MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6894113912 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7037024

Neocephalosphaera spinifera Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6894113912 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypePedicelSetaApex (geometry)Phallus (fungus)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Neocephalosphaera spinifera sp. nov. Figs 85–97, 131 Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂: COLOMBIA, Bolívar, SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Los Colorados, Alto El Mirador, 954’N / 7507’W, 400 m [eters], 06–21.xii.2001, E. Deulufuet “M2628 (1♂, IAvH) (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Right antenna and terminalia were placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along the specimen. Diagnosis. Fore and hind coxa whitish yellow, mid coxae brown; fore and hind trochanters whitish yellow, mid trochanter brown; femora dark yellow, fore and mid femora with proximal quarter whitish yellow, hind femur with proximal half whitish yellow. Surstyli subsymmetrical, setose, both surstyli downward directed, with tips sideward directed. Apex of phallic guide short, with apex thin and downward directed. Phallus bifid, with ejaculatory ducts long and thin, covered by a membrane with spines on apex and apical hook. Description. MALE. (holotype). Body length 5.3 mm. Head (Figs 85–86). Eyes contiguous for 24 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.5, 0.2. Frons gray pruinose. Postcranium brown, gray pruinose laterally and ventrally, yellow pruinose dorsally. Antenna (Fig. 87). with scape and pedicel dark yellow, pedicel with four setae dorsally and five short setae ventrally; postpedicel light yellow, with short acuminate apex. LPP/WPP = 3.4. Thorax (Figs 86, 88). Postpronotal lobe whitish yellow. Scutum and notopleuron brown, yellow pruinose. Scutellum whitish yellow, brown on anterior margin, light brown pruinose. Mesopleuron and mediotergite brown, gray pruinose. Wing (Fig. 89). Length 6 mm. LW/MWW = 3.1; LTC/LFC = 0.4. Membrane almost hyaline; third section costal shorter than the length of fourth; vein r-m located before the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm; vein M 2 long; dmm/M 2 = 2.2; section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m; vein dm-m slightly curved. Halter stem beige, base brown, knob beige with a brown spot dorsally. Legs (Fig. 85). Fore and hind coxae whitish yellow; mid coxa brown; fore and hind trochanters beige; mid trochanter brown; femora dark yellow; fore and mid femora with proximal quarter whitish yellow; hind femur with proximal half whitish yellow; femora with rows of ventral spines and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterodorsally; fore tibia whitish yellow; mid and hind tibiae light yellow; tarsomeres 1–2 dark yellow; 3–5 light brown; pulvilli whitish yellow. Abdomen (Figs 85–86, 90). Dark brown, tergite 1 light brown, without setae laterally, gray pruinose dorsally; tergites 2–3 brown on basal half and yellow on distal half; gray pruinose on distal margin; tergites 4–5 dark brown on basal half and lightly brown on distal half, gray pruinose on distal margin and laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 91. Syntergosternite 8 light brown, yellow pruinose, shorter than tergite 5, with membranous area large, dividing syntergosternite 8 and reaching epandrium (Figs 90, 92). Terminalia (Figs 91–97). Epandrium and surstyli yellow. Surstyli (Figs 92–95) subsymmetrical, shorter than the length of epandrium, setose, both surstyli downward directed, thickened at the base, thin apically, with tips sideward directed; right surstylus slightly shorter and thinner than left; both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the proximal third, downward directed when seen in lateral view (Figs 94–95). Apex of phallic guide short, with apex thin and downward directed (Fig. 96). Ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped, with one lateral margin rounded (Fig. 97). Phallus bifid, with ejaculatory ducts long and thin, apparently covered by a membrane with spines on apex and apical hook (Fig. 96). Female. Unknown. Geographical distribution. Colombia (Bolívar) (Fig. 131). Etymology. From the Latin spina = spine. Refers to the spines in the membrane that attach the ejaculatory ducts. Habitat. The specimens were collected with Malaise traps at ground level. The vegetation of collection site corresponds to areas of tropical dry forest in the Caribbean region. Taxonomic notes. Based on male specimen N. spinifera sp. nov. is similar in appearance to N. miriamae Rafael, 1992 [see figures 42.9, 42.22, 42.57, 42.58, presented by Rafael (1992) and figures 1.H, 2.K, 3.K, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009)], N. semispiralis Rafael & Rosa, 1991 [see figures 7–11 presented by Rafael & Rosa (1991) and figures 1.N, 3.Q, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009)], and N. sumapazensis sp. nov. (Figs 114–125). It differs from N. miriamae by having the scutellum whitish yellow, light brown pruinose (Figs 86, 88) (versus scutellum dark brown to black, gray pruinose in N. miriamae); vein r-m located before the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm (Fig. 89) [versus vein r-m located after the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm, figure 42.22, presented by Rafael (1992)]; section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m (Fig. 89) [versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 equal than vein dm-m, figure 42.22, presented by Rafael (1992)]; fore and hind coxae whitish yellow, mid coxa brown (versus all coxae black); both surstyli with tips outward directed (Fig. 93) [versus both surstyli with tips inward directed, figure 42.57, presented by Rafael (1992)]; right surstylus slightly shorter and thin (Fig. 93) [versus right surstylus slightly longer and thickened, figure 42.57, presented by Rafael (1992)]; both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the proximal third when seen in lateral view (Figs 94–95) [versus left surstylus with subapical sinus ventrally in the proximal third when seen in lateral view, figure 42.58, presented by Rafael (1992)]. It differs mainly from N. semispiralis in having the mid coxae brown (versus mid coxa black in N. semispiralis); mid trochanter brown (versus mid trochanter black); scutellum light brown pruinose (Figs 86, 88) (versus scutellum gray pruinose); both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the proximal third, when seen in lateral view (Figs 94–95) [versus both surstyli with two ventral lobes, when seen in lateral view, figures 9–10, presented by Rafael & Rosa (1991)]. It differs mainly from N. sumapazensis sp. nov. by having the postpronotal lobe whitish yellow (Figs 85, 88) [versus postpronotal lobe light brown in N. sumapazensis sp. nov. (Figs 114, 116)]; scutellum whitish yellow (Figs 86, 88) [versus scutellum dark yellow (Figs 115–116)]; section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m (Fig. 89) [versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 smaller than vein dm-m (Fig. 117)]; both surstyli with tips outward directed (Fig. 93) [versus both surstyli with tips downward directed (Fig. 121)]; both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the proximal third when seen in lateral view (Figs 94–95) [versus both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the middle third when seen in lateral view (Figs 122–123)]; ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped, with one lateral margin rounded and other margin acute (Fig. 97) [versus ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped, with two lateral margins acute (Fig. 125)].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,056

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→Travaux en français237 207→