MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Charity Open Access Fund (COAF) open access spend and compliance monitoring: 2017-18

2019· dataset· en· 0 citations· W6902383660 sur OpenAlex· 10.6084/m9.figshare.8010617.v1

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles ont qualifié ce travail de métarecherche. Il appartient au noyau consensuel du domaine.

strate : about_only · poids de sondage : 3321.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8T1
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Dataset of a funder consortium's open access spend, article processing charges, licences and repository compliance; the object is open access publishing and funder compliance.

GPT-5.6 (high)T1
genre : other
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

The dataset studies open-access publishing expenditure and compliance practices.

Grok 4.5T1
genre : other
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Dataset of open-access spend and licence/repository compliance for funded papers; scholarly communication is the object.

Résumé

This dataset contains details of the 2017-2018 Charity Open Access Fund (COAF) open access spend. During this period the members of COAF were Wellcome Trust, Versus Arthritis, British Heart Foundation, Bloodwise, Cancer Research UK and Parkinson’s UK. In addition to reporting spend, the data has been analysed through our “compliance monitoring” tool (developed for us by Cottage Labs) to help us determine programmatically whether the paper is in the Europe PMC repository and what licence (if any) is attached to the article. The dataset includes information when an article processing charge (APC) was levied to the COAF fund. If an author has self-archived a paper, this information is not included in this dataset. Equally, data are not included in cases where a researcher (based at an institution not in receipt of a COAF block grant) received a supplement to their grant to cover OA publishing costs. We hope that this data will be of use to help better understand the cost of OA publishing. If through use of this data you identify errors or believe the status of an article to be incorrect please notify Diego Baptista (d.baptista[at]welcome.ac.uk). We will endeavour to investigate these issues and correct errors where identified. Corrections to the dataset will be published as a new version of the dataset along with a note explaining the changes.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Figshare
Thématique
Domaine
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
ReceiptPublishingCompliance (psychology)InstitutionCover (algebra)PublicationQuarter (Canadian coin)Data access
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui