MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6902083930 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21980165

Exploring Reuse or Dereliction of a Cold War Era Nuclear Bunker: An Observational Study of Canada's Diefenbunker

2023· dissertation· en· W6902083930 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueNuclear Issues and Defense
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNuclear weaponBunkerCivil defenseGovernment (linguistics)PreparednessNuclear warfareEmergency managementNational security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Exploring Reuse or Dereliction of a Cold War Era Nuclear Bunker: An Observational Study of Canada's Diefenbunker by Christian Faize Canaan January 4, 2023 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master’s degree in Disaster and Emergency Management Research Supervisor: Jack L. Rozdilsky, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Disaster and Emergency Management, York University Past civil defence efforts are the foundation for modern day disaster and emergency management. Today, approximately 60 years later, at a few locations in Canada remnants of Cold-War era civil defence efforts still exist. Located outside of Ottawa, the Diefenbunker is a large underground nuclear bunker complex that once served as the location for Canada’s Federal government to continue operations in the event the national capitol was targeted in a nuclear attack. While the existential threat of nuclear war was a national security priority that served as a catalyst for preparedness efforts during the mid-twentieth century, until recently awareness of the horrors of nuclear war has not been of the greatest concern or priority. During 2022, that began to change as the world watched with dread as Russia, one of the nine nations with a nuclear armed military, invaded Ukraine and on numerous occasions directly and indirectly threatened use of nuclear weapons. For 2023, it is in the range of possibilities that nuclear weapons may be used in warfare for the first time in 78 years. What was old is again becoming new. The once obscure topic of nuclear war bunkers is increasingly becoming a subject area of more concern related to emergency preparedness. The question asked in this study is “What are the lessons learned from Canada’s Diefenbunker that can help us to understand the opportunities leading to repurposing or the barriers leading to dereliction for large-scale Cold War era nuclear bunkers?” The Background Chapter of this study provides information about the past and present uses of the Diefenbunker site. The literature review provides a context for civil defence and the risk of nuclear war. The methodology used in this study was qualitative, observational, unstructured, and participatory. The Findings Chapter addresses the data collected, which in this case was photographs, and the data were sorted according to themes derived from literature and observational fieldwork. Ten images from the Spring 2022 fieldwork at the Diefenbunker are highlighted and then discussed in the context of four key themes. ‘Upkeep and maintenance’ and ‘time travel’ are themes which represent barriers for adaptive reuse of former Cold War nuclear bunker sites. ‘Continuity of government and civil defence’ and ‘uncomfortable sites’ are themes offering opportunities for adaptive reuse. This study also considered the case of reuse of Vienna’s Flak Towers to highlight the importance of creativity in finding new and novel uses for former military structures. Due to the characteristics of large-scale devastation and human suffering associated with any use of nuclear weapons, sites supporting aspects of nuclear warfighting are deeply uncomfortable in nature. However, the fate of former Cold War nuclear bunkers can be addressed in positive ways by promoting their adaptive reuse through application of creativity. Canada’s Diefenbunker is an example showing how creativity, planning, hard work, and perseverance were used to convert a nuclear bunker into a Cold War museum. The significance of the Diefenbunker is that it provides a ‘best in class’ example of how adaptive reuse can repurpose a former nuclear war preparedness and response military site. It is also one of the few examples of a site that showcases historical aspects of the disaster and emergency management profession. In conclusion, it would be a shame if our disaster and emergency management Cold War heritage of nuclear war civil defence is lost through neglect and subsequent dereliction.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,193

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,406
Tête enseignante GPT0,374
Écart entre enseignants0,032 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshareMême sujetNuclear Issues and DefenseTravaux en français237 207