MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6902401038 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27303768

Eight-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Canadian hepatitis C virus-infected, treatment-naïve, compensated cirrhotic people: CREST study

2024· article· en· W6902401038 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHepatitis C virus research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHepatitis CHepatitis C virusAdverse effectLiver diseasePopulationDiseaseClinical endpointHepatitis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Aim: Evaluation of the real-world effectiveness and safety of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in treatment-naive Canadian individuals with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis. Patients & methods: Analysis of Canadian people enrolled in the CREST study. Primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) rates; safety end points were also assessed. Results: Fifty-three individuals received ≥1 dose of G/P. In the modified analysis set (MAS; which excluded those who discontinued G/P [n = 1] or with missing SVR12 data [n = 12]), 98% (39/40) achieved SVR12; 1 person experienced virologic failure. No individuals experienced or discontinued treatment due to a serious adverse event. Conclusion: In this real-world Canadian cohort, 8-week G/P was well tolerated, with SVR12 rates similar to those in clinical trials. Clinical research studies have shown that a high proportion of individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and with advanced liver disease who had not been treated before, were cured after treatment for 8–12 weeks with the oral medication glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P). However, data in real-life are limited. To support these studies, we present the effectiveness and safety of G/P given for 8 weeks, in a real-life setting, in Canadian people with HCV infection and advanced liver disease who have not previously received HCV treatment. Our population included people who use drugs, those with excessive alcohol use and those with mental health conditions. These individuals represent a population at high risk for HCV infection and transmission. Our findings show that treatment with G/P for 8 weeks was effective and well tolerated in the general population as well as in vulnerable individuals. The results in this real-world setting were similar to those seen in clinical research studies, and more importantly in populations that are often underrepresented. This supports the use of G/P for treating HCV infection in underserved populations, which will be key to achieving global HCV elimination. Hepatitis C remains a global health concern. In Canada it is estimated that approximately 194,500 people are still living with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection despite widespread availability of highly effective and well tolerated therapies. The World Health Organization has set a goal for the elimination of HCV as a public health concern by 2030. There are limited real-world data in patients with HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis (CC). This study examined the real-world effectiveness and safety of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in 53 Canadian, treatment-naive people with CC, including those with drug use disorder, excessive alcohol use and mental health conditions. In the overall population, 98% of patients achieved sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12). SVR12 rates remained high in patients including those with substance use disorder, excessive alcohol use, depression, FibroScan® ≥12.5 kPa and FibroScan >20 kPa or platelet count <150 × 109/l. Most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (26%, n = 14) and headache (11%, n = 6), with no serious or drug-related AEs reported and no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Our findings confirm the effectiveness and safety of G/P therapy in treatment-naive people with HCV genotype 1–6 and CC, including those who may be underserved in clinical trials. If strategies to optimize screening for HCV infection and linkage to care are implemented, we can be confident that an 8-week course of treatment with G/P can be offered to patients with CC, irrespective of co-morbidities and concomitant medications.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,097
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,196

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,279 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Même sujetHepatitis C virus research→Travaux en français237 207→