MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6902405476 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28681862

Additional file 5 of A stress-dependent TDP-43 SUMOylation program preserves neuronal function

2025· dataset· en· W6902405476 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2025
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSUMO proteinHEK 293 cellsWestern blotSodium arseniteBlotArsenitePDZ domainCell culture

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Supplementary Material 5. Fig. S1: Characterizing stress responsive TDP-43 SUMOylation. (A) Representative immunofluorescent microscopy images of TDP-43 and G3BP1 and western blot from SUMOylation assays testing whether various stressors that cause TDP-43 aggregation induce TDP-43 SUMOylation: NaAsO2 (250 μM), D-Sorbitol (400 mM), NaCl (300 mM), Heat Shock (42 °C) in HEK293T (Immunofluorescence) and HEK293T HA-SUMO2 stable cells (biochemistry). One-Way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *p <0.05, **p <0.005, ****p <0.0001. (B) Representative western blot from SUMOylation assays testing the selectivity of SUMO paralogs to SUMOylate TDP-43 in response to 1 hour sodium arsenite (250 μM) in HEK293T cells with transient expression of SUMO paralogs. (C) Representative GFP-Trap SUMOylation assay depicting increased SUMOylation with ALS-causing Q331K mutation in response to 250 µM sodium arsenite stress in HEK293T cells with transient expression of HA-SUMO2. Unpaired T-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to stressed TDP-43-GFP (WT) condition, *p <0.05. (D) Representative images of SUMO2/3 and TDP-43 in the nucleus of mouse cortical neurons (7 DIV) in unstressed and 1 hour sodium arsenite (250 μM) stressed conditions. (E) Representative control imaged from Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) in mouse primary cortical neurons. Scale bar = 20 μm. (N = 4). (F) Representative western blot and quantification from GFP-Trap SUMOylation assays testing the kinetics of TDP-43 SUMOylation in response to sodium arsenite stress (250 μM) and its relationship to insoluble phosphorylated TDP-43 in HEK293T HA-SUMO2 stable cells. (N = 3). Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to 3-hour stress condition. Linear regression analysis of Relative SUMOylation against time in response to stress. (G) Representative dose-response assay to detect TDP-43 SUMOylation after 1 hour of sodium arsenite stress (1 = 250 μM, 1/2 = 125 μM, 1/4 = 62.5 μM, etc.) in HEK293T HA-SUMO2 stable cells. One-Way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test. Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to 250 μM sodium arsenite (1) condition, *p <0.05, **p <0.005, ****p <0.0001. Fig. S2: Analysis of TDP-43 lysine to arginine mutation at K136 and K408. (A) Representative fluorescent microscopy images expressing TDP-43-GFP with K136R and RNA binding deficient (5FL) mutations in HEK293T cells. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Predicted alignment error output from AlphaFold3 prediction of TDP-43 structure (residues 1-414) interacting with UG (x6) RNA (residues 415-426). (C) Predicted structure of TDP-43 with annotated domains. Color annotates predicted local difference test (plDDT)j scores. NTD = N-annotated domains. Color annotates predicted local difference test (plDDT)j scores. NTD = N-Terminal Domain; RRM1/RRM2 = RNA Recognition Motif 1/2; CTD = C-Terminal Domain. (D) Predicted structure of TDP-43K408R highlighting no addition of secondary structure at the C-terminus surrounding residue 408 upon mutation. (E) Representative image and quantification of TDP-43-GFP expression in HEK293T cells denoting mislocalization in a subset of cells overexpressing TDP-43 with K408R mutation. (N = 3) Student’s T-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Fig. S3: Characterization of SUMO2 fusion to the C-terminus of TDP-43. (A) Representative western blot and quantification of TDP-43-HA and TDP-43-SUMO2-HA expression in HEK293T cells. (N = 3) 2-way ANOVA with Fishers LSD test. Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to unstressed TDP-43-HA condition. *p <0.05, **p <0.005. (B) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images and quantifications of TDP-43-HA and TDP-43-SUMO2-HA fusion in HEK293T cells in response to cellular stress (250 μM sodium arsenite for 1 hour). (N = 3) Student’s T-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to unstressed TDP-43-HA condition, *p <0.05. Stress granule size is presented as nested data where each data point is a stress granule across 12-15 cells per biological replicate and the median stress granule size is presented with 95% CI error bars. T-test for nested data was performed (N =3), **p <0.01. Fig. S4: Generation of the TDP-43K408R mouse line. (A) Schematic of the knock in approach to edit the endogenous Tardbp to express TDP-43K408R. (B) Schematic of LNA probe based genotyping approach and allelic discrimination assay to genotype TDP-43K408R mouse line. (C) Sex and mendelian ratios of F3 generation TDP-43K408R mice from K408R/+ and K408R/+ breeding pairs used to generate behaviour and histology cohorts. Observed vs Expected statistical analysis assuming an expected 1:1 ratio sex ratio and 1:2:1 mendelian ratio; no significant differences observed. Fig. S5: Characterizing the stress response in TDP-43K408R primary cortical neuron cultures. (A) Classification and quantification of G3BP1 stress granule (SG) intensity in response to 1 hour sodium arsenite stress (250 μM) and recovery. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (N = 5 per genotype) 2-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons analysis. *p <0.05, ***p <0.0005. (B) Quantification of the localization of G3BP1 stress granules (SGs) in response to 1 hour sodium arsenite stress (250 μM) and recovery. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (N = 5 per genotype) 2-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons analysis. ***p <0.0005. (C) Quantification of the percentage of neurons with positive TDP-43 nuclear foci in G3BP1 stress granule positive and G3BP1 stress granule negative neurons in response to 1 hour sodium arsenite stress (250 μM) and recovery. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (N = 5 per genotype) 2-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons analysis. ***p <0.0005. (D) Quantification of the average number of TDP-43 nuclear foci in neurons positive for TDP-43 nuclear foci in response to 1 hour sodium arsenite stress (250 μM) and recovery. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (N = 5 per genotype) 2-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons analysis. *p <0.05. For all analyses wild type neurons are presented in grey and K408R/K408R neurons are presented in purple. Fig. S6: Characterizing the effect of blocking TDP-43 SUMOylation in primary cortical neurons. (A) Quantification of RIPA and UREA fractions from mouse primary cortical neurons (7 DIV) during stress (1 hour 250 μM sodium arsenite) and recovery related to Fig. 3B. N = 3-5, 2-Way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test. Data presented as mean ± SEM, * p <0.05, ** p <0.005. (B-D) Representative immunofluorescent images of primary cortical neurons (7 DIV) treated with 250 μM sodium arsenite for 1 hour then recovered for 3 hours to induce TDP-43 foci formation to analyze colocalization with nuclear markers: (B) HSPA1L was visualized through lentiviral transduction of HSPA1L-mRuby2; (C) paraspeckle marker PSPC-1; and (D) Ubiquitin. (N = 3). At least 10 cells positive for TDP-43 foci and foci of interest were imaged and analyzed per replicate. (E) Quantification of primary cortical neurons with TDP-43 mislocalization in response to repeated stress (30 minutes 250 μM sodium arsenite) and recovery (30 minutes washout) related to Fig. 3E. (N = 3) 2-Way ANOVA with Fishers LSD test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (F) Representative western blot and analysis of RIPA soluble and UREA fractions from primary cortical neurons in response to chronic stress (30 hours of 15 μM sodium arsenite) and recovery. Data presented as mean ± SEM relative to WT for each condition. 2-Way ANOVA with Fishers LSD test. *p <0.05, **p <0.005. For all analyses wild type neurons are presented in Grey and K408R/K408R neurons are presented in purple. Fig S7: General wellness of TDP-43K408R mice during development and aging. (A) Genotype and sex composition of mice subject to behaviour testing. (B) Weight of mice at P21. Unpaired T-test (Males); Mann-Whitney test (Females and All) (C) Quantification of the duration hanging on a wire at P21. Mann-Whitney test (Males, Females, and All). (D) Survival curve for female TDP-43K408R mice (Males found in Fig. 5d). Curve comparisons analyzed using Log-Rank test and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. (E) Weights of male and female TDP-43K408R mice from 3 weeks to 64 weeks of age. Mixed-effects analysis. (F) Hindlimb clasping scores of male and female TDP-43K408R mice from 3 weeks to 64 weeks of age. Mixed-effects analysis. See Table S2 for raw data details on statistical tests. Data presented as mean ± SEM. For all analyses wild type mice are presented in grey and K408R/K408R mice are presented in purple. Fig. S8: Characterizing the cognitive and social behaviour of TDP-43K408R mice. Quantification of cognitive and social behaviors in the (A) Light/Dark Box, (B) Y-maze, (C) 3-Chamber Social Interaction, (D) Marble Burying, and (E) Tail Suspension behaviour tasks at 2, 9, and 16 months of age (2MO, 9MO, and 16MO, respectively) in male and female TDP-43K408R mice. All behaviour tests were analyzed with a Mixed-Effects Model with Tukey’s multiple comparison analysis, see Table S2. Data presented as mean ± SEM. For all analyses wild type mice are presented in grey and K408R/K408R mice are presented in purple. Fig. S9: Characterizing the motor behaviour of TDP-43K408R mice. Quantification of motor abilities in the (A) Hanging Wire, (B) Grip Strength, and (C) Rotarod behaviour tasks at 2, 9, and 16 months of age (2MO, 9MO, and 16MO, respectively) in male and female TDP-43K408R mice. (D) Digigait behaviour tasks at 16 months of age in male and female TDP-43K408R mice. Behaviour tests were analyzed with 2-Way ANOVA or Mixed-Effects Models, see Table S2. Data presented as mean ± SEM. For all analyses wild type mice are presented in grey and K408R/K408R mice are presented in purple. Fig. S10: Characterizing the activity of TDP-43K408R mice. Quantification of (A) total distance traveled (cm) and time in center (s) during the Open Field behaviour test and (B) the relative ambulatory activity (males) of TDP-43K408R mice at 2, 9, and 16 mon

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,895
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,149

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,8950,247

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Travaux en français237 207→