Risk and Protective Factors Among an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Youth Offenders in Calgary
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Risk and protective factors were divided into five distinct domains: individual, family, peer, school, and community. Analyses of factors within these domains yielded a number of significant findings. Individual Factors Domain • A large majority of youth in all groups were male; there were no significant gender differences between groups. • Though there were no significant differences between groups with regard to employment status, youth in the 1st or 2nd generation immigrant group were the least likely to be employed at the time they were interviewed (30.8%). • With regard to drug and alcohol related behaviour, a majority of youth in all groups had experience with drugs and alcohol; however, Caucasian 1st or 2nd generation immigrant, Canadian born, and Native/Métis youth were significantly more likely to have substance abuse issues than 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth from other ethnic backgrounds (76.9%-78.5% vs. 23.1%). • Analyses of property-related delinquent behaviours revealed that the only factor that demonstrated significant differences between groups was having broken into a house; Native/Métis youth were the most likely to have engaged in this behaviour (86.7%) compared to 30.8% of 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth from other ethnic backgrounds, who were the least likely. • Analyses of mental health characteristics revealed a number of factors where there were significant differences between groups. The 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth from other ethnic backgrounds were the least likely to have received a psychological assessment (9.1%) compared to 76.9% of Native/Métis youth. All Caucasian 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth had received counselling, compared to just over half (54.5%) of 1st or 2nd generation youth from other backgrounds. Native/Métis youth were the most likely to have a diagnosis of mental health problems (71.4%) compared to only 7.7% of 1st of 2nd generation, other ethnic background youth. Diagnoses of depression, ADHD/ADD, and FASD demonstrated significant differences between groups. Half of the Caucasian 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth were diagnosed with depression, compared to only 7.7% of Native/Métis and 1st or 2nd generation ix immigrant, other ethnic background youth. Caucasian 1st or 2nd generation immigrant youth were most likely to have a diagnosis of ADHD/ADD (58.3%), compared to only 7.7% of 1st or 2nd generation, other ethnic background youth, and also had the highest proportion of FASD diagnoses – 25%, compared to 2% of Canadian born youth, 7.7% of Native/Métis, and 0% of 1st or 2nd generation, other ethnic background youth.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».