MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6903181798 · doi:10.7939/r3-8d9h-0c33

Exploring Women’s Experiences with Deciding to Use and Access Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

2023· dissertation· en· W6903181798 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReproductive Health and Contraception
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLong-acting reversible contraceptionUnintended pregnancyFamily planningInclusion (mineral)Service (business)Service delivery frameworkHealth careHealth servicesUniversal design

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Women spend nearly half their life able to become pregnant. Despite the growing number of contraceptive options available, women continue to select user-dependent options over the user-independent long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). This in part contributes to the current rate of unintended pregnancy and abortion. Increasing LARC use has been proposed as one way to reduce unintended pregnancies and calls have been made for increasing women’s access to LARC. The purpose of this thesis was to explore women’s experiences with deciding to use a LARC and accessing the method. This was explored through two research projects. The first project was a scoping review of the literature. This was completed to identify healthcare professional led LARC services with an evaluation of the services. A systematic search of four electronic databases was completed with 40 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The identified services included counselling about LARC and providing LARC methods. These services were offered by a range of healthcare provider disciplines including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and midwives. The services frequently increased LARC uptake by women and clients were satisfied with the services they received. This review suggests there are several service models that can have an impact on LARC use. However, it was noted that the perspectives of potential LARC users were not considered when designing the services, nor were women’s opinions on the services always evaluated. The second project in this thesis was a qualitative study that explored the lived experiences of women who have decided to use a LARC method and have accessed the method in Alberta, Canada. Qualitative Description and Community Based Participatory Research frameworks were followed. Participants were purposefully recruited from the Birth Control Centre, an Edmonton-based clinic. One-on-one virtual interviews were conducted, and the data were analyzed through Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Four themes were generated from the analysis: 1) Actively Seeking Information, 2) Weighing Perceived Benefits and Drawbacks of LARC, 3) Deciding for Yourself, and 4) The Variable Experience of Access. Themes 1 to 3 provide insight into women’s active role in the decision-making process. The fourth theme encompasses the five factors women described to affect their ability to access LARC: the availability and awareness of services, patient-healthcare provider connections, appointment availability and wait times, device availability, and LARC cost and coverage. This study highlights the active role women take when considering LARC methods and their desire to make decisions about LARC themselves. This study also identified accessing LARC as a highly individual experience. The findings from this thesis identified several factors that women perceived to affect access to LARC methods. Additionally, this thesis provides new insights into how women decide to use LARC methods. Further research is required to understand the experiences of women living in rural settings and the experiences of gender diverse individuals. This thesis highlights the opportunities for healthcare providers to engage with women considering LARC and improve women’s ability to access LARC.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,080

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,034
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,007
Communication savante0,0060,007
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetReproductive Health and ContraceptionTravaux en français237 207