Philonix fulvicollis Fitch 1859
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Philonix fulvicollis Fitch, 1859 (1858), sexual generation Figs 183–202, 204 Synonyms: Philonix fulvicollis Fitch (1859: 783), asexual females; Cynips (Teras) fulvicollis combination by Osten Sacken (1865: 379); Biorhiza fulvicollis combination by Ashmead (1885: 296); Biorrhiza fulvicollis combination and incorrect spelling by Dalla Torre (1893: 61); Philonyx fulvicollis combination and incorrect spelling by Smith (1910: 598); Cynips (Philonix) fulvicollis var. fulvicollis form fulvicollis combination by Kinsey (1930: 262); Cynips (Philonix) fulvicollis combination by Kinsey (1936: 207). Philonix nigricollis Fitch, 1859. Synonymized by Kinsey (1930: 262). Acraspis niger Gillette, 1889. Acraspis nigra corrected spelling by Dalla Torre (1893: 64); Philonix nigra combination by Beutenmueller (1909: 251); Philonyx nigra combination and incorrect spelling by Smith (1910: 598); Philonix niger correction by Felt (1918: 96). Synonymized by Kinsey (1930: 262). Acraspis gillettei Bassett, 1900. Acraspis gillettii incorrect spelling by Beutenmueller (1904: 25); Philonix gillettei combination by Felt (1906: 711); Philonyx gillettei combination and incorrect spelling by Smith (1910: 598). Synonymized by Beutenmueller (1909: 252). Kinsey (1930, 1936) described 6 additional species from the asexual generation and included them within his “ fulvicollis complex”: Cynips (Philonix) canadensis Kinsey, 1930 on Q. alba, Q. macrocarpa, Q. michauxii, and Q. muehlenbergii; Cynips (Philonix) major Kinsey, 1930 on Q. alba, Q. macrocarpa, Q. michauxii, and Q. muehlenbergii; Cynips (Philonix) rubricosa Kinsey, 1930 on Q. alba and Q. stellata, Cynips (Philonix) vorisi Kinsey, 1930 on Q. bicolor, Q. michauxii, and Q. macrocarpa; Cynips (Philonix) insulensis Kinsey, 1936 on Q. gambelii and Q. macrocarpa; and Cynips (Philonix) latigenae Kinsey, 1936 on Q. gambelii. Kinsey also included in this complex the taxa Philonix gigas Weld, 1922 on Q. lyrata and Philonix lanaeglobuli (Ashmead, 1887) on Q. michauxii, both known only from an asexual generation, plus Philonix pallipes (Bassett, 1900), known only from a sexual generation on Q. alba. Since then, Melika & Abrahamson (2002) synonymized Philonix pallipes to Acraspis gemula (Bassett, 1881). Weld (1951) and Burks (1979) treated Philonix insulensis (Kinsey), Philonix latigenae (Kinsey), Philonix gigas Weld, and Philonix lanaeglobuli (Ashmead) as distinct valid species, while the rest were treated as varieties of P. fulvicollis. We follow this treatment, thus Philonix fulvicollis var. canadensis (Kinsey), syn. nov., Philonix fulvicollis var. major (Kinsey), syn.nov., Philonix fulvicollis var. rubricosa (Kinsey), syn. nov. and Philonix fulvicollis var. vorisi (Kinsey), syn. nov. are all considered synonyms of P. fulvicollis. Material examined: One sexual female and one male labelled as “ CANADA: Alberta, Edmonton, 3761-20 Street, 53.47371°N, 113.37202°W, GPS ± 10m, reared 1.vi.2008 ex bud galls on Quercus macrocarpa, S. Digweed, det. Philonix fulvicollis Fitch, sexual generation female, S. Digweed 2008”. The female and male specimens have been deposited at the PHDNRL. Diagnosis. Sexual Philonix most closely resemble sexual Acraspis. In Acraspis the postgenal bridge shorter than the height of occipital foramen, the mesoscutum entirely smooth, notaulus incomplete, the mesoscutellum rounded, uniformly rugose; the metasoma only slightly longer than high. In Philonix the postgenal bridge as high as the occipital foramen, most of the mesoscutum smooth, except delicately alutaceous in the anterior part between notauli, notaulus complete, the mesoscutellum elongated with a smooth, glabrous surface in anterior half; the metasoma much higher in lateral view. Description. Sexual female (Figs 183–187, 192–196, 200–201). Body uniformly reddish brown, antenna slightly lighter, palpi yellow, legs uniformly yellow. Head alutaceous, with sparse white setae, denser on lower face, with distinct rows of setae along inner margin of eye; slightly broader than high and as broad as mesosoma in frontal view, 1.9× as broad as long in dorsal view. Gena alutaceous, not broadened behind eye in frontal view, 0.5× width of transverse diameter of eye in lateral view. Malar space alutaceous, with delicate striae radiating from clypeus and reaching eye margin; eye 3.8× as high as length of malar space. Inner margins of eyes parallel. POL 1.5× as long as OOL, OOL 1.9× as long as diameter of lateral ocellus and 1.7× as long as LOL, all ocelli ovate, of same size. Transfacial distance as long as height of eye; diameter of antennal torulus shorter than distance between them, distance between torulus and eye as long as diameter of torulus; lower face alutaceous, slightly elevated median area alutaceous. Clypeus rectangular, nearly 2.0× as broad as high, alutaceous, with a few long setae along ventral edge; ventrally rounded, slightly emarginate, without median incision; anterior tentorial pit rounded, distinct, epistomal sulcus distinct, clypeo-pleurostomal line well impressed. Frons and interocellar area uniformly alutaceous, without striae or setae. Vertex, occiput, postocciput and postgena alutaceous, with sparse white setae; posterior tentorial pit large, ovate, area below impressed; occipital foramen slightly higher than height of postgenal bridge; hypostomal carina emarginate, continuing into postgenal sulci which are not united and diverge toward occipital foramen, postgenal bridge anteriorly as broad as occipital foramen. Antenna longer than head+mesosoma, with 12 flagellomeres, scape only slightly longer than pedicel, pedicel slightly longer than broad, flagellomeres slightly broader towards apex; F1 2.0× as long as pedicel and 1.2× as long as F2; F2 slightly longer than F3; F3 slightly longer than F4, F5=F6, all subsequent flagellomeres equal in length; F12 slightly longer than F11; placodeal sensilla on F3–F12, absent on F1–F2. Mesosoma slightly longer than high. Pronotum smooth, glabrous, with sparse setae in dorsolateral part, with delicate short parallel striae along posterior edge; propleuron smooth, glabrous, with sparse white setae. Mesoscutum smooth, glabrous, delicately alutaceous at the anterior end between notauli, with a few white setae along notauli, slightly longer than broad (greatest width measured across mesoscutum level with base of tegulae). Notaulus complete, reaching pronotum, well impressed along entire length, with smooth bottom, posteriorly slightly converging; anterior parallel line inconspicuous, marked with slightly impressed narrow area, extending to 1/6 of mesoscutum length; median mesoscutal line absent; parapsidal line indistinct, circumscutellar carina narrow but distinct, reaching notaulus. Mesoscutellum quadrangular, longer than broad, with parallel sides, uniformly dull coriaceous, with strong irregular rugae along sides and posteriorly; posteriorly rounded, overhanging metanotum. Anterior part of mesoscutellum impressed, smooth, glabrous, in the form of a semilunar impression, with rugose triangular central area dividing anterior part into two halves. Mesopleuron smooth, glabrous, with a few white setae on the most posteroventral part; mesopleural triangle smooth, glabrous, with a few delicate longitudinally orientated striae and a few setae; dorsal and lateral axillar areas smooth, glabrous, with sparse setae; subaxillular bar smooth, glabrous, triangular, gradually higher toward posterior end, at posterior end as high as height of metanotal trough; metapleural sulcus distinct, reaching mesopleuron at half of its height. Metascutellum smooth, 0.5× as long as height of smooth, glabrous ventral impressed area; metanotal trough smooth, glabrous, without setae; central propodeal area lyre-shaped, smooth, glabrous, with a few short rugae, in posterior half the rugae continue onto nucha; lateral propodeal carinae distinct, complete, bent slightly outwards in posterior 1/3; lateral propodeal area smooth, glabrous, with sparse long white setae. Nucha with parallel longitudinal rugae dorsally and laterally. Tarsal claws simple, without basal lobe. dorsal view. Forewing longer than body, hyaline, with short cilia on margin, veins brown, radial cell open, 3.8x as long as broad; R1 and Rs nearly reaching wing margin; areolet triangular, closed and distinct. Rs+M narrow, indistinct, reaching basalis slightly below mid height. Metasoma as long as head+mesosoma, as long as high in lateral view; 2nd metasomal tergum extending to 1/3 length of metasoma in dorsal view, with a few setae laterally, without micropunctures; subsequent terga smooth, glabrous, without micropunctures. Hypopygium without micropunctures, prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium short, longer than broad in ventral view, with some long setae ventrally which extend far beyond apex of spine. Body length 1.9 mm (n = 1). Male (Figs 188–191, 197–199, 202). Similar to female but head, antenna, mesosoma, metasoma uniformly brown; mandibles light brown, mouthparts and legs uniformly yellow. Head transverse in frontal view; ocelli bigger than in female; malar space with striae, radiating from clypeus and reaching eye margin; ocelli elevated. Antenna as long as body, with 13 flagellomeres; scape+pedicel as long as F1, F1 slightly curved and broadened apically, longer than F2; F13 shorter than F12; placodeal sensilla on all flagellomeres. Metasoma shorter than mesosoma; 2nd metasomal tergum in the form of a narrow long petiole; metasomal tergum 3 longer than all subsequent terga together; all terga smooth, without micropunctures. Body length 1.8 mm (n = 1). Gall. The sexual generation galls (Fig. 204) occur s ingly in terminal buds of twigs of Q. macrocarpa. The gall is a relatively robust, seed-like, sub-ovoid cell approximately 2 mm long, dark brown when mature with longitudinal striations. Occupies the entire bud when mature, causing stunting or suppression of shoots and leaves produced from the bud. Biology. See Fitch (1859), Weld (192
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,060 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».