MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6894064717 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6818819

Glaucomys sabrinus

2016· article· en· W6894064717 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSquirrel monkeyGround squirrelSubspeciesSciurusDorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

111. Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus French: Grand Polatouche / German: Nordliches Gleithornchen / Spanish: Ardilla voladora septentrional Other common names: Carolina Flying Squirrel; Alaska Coast Flying Squirrel (zaphaeus), Atnarko Flying Squirrel (reductus), Bachman Flying Squirrel (oregonensis), Bangs Flying Squirrel (bangsi), Broad-footed Flying Squirrel (/atipes), California Coast Flying Squirrel (stephens), Cascade Flying Squirrel (fuliginosus), Hudson Bay Flying Squirrel (sabrinus), Klamath Flying Squirrel (klamathensis), Labrador Flying Squirrel (makkovikensis), Mearns's Flying Squirrel (macrotis), Okanagan Flying Squirrel (columbiensis), Richardson Flying Squirrel (alpinus), San Bernardino Flying Squirrel (californicus), Sierra Flying Squirrel (lascivus), Yellow-bellied Flying Squirrel (flaviventris), Yukon Flying Squirrel (yukonensis) Taxonomy. Sciurus sabrinus Shaw, 1801, no type locality given. Restricted by A. H. Howell in 1918 to the mouth of the Severn River, Ontario, Canada. Twenty-five subspecies are recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. G.s.sabrinusShaw,1801—EQuebecandWLabradortoNOntariototheNWportionoftheNorthwestTerritories(Canada)toNMinnesotatoNWWisconsin(USA)andSOntarioandSQuebec(Canada). G.s.alpinusRichardson,1828—N&EBritishColumbia,extendingslightlyovertheNborderintotheYukonandovertheEborderintoSWAlberta(Canada). G.s.bangsiRhoads,1897—CIdaho,EOregon,SWMontana,SouthDakota,andWyo-mingMts(USA). G.s.californicusRhoads,1897—SanBernardinoandSanJacintoMtsinSWCalifornia(USA). G.s.canescensA.H.Howell,1915—NENorthDakota,extendingintoMinnesota(USA)andManitoba(Canada). G.s.coloratusHandley,1953—theborderareaofNorthCarolinaandTennessee(USA). G.s.columbiensisA.H.Howell,1915—S&CBritishColumbia(Canada)andNWash-ington(USA). G.s.flaviventrisA.H.Howell,1915—NCalifornia(USA)fromtheTrinityMtsinSiski-youandTrinitycountiesEtotheWarnerMtsinModocCounty. G.s.fuliginosusRhoads,1897—theCascadeRange,fromSBritishColumbia(Canada)throughWashingtonandOregontotheSiskiyouMts,California(USA). G.s.fuscusMiller,1936—E&CWestVirginia(USA). G.s.goodwiniR.M.Anderson,1943—theQuebecPeninsulatoNNewBrunswick(Canada). G.s.gouldiR.M.Anderson,1943—PrinceEdwardIandNovaScotia(Canada). G.s.griseifronsA.H.Howell,1934—LakeBay,onPrinceofWalesI,Alaska(USA). G.s.klamathensisMerriam,1897—COregon,EoftheCascadeRange(USA). G.s.lascivusBangs,1899—SierraNevadaRangeandNtoEShastaCounty,California(USA). G.s.latipesA.H.Howell,1915—SEBritishColumbiaandAlberta(Canada),andhigh-erMtsofNIdahoandNWMontana,andWashington(USA). G.s.lucifugusHall,1934—Utah(USA). G.s.macrotisMearns,1898—SOntariotoNewBrunswick(Canada)toMaine,StoNPennsylvania,andWtoNMichigan,NEWisconsintoElkRiver,Minnesota(USA). G.s.makkovikensisSornborger,1900—NENewfoundlandandLabradorandadjacentQuebec(Canada). G.s.murinauralisMusser,1961—MtsofSWUtah(USA). G.s.oregonensisBachman,1839—coastalregionsofSBritishColumbia(Canada),WashingtonandOregon(USA). G.s.reductusCowan,1937—mid-coastalareaofBritishColumbia,neartheKoeyeRiver,andinlandtowardWisteriaandChezacut,theChilotanPlateau(Canada). G.s.stephensiMerriam,1900—NWcoastalCalifornia(USA). G.s.yukonensisOsgood,1900—S&CYukon(Canada),andS&CAlaska(USA). G. s. zaphaeus Osgood, 1905 — coastal region of SE Alaska (USA) and N British Columbia (Canada). Descriptive notes. Head—body 115-190 mm, tail 122-160 mm; weight 110-185 g. Nominate sabrinus is vinaceous cinnamon on upper parts; sides of head are smoke gray; eye ring and dorsal surface oftail are fuscous; ventral surface oftail is shaded with brown; and underparts are soiled white, washed with pale yellowish and drab shaded. Subspecies alpinus is grayer and less vinaceous above; tail is darker, wood-brown mixed with fuscous on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Subspecies bangs: has more drab upper parts, grayerfeet, and pinkish cinnamon underparts. Subspecies californicus is paler and grayer than lascivus and has grayish wash on front offace, upper parts are light drab to yellowish wood-brown, and underparts are soiled buffy white-washed. Subspecies canescens is palest of subspecies; it resembles subspecies macrotis but has grayer head; upper parts and feet are pale; and underparts are whiter than on sabrinus. Subspecies coloratus has dorsum between cinnamon-brown and mikado brown; underparts are pale yellow-orange to ocherous buff; underside oftail is suffused with orange, with tail sooty along edges of distal one-half and at tip; and sides of face are gray washed with buff. Upper parts of columbiensis are vinaceous cinnamon to vinaceous fawn;it is paler above and below than oregonensis. Subspecies flaviventris is smaller than klamathensis, with more yellow on feet and underparts, which are white-washed with pale greenish yellow merging into woodbrown along sides. Subspecies fuliginosus resembles columbiensis but is browner above, darker below, and less brown on tail; it is also less rufous than oregonensis. Subspecies JSuscus is smaller and darker, with clear gray cheeks. Subspecies goodwini has a sayal brown to hazel back; underparts are light pinkish cinnamon, and feet are dark fuscous; and itis grayer on face and cheeks than gould:, with darker and duller winter coat and paler than makkovikensis. Tail of goodwiniis smoke gray and slightly darker brown toward tip, with underside oftail smoke gray to dull cinnamon-buff. Dorsum of gould: is buffy brown to dull orange-cinnamon; underparts are white, with hairs slightly buffy at tips; dorsal surface of tail is dull cinnamon, and ventralside is pinkish buff; feet are pale fuscous; and coat is brighter andtail is paler (above and below) than on macrotis and goodwini. Subspecies griseifrons is similar to zaphaeus, but upper parts of griseifrons are slightly darker, including tail, hindfeet, and gliding membrane; underparts are more whitish and less bufty; and sides of head and neck are more extensively grayish. Subspecies klamathensis resembles Juliginosus but is grayer on upper parts. Subspecies lascivus is similar to flaviventris but smaller and without yellow suffusion on underparts, which are instead grayish white with faint wash of light pink-cinnamon. Subspecies latipes is relatively large; it is similar to Suliginosus, although latipes is darker and grayer, and upper parts are drab, mixed with brown. Subspecies lucifugus is most similar to bangs, but lucifugus is paler, with less red and grayer, especially on face; feet are drabber; and underparts are whitish, lacking pinkish cinnamon tone. Subspecies macrotis tends to be on the smaller side; ears are slightly longer than typical; upper parts and hindfeet are pale cinnamon; and underparts are white with irregular washes of light pinkish cinnamon. Subspecies makkovikensisis slightly larger than typical; it has darker upper parts and feet and darker face and tail. Subspecies murinauralis resembles lucifugus but has upper parts that are more yellowish orange; head, face, and hindfeet of murinauralis are grayer; dorsal surface oftail is uniformly gray, without rufous tone, and darker on apical one-third oftail. Subspecies oregonensis is redder than zaphaeus, with upper parts dark reddish brown and underparts cinnamon or buff. Subspecies reductus is paler, less red on dorsal surface, and whiter on ventral surface; it has clear gray cheeks. Subspecies stephensi has reddish upper parts that are intermediate between lascivus and oregonensis, more precisely, upper parts are wood-brown, and underparts are whitish, with irregular washes oflight pinkish cinnamon. Subspecies yukonensis is larger than nominate sabrinus, with longertail and broader hindfoot; upper parts are cinnamon, pinkish to vinaceous. Subspecies zaphaeus resembles alpinus but has browner upper parts and darker underparts; eye ring is blackish. Chromosomal complement is 2n = 48 and FN = 74. Karyotype consists of 14 pairs of biarmed autosomes and nine pairs of acrocentric autosomes. Sex chromosomes consist of medium submetacentric X-chromosome and small submetacentric Y-chromosome. Individual chromosome length differs from that of the Southern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys volans). Habitat. Variety of forest types but most often boreal conifer forests or mixed stands, with significant conifer component. Although previously considered a specialist of primary forests, there is increasing evidence that the Northern Flying Squirrelis a habitat generalist. In the Appalachian Mountains (from New York to north-western Georgia, USA), it is often associated with spruce (Picea), fir (Abies), and hemlock (Tsuga), all Pinaceae; it also occurs in mature deciduousforests of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis, Betulaceae), sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Sapindaceae), beech (Fagus), and oak (Quercus), both Fagaceae. Food and Feeding. Although the Northern Flying Squirrel eats seeds and nuts of conifers and hardwoods,it is considered less granivorous than the Southern Flying Squirrel and may be an obligate mycophagist in many parts ofits distribution, often consuming large quantities of hypogeous fungi at certain times ofthe year. It may serve a keystone role by dispersing fungal spores and inoculating tree roots. The Northern Flying Squirrel also eats tree buds, catkins, staminate cones, tree sap, wild fruits, and animal material (e.g. songbirds, bird eggs, and insects). Breeding. Gestation of the Northern Flying Squirrel lasts 37-42 days; litters are 1-6 young but usually 2-4 young. Although three litters per year have been reported,it is unlikely that the same female produces more than one litter annually. Young are 5-6 g at birth. Activity patterns. The Northern Flying Squirrel is generally nocturnal, but it is also active either shortly before or after dawn and immediately after sunset. It is active throughout winter and often nests with conspecifics to conserve energy; it does not appear to have the same physiological adaptations for dealing with extreme c

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesTravaux en français237 207