St. Neots Priory Quarter and Priory Centre Heritage Desk Based Assessment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A number of resources were consulted in the production of this heritage statement, including: � Cambridgeshire Historic Environment Record (HER) (received 02/02/22); � The National Heritage List for England (NHLE); � Local, regional and national planning policies relating to the historic environment. This includes conservation area appraisals and management plans; � Available online cartographic sources; � Additional available online historic resources; � Huntingdonshire Archives Mott MacDonald have been commissioned by Huntingdonshire District Council to produce a historic environment desk-based assessment (DBA) for four proposed development areas within the St Neots Priory Quarter / Priory Centre area. Within proposed development area 1 a four-storey residential building with a plot size of 3,382 m2 is proposed, whereas within proposed development area 2 a three-storey building with a plot size of 2,076 m2 is proposed for both retail and residential use. Within proposed development area 3 a three-storey building with a plot size of 1,157m2is proposed for both office and community use, within area 5 a three-storey building with a plot size of 1,196m2 has been proposed for residential use. The proposed development areas are located within the town of St Neots to the east of the River Great Ouse, within the Ouse Valley and fall within the St. Neots conservation area. Two scheduled monuments and 126 listed buildings are within the 1km study area. There are no designated or non-designated heritage assets within the proposed development boundaries, however, it has been determined that the scheduled Priory likely extended further than it's scheduling suggests. This assessment has identified that there are known archaeological remains within the study area, indicating that there was activity within this landscape from the prehistoric period. Cartographic and aerial photographic evidence indicate that only proposed development area 1 has remained undeveloped. The potential for palaeoenvironmental evidence within the proposed development areas is considered to be medium. The potential for archaeological remains dating to the early medieval and medieval is considered to be high within all proposed development areas, with remains dating to the late post-medieval considered to be high within proposed development areas 1-3. The potential for early post-medieval remains is considered to be medium within all proposed development areas, with the potential for late-post medieval remains within proposed development area 5 also considered to be medium. The potential for Prehistoric, Roman and Modern remains within all proposed development areas is considered to be low.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».