Metadata record for the article: Crown-Like Structures in Breast Adipose Tissue of Breast Cancer Patients: Associations with CD68 Expression, Obesity, Metabolic Factors and Prognosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<b>Summary</b><br> This metadata record provides details of the data supporting the claims of the related article: “Crown-Like Structures in Breast Adipose Tissue of Breast Cancer Patients: Associations with CD68 Expression, Obesity, Metabolic Factors and Prognosis”. The related study examined associations of H&E and CD68-detected crown-like structures of the breast (CLS-B) with clinicopathologic features using chi-squared tests, with metabolic factors using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and with disease free and overall survival using Cox regression models. Type of data: clinical data Subject of data: <i>Homo sapiens; </i>antibodies Sample size: 535 Population characteristics: The population comprised a consecutive cohort of women who underwent treatment for operable breast cancer at Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Canada) between June 1989 and June 1996. Women were included if they had age less than 75 years, complete resection of breast cancer and axillary dissection for previously untreated breast cancer. Women were excluded if they had prior malignancy (except cervical in situ lesion or nonmelanoma skin cancer), a serious coexisting medical condition, including diabetes, use of medications that modified key study variables, or inability to provide consent. Recruitment: Consecutive women were recruited from those women undergoing surgery for breast cancer (see above). Women were excluded if they had prior malignancy (except cervical in situ lesion or nonmelanoma skin cancer), a serious coexisting medical condition, including diabetes, use of medications that modified key study variables, or inability to provide consent. No systematic source of bias was identified. <b>Data access</b> All data underlying the claims of the related article are contained in the tab-delimited text file ‘NRF database.txt’. These data are housed on institutional storage and are not publicly available in order to protect patient privacy, as no Ethics approval to share data was received. However, the data will be made available upon request to individual investigators. Data enquiries should be addressed to the corresponding author. <b>Corresponding author(s) for this study</b> Dr. Martin C. Chang, University of Vermont Medical Center, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Main Pavilion 1st Floor, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401. Martin.Chang@uvmhealth.org <br> <b>Study approval </b> Ethics oversight was provided by Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Research Ethics Board. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for both the original prospective trial, and for the use of all data in future research-ethics-board-approved research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,090 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».