MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6894112631 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8290034

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) nanotegula Landaverde-González & Gardner & Moo-Valle & Quezada-Euán & Ayala & Husemann 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6894112631 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTaxonEtymologyDifferential diagnosisDifferential (mechanical device)Seta

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) nanotegula Landaverde-González & Husemann sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 907458CF-52CC-464C-A761-66B9373D5153 Figs 6H, 20–21, 25B, 26B, 27B, 34B Diagnosis Females of L. (D.) nanotegula sp. nov. can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of tegula small, ovoid (tegula width/ITS <0.20), and impunctate; frons punctures much finer and denser than those of lower paraocular area; head broader than long (length/width0.91–0.95); mesoscutum moderately sparsely punctate between parapsidal lines (i = 1–3 pd), becoming dense but not crowded laterad of parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd); metapostnotum shiny to weakly tessellate with strong coarse rugae reaching posterior margin; and T1–T3 apical impressed areas evenly covered with fine sparse punctures (i = 1–3 pd) with short simple setae arising from them (except absent on T1 medially). Males can be recognised by the same characters (however, the single male available for study is missing the metasoma, so metasomabased diagnostic characters are uncertain); in addition, males have the paraocular area and lower frons with dense appressed tomentum. Differential diagnosis Females of L. (D.) nanotegula sp. nov. are most similar to those of L. (D.) milpa sp. nov. and L. (D.) ameshoferi sp. nov. For comparison with Lasioglossum (D.) ameshoferi see above in L. (D.) ameshoferi differential diagnosis; however, the male of that species is unknown. For comparison with L. (D.) milpa see above in L. (D.) milpa differential diagnosis. Etymology The specific epithet ‘ nanotegula ’ is a combination of the Latin nouns ‘ nanus ’ (‘dwarf’) and ‘ tegula ’ (‘roof tile’, literally ‘covering instrument’, now applied to the sclerite covering the wing base). It refers to the small size of the tegula. Type material Holotype MEXICO – Yucatán • ♀; Mérida, 15 km S of University of Yucatán; [20.83° N, 89.62° W]; 7 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks leg.; ex Piscidia piscipula; SEMC SM0105925. Paratypes GUATEMALA – Huehuetenango • 1 ♀; Jacaltenango, San Andrés; 15.7167° N, 91.7455° W; elev. 1027 m; 28 Feb. 2010; Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.43341 • 1 ♀; La Democracia, Camojaíto; 15.616° N, 91.8727° W; elev. 940 m; 1 Mar. 2010; Daniel Sánchez leg.; ECOAB.43336 • 1 ♀; San Antonio Huista, Pinalito; 15.6653° N, 91.8618° W; elev. 963 m; 2 Mar. 2010; Jaime Florez leg.; ECOAB.43339. MEXICO – Chiapas • 1 ♀; Arriaga, Ej. Adolfo López Mateos; 16.3463° N, 93.9741° W; elev. 367.5 m; 17 Jul. 2009; Carlos Balboa, Miguel Guzmán and Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.53487 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 17 Nov. 2009; ECOAB.53350 • 1 ♀; Arriaga, Paraje, Poza Verde; 16.3428° N, 93.952° W; elev. 465.5 m; 14 Mar. 2009; Carlos Balboa, Miguel Guzmán and Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.53314 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 15 Jul. 2009; ECOAB.53483 • 2 ♀♀; La Trinitaria, Carretera 190; 16.0424° N, 92.0179° W; elev. 1041 m; 15 Feb. 2014; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.53398, ECOAB.53399 • 1 ♀; Mapastepec, El Unión Los Olivos; 15.3083° N, 92.4738° W; elev. 315 m; 1 Apr. 2005; M. Rincón, Ricardo Ayala Barajas, R. Vandame and Miguel Guzmán leg.; ECOAB.43760 • 1 ♀; Ocosingo, El Rosario; 16.8859° N, 92.2742° W; elev. 1118 m; 11 Feb. 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.43281 • 2 ♀♀; Ocosingo, Sibaca; 16.9447° N, 92.1839° W; elev. 1107 m; 12 Apr. 2010; Carlos Balboa leg.; ECOAB.43271, ECOAB.43331 • 1 ♀; San Juan Cancuc, Tzuluwitz; 16.894° N, 92.4019° W; elev. 1270 m; 6 Apr. 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.43325. – Quintana Roo • 1 ♀; 12 km NW of Reforma; [18.89° N, 88.65° W]; 14 Oct. 1986; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; SEMC SM0105924 (photographed) • 1 ♀; Tah Dziú; [20°10′06.9″ N, 88°55′36.2″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 237; ZMH 842031 • 2 ♀♀; Uxmal Ruins, 16 km SW of Muna; [20.36° N, 89.77° W]; 14 Feb. 1987; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC. Other material examined MEXICO – Jalisco • 1 ♀; Chamela; [19.5° N, 105.04° W]; 26 Sep. 1985; R.J. McGinley leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 30 Sep. 1985; USNM • 2 ♀♀; Guadalajara; [20.65° N, 103.35° W]; J.C. Crawford leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Mascota; [20.53° N, 104.79° W]; 17 Jul. 1989; R.J. McGinley leg.; USNM. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; Tah Dziú; 6 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 452b; ZMH 839503 • 1 ♀; Muna; [20°28′15.7″ N, 89°46′53.5″ W]; 22 Jul. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 570; ZMH 842054 • 1 ♀; Tixmehuac; [20°15′52.4″ N, 89°08′58.1″ W]; 15 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 410; ZMH 842034 • 1 ♀; Tixcuytun; [20°12′21.80″ N, 89°09′17.50″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 488b; ZMH 842036 • 1 ♂; Xaya, [20°16′51.70″ N, 89°11′28.70″ W], 5 Aug. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 621c; ZMH 839508 • 1 ♀; Tixcuytun; [20°12′21.80″ N, 89°09′17.50″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 493; ZMH 842037 • 1 ♀; Muna; [20°28′15.7″ N, 89°46′53.5″ W]; 22 Jul. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 569a; ZMH 842068 • 1 ♀; Yaxcopil; [20°4′4.10″ N, 88°54′23.80″ W]; 1 Aug. 2011; QuezadaEuán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 605b; ZMH 842069 • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; [20°05′02.5″ N, 89°09′39.3″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 92; ZMH 842066. Floral records FABACEAE Juss.: Piscidia L.: P. piscipula (L.) Sarg. • SOLANACEAE Adans.: Capsicum L.: C. chinense Jacq. DNA barcodes Seventeen sequences available (BOLD process IDs: LDSPS040-15 to LDSPS051-15, LDSPS096-15, LDSPS097-15, LDSPS100-15 to LDSPS102-15). These sequences are highly variable (maximum intraspecific p-distance 1.3%; minimum interspecific distance, to L. aureoviride sp. nov., 3.96%). The other sequences not from Yucatán are much less variable, with a clear barcode gap (maximum intraspecific p-distance 0.2%; minimum interspecific distance, to L. nanotegula sp. nov., 4.4%). This species is a member of the informal L. comulum species group and corresponds to mOTU 4 in Landaverde-González et al. (2017a). Description Female (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Length 4.45 mm; head length 1.21 mm; head width 1.33 mm; fore wing length 2.93 mm. Six female paratypes measured: length 4.25–4.46 mm; head length 1.15–1.21 mm; head width 1.21– 1.33 mm; fore wing length 2.91–2.94 mm. COLOUR. Head and mesosoma metallic blue-green to olive green; clypeus apical half black; supraclypeal area with golden reflection; scape and pedicel black, F1–F10 black, F8–F10 becoming brown ventrally; wing membrane subhyaline, subcosta dark brown, venation and pterostigma otherwise light brown; legs dark brown with distitarsi light brown; metasoma dark brown with rims of terga and sterna lighter reddish brown. PUBESCENCE. Dull white. Head and mesosoma with abundant long setae (1–2.5 OD); lower paraocular area and gena with sparse subappressed tomentum; propodeum with abundant plumose setae on lateral and posterior surfaces (2 OD); T1 with with dense complete setose fan; T2–T3 with small basolateral patches of appressed tomentum covering less than half length of segment laterally; disc of T4 with sparse appressed tomentum throughout; T1–T5 evenly covered with dense, short, simple setae, about half as long on T1–T2, becoming long and plumose laterally (1–2.5 OD); tibia and tarsal segments with plumose light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); supraclypeal area shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); paraocular area and antennocular area shiny and very densely punctate (i <0.5 pd); upper paraocular area and frons with fine crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); gena and postgena shiny; mesoscutum moderately sparsely punctate between parapsidal lines (i = 1–3 pd), becoming dense and crowded laterad of parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd); mesepisternum imbricate and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); metapostnotum shiny to weakly tessellate, with strong coarse rugae reaching posterior margin; propodeum with lateral surface and posterior surface weakly tessellate; T1– T3 minutely, sparsely punctate (i = 1–3 pd); T1 apical impressed area impunctate medially. STRUCTURE. Head wide (length/width ratio = 0.91–0.95; holotype = 0.91); eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.23–1.28; holotype = 1.23); clypeus ⁴/5 below suborbital tangent; antennal sockets close (IAD/AOD <0.52); frontal line ending> 2.5 OD below median ocellus; head broader than long (length/width 0.91–0.95); gena narrower than eye; inner metatibial spur with three teeth; tegula small, ovoid, not produced mesally (tegula width/ITS <0.215); scutellum length 0.28; metapostnotum length 0.22, metapostnotum elongate (MMR ratio = 1.27), posterior margin rounded onto posterior surface; propodeum with oblique carina straight and lateral carina not reaching margin of dorsal surface. Male MEASUREMENTS. Length 3.58 mm; head length 1.05 mm; head width 1.09 mm; fore wing length 2.57 mm. COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma metallic blue-green; scape and pedicel dark brown; F1–F10 dark brown dorsally, light brown ventrally; legs dark brown with tibial bases, apices, and tarsi light brown. PUBESCENCE. Dull white. Head and mesosoma with abundant plumose short setae (0.5–2 OD); paraocular area and lower frons with dense appressed tomentum; clypeus, supraclypeal area, and gena with sparse appressed tomentum; propodeum with abundant plumose setae on lateral and posterior surfaces (1–2 OD); S3–S5 pubescence short (1–2 OD), suberect, and weakly plumose, appearing simple at <40 × magnification; tibia and tarsal segments with plumose light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny and sparsely punctate (i = 1–3 pd); supraclypeal area shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); lower paraocular area and antennocular area shiny and densely punctate (i <1 pd); upper paraocular area and frons shiny with crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); ocellocular area shiny and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); gena and postgen

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,216
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,034

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207