Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancers Surveillance and Control in Alberta: A Conceptual Framework
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Oral cancer is a deadly public health issue worldwide with steady survival rate (50%-60%) for decades. Alberta is positioned as the 4th province for oral cancer incidence and related death prevalence in Canada. While the importance of early detection of oral cancer is well-documented, Alberta lacks a solid oral cancer screening and prevention strategy, and little is known about the province’s oral cavity cancer (OCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) status. Objectives: The overall goal of this PhD research was to generate a comprehensive knowledge of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in Alberta and develop a conceptual framework that may contribute to improving health of Albertans. Methods: A convergent mixed-method design was used wherein findings from quantitative and qualitative data analyses were merged. In phase 1, I conducted a scoping review to gather the existing information about OCC and OPC in Alberta including prevalence, demographics, mortality, morbidity, initiatives, allocated funding, and health system functioning. Phase 2 was a population level cross-sectional study, done for the first time in Alberta, to collect oral health profile data and associated risk factors for OCC and OPC from one of the most vulnerable demographic populations in Edmonton. In phase 3, I used a qualitative design to explore barriers to early detection of OCC and OPC in Alberta at the clinician-patient-system level using initial medical consultation notes of oral cancer patients. Results: In phase 1, Alberta Cancer Registry data (2005-2017) showed that most of the OCC and OPC lesions were diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage (i.e. III and IV), with a high percentage of them being in stage IV (OCC= 45.2%, OPC= 82.4%). Survival levels were lowest in rural and First Nations areas. Further, 35% of HPV-associated cancers were linked to oropharyngeal cancers, which were more prevalent in men and younger age groups. No routine public oral cancer screening program currently exists in Alberta. General practitioners/dentists refer patients to specialists, often with long waiting times. In phase 2, a total of 322 participants with a mean (SD) age of 49.3 (13.5) years completed the study. Among them, 71.1% were male, 48.1% were aboriginal, and 88.2% were single. The prevalence of oral cancerous lesions was 2.4%, which was higher than the recorded oral cancerous lesion prevalence in Canada (0.014%-1.42: 10,000) and Alberta (0.011%- 1.13:10,000). The clinical examinations indicated that 55 of the participants (17.1%) presented with potentially malignant oral lesions (PMOL), 176 (54.7%) of participants had oral lesion/inflammatory changes of oral mucosa, and 61.5% had high level of Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores. Risk of cancerous/PMOL was 1.68 times higher in participants living in shelters vs. those living alone. Oral lesion/inflammatory changes of the oral mucosa showed a significant association with cancerous/PMOL (p<0.001) compared to those who did not have cancerous/PMOL. In phase 3, five main categories were identified from qualitative analysis of 34 initial medical consultation notes of oral cancer patients: patient appraisal interval, help-seeking interval, formal diagnosis interval, pre-treatment interval, and contributing factors. In addition to biological factors, health-related behaviours, sociodemographic and tumor characteristics, other risk factors that negatively contributed to early detection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers included factors related to patients, providers, and healthcare system. Conclusions: The project successfully gathered the information from numerous resources to provide a comprehensive overview of what we already knew and shed light on dark and previously unseen corners of our provincial OCC and OPC challenges. This study revealed that OCC and OPC patients in Alberta continue to be diagnosed in stage IV, with high mortality rates. The prevalence of oral PMOL in the Boyle McCauley Street, an underserved community in Edmonton, was higher than that of the general population. Our study supports the need for developing opportunistic oral cancer screening and oral health promotion strategies in deprived communities and at -risk patients. The main contributors to total patient delay identified in this research were patients’ general lack of awareness about early symptoms of oral cancer and high-risk anatomic areas, inaccurate clinical judgement of attending physicians and dentists, and lengthy access to care. A sustainable plan is needed for enhancing public awareness and implementation of a solid curriculum for the training of medical and dental students.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».