Additional file 1 of Two decades of molecular surveillance in Senegal reveal rapid changes in known drug resistance mutations over time
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Supplementary Material 1: Fig. S1 Sample sizes for SNP-based molecular surveillance. Sample size per year per region for the SNP-based molecular surveillance. Fig. S2 SNP-based molecular surveillance in Pikine for A) Pfcrt, B) Pfdhfr, C) Pfdhps and D) Pfmdr1. The Pfdhfr I174L and Pfkelch13 SNPs were not examined in Pikine. Error bars indicate two binomial standard deviations from the mean. X’s denote years where samples were collected but the mutation was not observed. Gaps in the data were because samples were not collected for that year. Fig. S3 SNP-based molecular surveillance in Thiès for A) Pfcrt, B) Pfdhfr, C) Pfdhps, D) Pfmdr1, and E) Pfkelch13. Error bars indicate two binomial standard deviations from the mean. X’s denote years where samples were collected but the mutation was not observed. Gaps in the data were because samples were not collected for that year. Fig. S4 SNP-based molecular surveillance in Kédougou for A) Pfcrt, B) Pfdhfr, C) Pfdhps, D) Pfmdr1, and E) Pfkelch13. Error bars indicate two binomial standard deviations from the mean. X’s denote years where samples were collected but the mutation was not observed. Gaps in the data were because samples were either not collected or not genotyped for that year. Fig. S5 Down-sampled estimates of Pfcrt K76T for A) Thies, B) Pikine, C) Kédougou, and E) Diourbel. In blue are the estimated allele frequencies and 95% confidence intervals obtained from the raw data. In grey are average allele frequencies and 95% confidence intervals after down-sampling the data from each site-year to 29 samples, which was the smallest number of samples collected across all examined site-years involving Thies, Pikine, Kédougou, and Diourbel. Fig. S6 A) Frequency of Pfdhfr triple sensitive (N51, C59, S108) parasites. B) Frequency of “quadruple” (Pfdhfr triple mutant + Pfdhps A437G) parasites. The scatterplots show the observed frequencies and their 95% binomial confidence interval. Model predictions from a calibrated generalized additive model and the 95% confidence intervals are shown in orange. The model was calibrated with data from Pikine, Thiès, Diourbel, and Kédougou (denoted with circles). The data from Kolda and Kaolack (denoted with X) were not used for model calibration. Fig. S7 Sampling distribution for our whole genome sequence collection (A). Grey indicates that the sample came from Thiès. Green indicates the sample came from Kédougou. Sampling distributions for B) the Pfcrt genomic region, C) the Pfdhfr genomic region, and D) the Pfdhps genomic regions. For B and D, blue denotes samples with the sensitive allele and red indicates those with the resistance allele. For C, red denotes samples that are Pfdhfr triple mutant, blue indicates those that are Pfdhfr triple sensitive, and orange indicates those with a mix of resistant and sensitive alleles at the three examined Pfdhfr loci. Fig. S8 SNPs used to define genomic haplotypes. Genomic haplotypes surrounding the wild-type mutations: A) Pfcrt K76, B) Pfdhfr C59, C) Pfdhps A437 and the drug resistance mutations: D) Pfcrt K76T, E) Pfdhfr C59R, F) Pfdhps A437G. 171 samples and 173 SNPs were examined for Pfcrt, 170 samples and 85 SNPs for Pfdhfr, 182 samples and 83 SNPs for Pfdhps. Each row represents a sample. The left most column indicates whether the sample was collected before or during 2014 (green) or after 2014 (yellow). Alleles corresponding to the 3D7 reference are indicated by light blue and alleles corresponding to the alternative allele are indicated by dark blue. White corresponds to missing data. The orange boxes highlight the boundaries of the Pfcrt (A/D), Pfdhfr (B/E), and Pfdhps (C/F) genes. Fig. S9 Evidence of Hard and Soft Sweeps H12 (blue, left y-axis) and H2/H1 (orange, right y-axis) statistics for A) chromosome 7 and B) chromosome 8. The dotted green lines show the location of Pfcrt or Pfdhps. Table 1. Sample sizes for SNP-based molecular surveillance. Table 2. Regional and health facility IPTp coverage where samples were collected: Pikine (Deggo), Thiès (SLAP), Diourbel (Sessene), Kaolack (P. Assainies), Kolda (Bagadadji), and Kédougou (Bandafassi). Table 3. Regional SMC and health facility coverage where samples were collected: Pikine (Deggo), Thiès (SLAP), Diourbel (Sessene), Kaolack (P. Assainies), Kolda (Bagadadji), and Kédougou (Bandafassi).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,029 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,821 | 0,108 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».