MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6903004724 · doi:10.7939/r3-rpq4-r561

Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancers Surveillance and Control in Alberta: A Conceptual Framework

2021· dissertation· en· W6903004724 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCancerOral cavityPublic healthCancer registryPopulationCancer preventionIncidence (geometry)Conceptual frameworkEpidemiologyConceptual model

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Oral cancer is a deadly public health issue worldwide with steady survival rate (50%-60%) for decades. Alberta is positioned as the 4th province for oral cancer incidence and related death prevalence in Canada. While the importance of early detection of oral cancer is well-documented, Alberta lacks a solid oral cancer screening and prevention strategy, and little is known about the province’s oral cavity cancer (OCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) status. Objectives: The overall goal of this PhD research was to generate a comprehensive knowledge of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in Alberta and develop a conceptual framework that may contribute to improving health of Albertans. Methods: A convergent mixed-method design was used wherein findings from quantitative and qualitative data analyses were merged. In phase 1, I conducted a scoping review to gather the existing information about OCC and OPC in Alberta including prevalence, demographics, mortality, morbidity, initiatives, allocated funding, and health system functioning. Phase 2 was a population level cross-sectional study, done for the first time in Alberta, to collect oral health profile data and associated risk factors for OCC and OPC from one of the most vulnerable demographic populations in Edmonton. In phase 3, I used a qualitative design to explore barriers to early detection of OCC and OPC in Alberta at the clinician-patient-system level using initial medical consultation notes of oral cancer patients. Results: In phase 1, Alberta Cancer Registry data (2005-2017) showed that most of the OCC and OPC lesions were diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage (i.e. III and IV), with a high percentage of them being in stage IV (OCC= 45.2%, OPC= 82.4%). Survival levels were lowest in rural and First Nations areas. Further, 35% of HPV-associated cancers were linked to oropharyngeal cancers, which were more prevalent in men and younger age groups. No routine public oral cancer screening program currently exists in Alberta. General practitioners/dentists refer patients to specialists, often with long waiting times. In phase 2, a total of 322 participants with a mean (SD) age of 49.3 (13.5) years completed the study. Among them, 71.1% were male, 48.1% were aboriginal, and 88.2% were single. The prevalence of oral cancerous lesions was 2.4%, which was higher than the recorded oral cancerous lesion prevalence in Canada (0.014%-1.42: 10,000) and Alberta (0.011%- 1.13:10,000). The clinical examinations indicated that 55 of the participants (17.1%) presented with potentially malignant oral lesions (PMOL), 176 (54.7%) of participants had oral lesion/inflammatory changes of oral mucosa, and 61.5% had high level of Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores. Risk of cancerous/PMOL was 1.68 times higher in participants living in shelters vs. those living alone. Oral lesion/inflammatory changes of the oral mucosa showed a significant association with cancerous/PMOL (p<0.001) compared to those who did not have cancerous/PMOL. In phase 3, five main categories were identified from qualitative analysis of 34 initial medical consultation notes of oral cancer patients: patient appraisal interval, help-seeking interval, formal diagnosis interval, pre-treatment interval, and contributing factors. In addition to biological factors, health-related behaviours, sociodemographic and tumor characteristics, other risk factors that negatively contributed to early detection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers included factors related to patients, providers, and healthcare system. Conclusions: The project successfully gathered the information from numerous resources to provide a comprehensive overview of what we already knew and shed light on dark and previously unseen corners of our provincial OCC and OPC challenges. This study revealed that OCC and OPC patients in Alberta continue to be diagnosed in stage IV, with high mortality rates. The prevalence of oral PMOL in the Boyle McCauley Street, an underserved community in Edmonton, was higher than that of the general population. Our study supports the need for developing opportunistic oral cancer screening and oral health promotion strategies in deprived communities and at -risk patients. The main contributors to total patient delay identified in this research were patients’ general lack of awareness about early symptoms of oral cancer and high-risk anatomic areas, inaccurate clinical judgement of attending physicians and dentists, and lengthy access to care. A sustainable plan is needed for enhancing public awareness and implementation of a solid curriculum for the training of medical and dental students.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,151
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,985

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0080,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,010
Communication savante0,0080,002
Science ouverte0,0040,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetHead and Neck Cancer StudiesTravaux en français237 207