MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6901913941 · doi:10.6082/h522-7289

We Don't Breathe Alone: Forms of Encounter in Anglophone North America since the 1970s

2018· dissertation· en· W6901913941 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueKnowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDebilityPoliticsCommodificationReproductionBreathing gasAtmosphere (unit)Race (biology)Racism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"We Don't Breathe Alone: Forms of Encounter in Anglophone North America since the 1970s" tracks the emergence of an aesthetics both formed by and about breathing in North American literature and film from the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The dissertation argues that breathing comes to articulate self- and world-making that cannot be defined through speech or action. Breathing operates across various avant-garde and minoritarian aesthetics as the foremost concept for configuring multiple kinds and scales of encounter—with oneself, with the world, with alterity, and with finitude—under conditions of openness or vulnerability. Even when it appears to be an individual process, breathing implicates a milieu and its human and nonhuman organisms; hence, we don't breathe alone.,The aesthetics of breathing intensifies at a historical moment when the resources necessary for the reproduction of life, notably breathable air, are endangered, unequally distributed, monetized, and weaponized. Since the 2014 murder by chokehold of Eric Garner, the phrase "I can't breathe" has denounced the asphyxiating atmosphere in which African Americans have declared that black lives matter. Since the 1970s, rates of respiratory afflictions like asthma, allergies, and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) have exploded. The epidemiologies of these afflictions reveal patterns of disability and debility that stress inequalities pertaining to race, class, age, and gender. Although part of a longer history of international conflicts, biological warfare has been increasingly used as a tool for domestic law enforcement, such that it has become a symbol of the repression of progressive political struggles. The rarity of pure air under pollution has concurrently led to its unprecedented valuation and turned breathing into a luxury activity.,Breathing aesthetics are bound up in the history of social movements that have denounced structures of oppression and exploitation and speculated more livable worlds. Contemporary writers and filmmakers mobilize breathing to capture the experience of literal and figurative toxicities (e.g. atmospheric pollution or ambient racism, sexism, homophobia, and ableism) and from there to reimagine life in common. I tackle the sociopolitical and environmental shaping of embodiment and experience using a critical grammar indebted to gender studies, feminist theory, queer theory, critical race studies, disability studies, environmental studies, science studies, and medical theory.,The archive I assemble spans traditions, movements, and trends in Anglophone, North American writing (prose and verse) and film that derive sociopolitical force from an aesthetic engagement with breathing. The archive includes Asian American and Canadian prose and verse (Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Fred Wah), queer life writing (Dodie Bellamy, CA Conrad, Bob Flanagan), black and indigenous feminist prose and verse (Toni Cade Bambara, Linda Hogan), African American speculative fiction (Samuel Delany, Renee Gladman), and cinema-vérité (Frederick Wiseman, Allan King). I frame the literature and cinema on which I center as experimental to highlight the way their creators, while rejecting scientific positivism, experiment with form, genre, and point of view as they develop protocols to address problems of contemporary living. ,"We Don't Breathe Alone" examines the aesthetics of embodiment and experience in light of environmental concerns. My project has an affinity with ecocriticism at the same time as it complicates the criterion that a novel, poem, or film's worth hinges on its capacity to raise the reader or viewer's awareness of environmental degradation. The objects I explore compel us to consider the social and political worlds generated through breathing while emphasizing the forces that compromise the fantasy of a liberal individual capable of taking action or speaking out. Recognizing respiration as a social and political process also expands beyond visual and aural registers a study of "minor" aesthetics that pays attention to subjectivities that do not fit a sovereign model. "We Don't Breathe Alone" considers contemporary literature and film in light of the notion that subjectivity is in excess of individuals and their bodies, specifically in depleted or oppressive environments.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,826
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle