Post-Excavation Assessment for an Archaeological Observation, Investigation & Recording - Northampton North West Relief Road Asset Diversion - Chapel Brampton
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The observation, investigation & recording monitored all intrusive works associated with the pipe connections and temporary compound construction, comprising topsoil stripping a 20m x 20m square in plan for the compound, and excavating 168m length, predominantly 8m wide (Figure 1), of topsoil and subsoil along the pipe route, to an average 0.40m in depth. All intrusive works were monitored by a suitably experienced archaeologist and the client provided the archaeologist with sufficient time to allow suitable investigation by hand. Archaeological deposits and features were recorded according to accepted professional standards. Sufficient data was recorded to allow for a full characterisation of contexts and their relationships to be made and allow for future studies to query and compare the dataset with confidence. Archaeological contexts were recorded and numbered individually on pro-forma context sheets with all relevant data such as drawings, photographic images, finds, environmental samples, height values and any other information cross-referenced. A further, more general record of the work comprising descriptions and discussions of the archaeology was maintained as appropriate. A complete digital photographic record of the work was kept. All images were taken using a camera with a suitable megapixel resolution. The photographic record is regarded as part of the site archive and digital files will be appropriately filed, saved, labelled and cross-referenced in relation to a site-specific photography register. The archive will be retained by Dalcour Maclaren or the Client until it can be deposited with the Northamptonshire Archaeological Resource Centre. The site archive will include all project records and cultural material produced by the archaeological mitigation and will be prepared and deposited in accordance with the standards as set out in the Northamptonshire Archaeological Resource Centre Archaeological Archive Standards (2020). Dalcour Maclaren will register the works with the Online AccesS to the Index of archaeological investigationS (OASIS). A digital copy of this report and any appropriate associated documentation from the archive will be made available upon approval of this report. Archaeological observation, investigation and recording was undertaken from the 27th to 29th June 2022 on behalf of Anglian Water on land south of Chapel Brampton, Northamptonshire. The monitoring was maintained in order to identify and characterise any archaeological resource present. Regarding the scope of works undertaken, the archaeological monitoring was fit for purpose and has recorded a single gully feature within the easement, as well as recovered a small assemblage of archaeological material. Remains of a potential mill were not recorded during these works, however, it is likely any remains of this, should they be preserved, are concentrated at the junction of Northampton and Welford Roads where the junction meets the river, and the works for this scheme did not intrude into this area. As aforementioned, the monitoring work recorded a single shallow gully feature, given the limited extent of the feature exposed and it's isolation from any further remains it is of limited interpretative value. The impact to this feature within the easement from excavation for the pipe will be limited, and the feature will likely survive to it's greater extent beyond the limit of excavation recorded. The small assemblage of finds attests to the archaeological activity previously recorded in the environs to the site. Given that the finds are residual in nature and may be present on site via hillwash, bioturbation or manuring, they are limited in significance and interpretative value. Dalcour Maclaren does not make recommendations for further analysis or reporting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».