MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6901741007 · doi:10.60692/3esfc-cve96

Relationships between spike morphology, hordeins and altitude within Ethiopian barley, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae)

2008· article· en· W6901741007 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreater South Information System · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAltitude (triangle)Effects of high altitude on humansHordeum vulgareHordeinMorphology (biology)Low altitude

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

HereditasVolume 110, Issue 3 p. 203-209 Open Access Relationships between spike morphology, hordeins and altitude within Ethiopian barley, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae) ZEMEDE ASFAW, Corresponding Author ZEMEDE ASFAW Department of Biology, Addis Abeba University, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia*Department of Biology, Addis Abeba University, P.O. Box 3434, Addis Abeba, EthiopiaSearch for more papers by this author ZEMEDE ASFAW, Corresponding Author ZEMEDE ASFAW Department of Biology, Addis Abeba University, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia*Department of Biology, Addis Abeba University, P.O. Box 3434, Addis Abeba, EthiopiaSearch for more papers by this author First published: June 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1989.tb00782.xCitations: 4AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract Three sets of data, i.e., morphological (relating to the spike), biochemical (hordein), and environmental (altitude), were recovered on a sample of the presently cultivated landrace varieties of Ethiopian barley. Application of a computer programme involving multivariate statistical analyses uncovered the latent but significant associations among the three parameters. Thus, associations were evident between morphology and hordeins, morphology and altitude, and hordeins and altitude. The magnitude of the observed association was highest between morphology and hordeins (R2=46 %) and lowest between hordeins and altitude (R2=5 %). Each morphological character studied was identified with one or a few hordein bands, while altitude was associated with a few hordein bands and some spike characters. In some cases a character was found to be simultaneously correlated with two characters from the other parameters. These results are interpreted as arising from linkages, accumulations, and/or pleiotropic effects of some genes. A deeper understanding of the nature of the relationships indicated by these results requires further studies involving pure lines for individual characters. References Aberg, E. and Wiebe, G. A. 1948. Taxonomic value of characters in cultivated barley. USDA Technical Bulletin 942, p. 88. Alkamper, J. von 1974. The influence of altitude on yield and quality in cereals in Ethiopia. Z. Acker- und Pflanzenbau. 140: 184– 189. Cooke, R. J.. Cliff. E. M. and Draper, S. R. 1983. Barley cultivar characterization by electrophoresis. II. Classification of hordein electrophoregrams. J Natn. Inst. Agric. Hot. 16: 179– 206. H. Doll 1977. Storage proteins in cereals. –In: Genetic Diversity in Plants (eds A. Muhammed, R. Askel and R. C. Von Borstel),p. 357– 347. Doll, H. and Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Hordein variation in wild {Hordeum spontaneum) and cultivated {Hordeum vulgare) barley. Can. J. Genet. Cxtol. 21: 391– 404. Endashaw Bekele. 1984. Relationships between morphological variance, gene diversity and flavonoid pattern in the landrace populations of Ethiopian barley. Hereditas 100: 271– 294. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics ( 2nd ed.). –Longman Group. England . FRöst, S., Holm, G. and Asker, S. 1975. Flavonoid pattern and phylogeny of barley. Hereditas 79: 133– 142. Giese, H., Andersen, B. and Doll, H. 1983. Synthesis of the major storage protein, hordein, in barley. Planta 159: 60– 65. Jonassen, I. 1980. Characterization of Hiproly barley. I. Isolation and characterization of two water soluble high-lysine proteins. Carlsberg Res. Coinmun. 45: 47– 58. Metcalfe, D. R. Chiko, A W., Martens, J. W. and Tekuaz, A. 1978. Reaction of Ethiopian barleys to Canadian barley pathogens. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 885– 890. Mulugeta Negassa 1985. Geographical distribution and genotypic diversity of resistance to powdery mildew of barley in Ethiopia. Hereditas 102: 113– 121. Munck, L. 1980. The genetic basis for protein improvement in cereals. Proc. XIV Int. Congr. Genet. Moscow 1978, vol. I, book one: 249– 260. Munck, L. Karlsson, K. E., Hagberg, A. and Eggum, B. O. 1970. Gene for improved nutritional value in barley seed protein. Science 168: 985– 987. Munck, L., Karlsson, K. E. and Hagberg, A. 1971. Selection and characterization of a high-protein, high-lysine variety from the world barley collection. –In: Barley Genetics II (ed R. A. Nilan), p. 544– 558. Munck, L., Tallberg, A., Knutsson, P., Eaker, D. and Eggum, B. 1973. Comparison of high-lysine genes and mutants in barley and maize. –In: Proc. CIMMYT-Purdue Symp. on Protein Quality in Maize, p. 418– 431. Munck, L., Bang-Olsen, K. and Stilling, B. 1985. Genome adjustment by breeding to balance yield defects in high-lysine mutants of barley. –Proc. Int. Symp. EUCARPIA. Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding, p. 1– 12. Nevo, E., Zohary, D., Brown, A. H. D. and Haber, M. 1979. Genetic diversity and environmental association of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, in Israel. Evolution 33: 815– 833. Nevo, E.. Beiles, A.. Storch, N., Doll, H. and Andersen, B. 1983. Microgeographic edaphic differentiation in hordein polymorphism of wild barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 64: 123– 132. Nevo, E., Beiles, A. and Zohary, D. 1986. Genetic resources of wild barley in the Near East: Structure, evolution and application in breeding. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27: 355– 380. Orlov, A. A. and Åberg, E. 1941. The classification of subspecies and varieties of Hordeum sativum Jensen. Extract and translation from A. A. Orlov(1936). Hordeum L., Barley. –In: Flora of Cultivated Plants. 2, Moscow. Leningrad, p. 1– 18. Pandey, B.P. 1980. Economic Botany.–S. Chand and Co., New Delhi , p. 474. Preaux, G. and Lontie, R. 1975. The proteins of barley. –In: The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Proteins, (eds J. B. Harborne and C. F. Van Sumere), Annu. Proc. Phytochem. Soc. 11, Academic Press, London , p. 89– 111. Shewry, P. R. and Miflin, B. J. 1982. Genes for the storage protein of barley. Qualitas Plantarum. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 33: 251– 267. Shewry, P. R., Pratt, H. M. and Miflin, B. J. 1978. Varietal identification of single seeds of barley by analysis of hordein polypeptides. J. Sci. Fed. Agric. 29: 587– 596. Shewry, P. R., Pratt, H. M., Faulks, A. J., Palmer, S. and Miflin, B.J. 1979. The storage protein (hordein) polypeptide pattern of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in relation to varietal identification and disease resistance. J. Natn. Inst. Agric. Bot. 15: 34– 50. Wrigley, C. W. 1982. The use of genetics in understanding protein composition in wheat. Qualitas Plantarum. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 31: 205– 227. Zemede Asfaw 1988. Variation in the morphology of the spike within Ethiopian barley, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae). Acta Aerie. Scand. 38: 277– 288. Zemede Asfaw 1989. Variation in hordein polypeptide pattern within Ethiopian barley, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae). Hereditas 110: 185– 191. Citing Literature Volume110, Issue3June 1989Pages 203-209 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,444

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,115 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreater South Information SystemMême sujetPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsTravaux en français237 207