The effect of rigid tape on wrist postures during tree planting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Taping has been suggested to reduce the incidence of tendinopathy in tree planters. However, the ability of taping to reduce wrist postures during planting has not yet been formally evaluated. The primary aim was to test the effect of rigid taping on wrist postures during tree planting tasks. Eleven tree planters planted up to 50 trees in three conditions: no-tape (NT), tape-on-the-dorsum-of-the-hand (T1) and tape-on-the-thumb (T2) in a randomised cross-over, within-participant, repeat-measures design. Electrogoniometers (EG) recorded continuous wrist postures. Digital video recordings were used to segment EG traces of each planting cycle (one planted tree) into 4 kinematically distinct Phases. The tree and shovel wrist were analysed separately. Tree-wrist peak ulnar deviation and frequency of shovel-wrist awkward frontal plane postures were significantly reduced in the T2 condition. Taping may be effective at reducing non-neutral postures and should be researched further to determine its effectiveness in reducing tree planting injuries. Practitioner summary: The effect of rigid taping on wrist postures during tree planting has not yet been formally evaluated. A randomised cross-over, within-participant, repeat measures design was used to evaluate the effect of rigid taping on wrist postures during planting. Thumb rigid taping appeared to reduce wrist range of motion during planting. KEY POINTSTaping of the thumb reduced peak ulnar deviation of the tree wrist and frequency of awkward frontal plane postures of the shovel wrist.While taping of the dorsum of the hand appeared to be more restrictive, it did not significantly reduce wrist movement; this is likely because only its effect on sagittal plane posture was assessed which had a higher variance.Upon application, tape appeared to restrict voluntary movement patterns, decreased voluntary grip force exertion and physically restrain wrist movement.Overall, rigid tape was found to be an acceptable intervention for the tree planting occupation, with financial costs and perceived effort identified as the primary barriers to acceptability. Taping of the thumb reduced peak ulnar deviation of the tree wrist and frequency of awkward frontal plane postures of the shovel wrist. While taping of the dorsum of the hand appeared to be more restrictive, it did not significantly reduce wrist movement; this is likely because only its effect on sagittal plane posture was assessed which had a higher variance. Upon application, tape appeared to restrict voluntary movement patterns, decreased voluntary grip force exertion and physically restrain wrist movement. Overall, rigid tape was found to be an acceptable intervention for the tree planting occupation, with financial costs and perceived effort identified as the primary barriers to acceptability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».