Bassettia flavipes Nicholls & Melika & Digweed & Stone 2022, comb. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bassettia flavipes (Gillette, 1889), comb. nov., asexual generation Figs 82–93 Synonyms: Neuroterus flavipes Gillette 1889: 281. Male, female and gall. Description reprinted by Gillette (1890: 21). Beutenmüller (1910: 136) suggested that this species should probably be placed in Callirhytis or Andricus rather than Neuroterus. Kinsey (1923: 136) agreed, and left this species unplaced in his revision of Neuroterus. Callirhytis flavipes (Gillette): combination by Weld (1926: 91). Melika & Abrahamson (2002: 168) considered this species should belong to Andricus, however, this transfer was made only informally, without following the ICZN requirements. Material examined: Fifteen females “ Canada, Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, leg. S. Digweed, 27/04/2007, Q. macrocarpa ”. Diagnosis. This species possesses the diagnostic characters of Bassettia Ashmead, 1887: absence of a malar sulcus; the transversely rugose mesoscutum, dorsoventrally compressed mesosoma not arched in lateral view like in most Cynipini; subparallel lateral propodeal carinae; and a ring of dense white setae basally on 2nd metasomal tergum (Melika & Abrahamson 2007; Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010). Bassettia flavipes also forms inconspicuous twig galls in the asexual generation and integral leaf galls in the sexual generation, as in other Bassettia species (Melika & Abrahamson 2007; Medianero & Nieves-Aldrey 2010). Bassettia flavipes most closely resembles B. tenuana Weld, 1921. In B. flavipes the body is dark brown, the eye 2.0× as high as the length of the malar space, the notaulus incomplete, traceable at most along half the length of the mesoscutum, the forewing veins are light to transparent, the central propodeal area with numerous irregular short rugae, the metasoma as long as head+mesosoma and nearly as long as high in lateral view, 2nd metasomal tergum extending to 1/3 of metasoma length in dorsal view. In B. tenuana the body is black, the eye equal in height to the length of malar space, the notaulus complete, the forewing veins dark brown, the central propodeal area reticulate, the metasoma longer than head+mesosoma and distinctly longer than high in lateral view, 2nd metasomal tergum extending to 2/3 of metasoma length in dorsal view. Bassettia flavipes is also similar to B. gemmae Ashmead, 1896; both species have been recorded from Q. alba (Weld 1926). In B. flavipes the head and body dark brown, the mesoscutum uniformly alutaceous, the prominent part of the ventral spine of hypopygium more than 2.0× as long as broad in ventral view. In B. gemmae the head and body black, the mesoscutum transversely dull rugose, the prominent part of the ventral spine of hypopygium over 4.0× as long as broad in ventral view. In addition, the length-to-width ratio of the radial cell of B. gemmae is greater than that of B. flavipes. It must be also mentioned that the asexual and sexual females within Bassettia are very similar and only a few characters differentiate them. Description. Asexual female (Figs 82–92) Head, mesosoma, metasoma black; mouthparts, lower genal and clypeal margins, antennae, tegulae, coxal tips, bases and tips of femora and tibiae, tarsi apices, and ventral spine of hypopygium, all dark to light brown. Wing venation pale yellow or colourless. Head alutaceous without setae; rounded, 1.3× as broad as high and as broad as mesosoma in frontal view, 2.2× as broad as long in dorsal view. Gena alutaceous, broadened behind eye in frontal view, as broad as transverse diameter of eye in lateral view. Malar space alutaceous, with very delicate, indistinct striae radiating from clypeus and reaching eye, eye 2.0× as high as height of malar space. Eyes slightly converging ventrally. POL 1.9× as long as OOL; OOL 2.0× as long as diameter of lateral ocellus and as long as LOL; lateral ocelli rounded, median ocellus ovate. Transfacial distance 1.3× as long as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus 2.0× as long as distance between them, distance between torulus and eye as great as diameter of torulus. Antennal toruli level with the lower half of eye. Lower face alutaceous, with sparse short white setae, as high as frons, with short delicate striae radiating from clypeus and reaching eye, striae only alongside median part of lower face; sculpture of lower face rougher than frons; median area alutaceous, not elevated; lower face with two impressed smooth glabrous sulci starting from lateral edges of clypeus and extending to 1/3 of lower face height. Clypeus rectangular, 1.6× as high as broad, uniformly alutaceous, ventrally rounded, emarginate, without median incision, reaches beyond ventral edge of lower face; anterior tentorial pit small, rounded, inconspicuous; smooth, glabrous epistomal sulcus and smooth, glabrous clypeo-pleurostomal line distinct, strongly impressed. Frons and interocellar area uniformly alutaceous, without setae. Vertex, occiput, postocciput, postgena uniformly alutaceous, without parallel striae, with white setae; posterior tentorial pit large, ovate, area below impressed; occipital foramen slightly higher than height of postgenal bridge; hypostomal carina emarginate, continuing into united postgenal sulci which diverge toward occipital foramen, postgenal bridge anteriorly broader than high. Antenna longer than head+ mesosoma; with 12 flagellomeres (suture between F12 and F11 indistinct), scape and pedicel 2.0× as broad as F1, scape and pedicel shorter than F1, F1 1.4× as long as pedicel and 1.4× as long as F2, F2 longer than F3, F3=F4, F5=F6 and shorter than previous one, F7 to F11 nearly equal in length, F11 longer than F10; placodeal sensilla on F3–F12. Mesosoma slightly longer than high. Pronotum alutaceous, with white setae along margin, laterally broader than width of mesopleuron, anterolateral edge impressed, smooth, without sculpture. Propleuron alutaceous, with sparse setae. Mesoscutum uniformly alutaceous; slightly longer than broad (greatest width measured across mesoscutum level with base of tegulae). Notaulus incomplete, very weakly impressed, traceable at most to half the length of mesoscutum; anterior parallel line and median mesoscutal sulcus absent; parapsidal line in the form of a smooth stripe, extending slightly above tegula; circumscutellar carina broad, smooth along tegula. Mesoscutellum ovate, slightly longer than broad; posteriorly rounded and emarginate; uniformly rugoso-reticulate, overhanging metanotum. Mesoscutellum with narrow short transverse semilunar impression anteriorly, with smooth, glabrous bottom, with central broad triangular elevated area. Mesopleuron with delicate transverse striae starting posteroventrally and extending across mesopleuron and widening towards anterodorsal end, anteroventral quarter of mesopleuron smooth, shiny; speculum shiny, with very delicate, hardly traceable striae; mesopleural triangle rugose, with white setae; dorsal and lateral axillar areas alutaceous, without setae; subaxillular bar smooth, glabrous, at posterior end as high as height of metanotal trough; metapleural sulcus reaching mesopleuron at half its height, delimiting smooth, shiny triangular area along mesopleuron; upper part of mesopleural sulcus indistinct. Metascutellum rugose, as high as height of smooth, glabrous ventral impressed area; metanotal trough alutaceous, glabrous, without setae; propodeum uniformly alutaceous, lateral propodeal carinae strong, slightly bent outwards in posterior 1/3 of propodeum height, delimiting smooth, shiny central propodeal area with numerous irregular short rugae; lateral propodeal area smooth, shiny with dense white setae. Nucha very short, with a few logitudinal sulci laterally and dorsally. Tarsal claws simple, without basal lobe. Forewing longer than body, hyaline, with long dense cilia on margin, veins indistinct, pale, radial cell open, 4.2× as long as broad; R1 and Rs nearly reaching wing margin; areolet and Rs+M indistinct. Metasoma as long as head+mesosoma, nearly as long as high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum extending to 1/3 of metasoma length in dorsal view, with dense white setae anterolaterally; all terga smooth, glabrous, without micropunctures. Hypopygium without micropunctures, prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium 2.1× as long as broad in ventral view, with a few short setae ventrally. Body length 1.4–2.1 mm long (n = 15). Gall. Asexual galls (Fig. 93) are inconspicuous stem galls comprised of individual larval cells within corky bark on 2–3 year old twigs of Q. macrocarpa. Galls are not evident as swellings on twig surfaces. Galls are not induced on twigs of the previous year’s growth, nor are they present in smooth twigs. Biology. Asexual females of B. flavipes emerged in mid- to late April in Edmonton and oviposited into swelling buds, preferring those having the bud scales slightly open with green showing between them. Females actively palpated prospective buds, and briefly probed them by inserting their ovipositors between bud scales. Females then quickly plunged their ovipositors fully into the bud, oviposited for 10-20 seconds, retracted their ovipositors, and departed. Females mostly seemed to avoid buds into which they or other females had previously oviposited. Sexual generation galls are multilocular, fleshy swellings along the leaf midrib or major lateral veins (Fig. 94) and are visible starting in mid- to late May in Edmonton. Adults emerged starting in late June or early July, and males tended to begin emerging earlier than females. Each emerging adult appeared to cut its own exit hole from the gall. Adult females of the sexual generation of B. flavipes oviposited into twig bark. We did not assess whether unmated females oviposited or produced viable eggs. Sexual generation galls have been recorded from Q. macrocarpa and Q. alba (Burks 1979, Weld 1926), and the authors additionally observed them on Q. × bebbiana (Q. alba x Q. macrocarpa) and Q. × schuettei (Q. bicolor x Q. macrocarpa) at the Jardin Botaniqu
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».