punctate (IS <1 PD), exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view by almost 1 OD, with inner posterior margin concave and a rounded projection reaching axilla posteriorly (Fig. 79B); apical rims of T1–T3 impunctate (Fig. 80B) (Neotropical Mexico, rarely occurring north to United States border) ................................................................................ L. magnitegula sp. nov. 3. Tegula impunctate except on extreme anterior margin (Fig. 81A) ................................................... 4 – Tegula with at least a few distinct punctures medially, usually many (Fig. 81B–C) ........................ 7 4. Tegula dark brown; mesoscutum coarsely punctate (punctation similar to mesepisternum) ............. ......................................................................................................................... L. profundum sp. nov. – Tegula yellow-orange; mesoscutum more finely punctate (punctures smaller than those of mesepisternum) ................................................................................................................................. 5 5. Mesoscutum and mesepisternum completely dull, tessellate to imbricate; metasoma entirely redorange (eastern Texas, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas) ................................ L. rufodeludens sp. nov. – Mesoscutum lateral and posterior margins and/ or mesepisternum shiny with at most weak microsculpture (rarely both dull); at least basal half of discs of metasomal terga reddish brown to black (apical areas may be red-orange or black) .............................................................................. 6 6. Postgena smooth and shiny (as in Fig. 82A) (Chihuahuan and Sonoran Deserts) ............................. ............................................................................................................................. L. deludens sp. nov. – Postgena dull, lineolate (as in Fig. 82B) (Florida Keys and Bahamas) .............................................. ................................................................................................. L. surianae (Mitchell, 1960) [in part] 7. Mesoscutum, preëpisternum, mesepisternum, and hypoepimeron margins fringed with appressed tomentum (Fig. 83A); metepisternum covered in dense tomentum obscuring the surface; metanotum median third covered in dense pubescence obscuring the surface (Fig. 83A); tegula and metasoma bright red-orange .............................................................................................................................. 8 – Mesoscutum and pleura without appressed tomentum (except sometimes mesoscutum anterolateral margins or metepisternum with sparse tomentum not obscuring the surface) (Fig. 83B); metanotum with dense pubescence limited to anterior margin (Fig. 83B); tegula and metasoma usually black to brown (if red-orange, then lacking the other characters) .................................................................. 9 8. Mesepisternum with most punctures separated by half a puncture diameter or less (IS <0.5 PD) (Fig. 84A); tegula outer margin densely punctate (IS ≤ 1 PD) (Nevada, Utah, and northern New Mexico) ............................................................................................................. L. gloriosum sp. nov. – Mesepisternum with most punctures separated by up to one puncture diameter or slightly more (IS ≤1 PD) (Fig. 84B); tegula outer margin sparsely punctate (IS = 1–3 PD) (southern Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas) ............................................................................................ L. indagator sp. nov. 9. T2–T3 usually each slightly convex with apical rim distinctly downcurved in lateral view (Fig. 85A); T3 usually with dense and complete subapical band of tomentum (Fig. 86A); disc of T2 with deep and dense punctures (IS ≤ 1 PD) reaching premarginal line and contrasting with largely impunctate apical rim (Fig. 86A) (Colorado to Veracruz) .......................................... L. coactus (Cresson, 1872) – T2–T3 each flat in lateral view and apical rim continuous with contour of disc (Fig. 85B); T3 without subapical band of tomentum or this band sparse and broadly interrupted medially (except in L. stictaspis and L. tegulariforme, in which the disc of T2 has finer and sparser punctures (IS = 1–3 PD) either becoming inconspicuous near premarginal line or extending onto apical rim) (Fig. 86B) ............ 10 10. Tegula relatively large (maximum length more than half ITS and reaching or exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), densely punctate throughout (IS <1 PD), and usually with inner posterior margin deeply concave, forming a broadly rounded posterior projection about the size of 0.5–1 lateral OD (Fig. 87A) (United States west of ~99° and Mexico) ......................................11 – Tegula relatively small (maximum length about half ITS or less and at most reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), more sparsely punctate medially (IS ≥ 1 PD), and with inner posterior margin straight or weakly concave, forming a sharp posterior angle or point smaller than 0.5 lateral OD (Fig. 87B) (if tegula larger or more densely punctate, then occurring in United States east of ~99°) .................................................................................................................................... 17 11. Metapostnotum smooth with fine, subparallel rugae and completely dull due to fine reticulate microsculpture (Fig. 88A) .............................................................................................................. 12 – Metapostnotum roughened with strong, usually anastomosing rugae (except usually subparallel in L. gaudiale) and shiny basally between rugae due to weak microsculpture (Fig. 88B) ................. 13 12. Face slightly longer on average (length/width ratio 0.8–0.85) (Fig. 89A); mesepisternum densely punctate (IS <1 PD) and usually shiny; mesoscutum uniformly dull due to strong tessellate microsculpture; in Nearctic region, T1–T2 apical rims distinctly punctate with no change in sculpture across premarginal line (impunctate in Neotropics) ................. L. pseudotegulare (Cockerell, 1896) – Face slightly shorter on average (length/width ratio 0.77–0.84) (Fig. 89B); mesepisternum usually dull or more sparsely punctate (with some IS ≥1 PD) and/or mesoscutum shiny at least on lateral and posterior margins; T1–T2 apical rims impunctate or punctures much sparser and finer than on discs ........................................................................................ L. stictaspis species complex [in part] 13. T1 disc with impunctate median line 1 OD wide or slightly le

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,147

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0440,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207