Tending our garden: Capacity building in the Myaamia community
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Language revitalization, as a movement or emerging field in the United States, is only approximately three decades in the making for most tribal communities. Its beginnings appear to coincide with the passage of the 1990 Native American Languages Act and the voices of alarm from linguists’ and native communities that attempt to raise awareness of the impact the loss of languages will have on communities. Three decades is just enough time to get a glimpse of the complex social, political and cultural issues that face tribal communities as they attempt to breathe new life into their languages. The Myaamia effort was born during this time of great uncertainty. Adding to this complexity was the reality that the Myaamia community did not have any remaining speakers by the mid 20th century, but extensive archival materials spread across the country and parts of Canada. With no models to follow for development of their unprecedented effort, a core of individuals set out to see what might be possible. This is a story of perseverance in the face of extensive obstacles. This personal account articulated by two individuals (Julie Olds and Daryl Baldwin), both citizens of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, and central to the launch of this effort, provide an in-depth account of one community’s attempt to claw their way into the present and set a course of accomplishments that would serve as the foundation for future growth. To aid in their understanding, Julie developed a metaphor of an unattended garden to help make sense of what they were up against. The garden metaphor drives a powerful intellectual space in this effort and is woven throughout this story as they recount their experiences and struggles to achieve something for the benefit of their community and tribal nation. A core value in Myaamia culture is the notion of ayaakwaamisioni ‘striving to achieve’ and this account is an example of that highly valued cultural attribute. Their journey, in their own words, is personal and reveling. They share it here in hopes that other communities will find parallels with their own language journeys and comfort in knowing that great accomplishments and benefits can in fact be realized from archive-based efforts in language and cultural revitalization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».