MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6903740676 · doi:10.13127/misc/23

MED-SUV 1th YEAR MEETING - NICOLOSI (CATANIA) 7 | 9 JULY 2014

2014· article· en· W6903740676 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
Thématiqueearthquake and tectonic studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVolcanoDeclarationWork (physics)Natural disasterNatural (archaeology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The MED-SUV project is a response to the European Community call “ENV.2012.6.4-2 - Long-term monitoring experiments in geologically active regions of Europe prone to natural hazards: the Supersite concept - FP7-ENV-2012-two-stage – of 20 July 2011. Among the requests, the call stated that the accepted projects had to contribute to the Geohazards Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL) initiative. The GSNL is an ambitious initiative, which is based on the “Frascati declaration” stated at the conclusion of the “3rd International Geohazards Workshop” of GEO held in ESA-ESRIN in November 2007. The declaration recommended “…to stimulate an international and intergovernmental effort to monitor and study selected reference sites by establishing open access to relevant datasets according to GEO principles to foster the collaboration between all various partners and endusers…”. After a first period based on a volunteer approach, during which seven initial Supersites were identified, including Mt. Etna and Campi Flegrei/Vesuvius, the Supersites initiative was developed in the framework of the GEO-GEOSS Work Plan. The MED-SUV project aims to apply the Supersite concept to Mt. Etna and Campi Flegreii/Vesuvius, recently recognized as Permanent Supersites by the Scientific Advisory Committee of GSNL and the Supersites Coordination Team of the Committee on Earth Observing Satellites. These two active volcanic areas represent end-members of volcanic systems, Mt. Etna being an open-conduit volcano and Vesuvius and Campi Flegreii closed-conduit systems. Given their differences, and that the two volcanic areas lie in densely populated areas, these two Supersite volcanoes pose diverse volcanic hazards at local, regional, and continental scales. In order to improve understanding of the volcanic processes of Mt. Etna and Campi Flegrei/Vesuvius, and thus improve hazard assessment, the MED-SUV project will use the large sets of data available for both sites. Integration of both ground and EO data, collected over long time periods, will enable the volcanology community to answer key questions relating to prediction of the occurrence, location, duration, and magnitude of eruptive events. Additional achievements will include (1) optimization of the link between observations and end-users during eruptive events, and (2) evaluation of the project outcomes to assess whether they provide enforceable prototypes for the next generation of fully integrated volcano-monitoringand research systems, and whether they are applicable to other volcanic areas. Last but not least, a crucial mandate emerging from the Supersites rationale is the need to guarantee the sharing of data and scientific products for the promotion of unselfish scientific collaboration. The MED-SUV consortium comprises 24 partners from 9 countries, including two from outside Europe (the USA and Canada). The consortium includes both scientific and industrial partners as well as public agencies with long experience covering all volcanic risk management practice from making observations to public communication. To accomplish the objectives, the MED-SUV Project is structured in six Work Packages for research and technology implementation (WP2-7), and two Work Packages devoted to project management (WP1) and information dissemination (WP8). WP2 and WP3 implement the next generation of observing systems. Their activity embraces the development of new systems (WP2) and full exploitation of existing ones (WP3). This includes the design and development of an e-infrastructure for sharing data and products. WP4 and WP5 focus on characterization and modelling of volcanic processes at the two Supersites. Hazard assessment and fostering relationships between scientists and end users are the aims of WP6. WP7 will test the main outcomes of the other WPs, and implement a pilot phase at the two supersites and in two selected test cases– Piton de la Fournaise and the Azores. The MED-SUV project started in June 2013. One year later, the kick-off meeting was held in Naples. We now convene again to present and discuss our ongoing activities and first outcomes, to revisit our future plans, and to strengthen the cooperation between participants. The 1st Year Meeting is hosted in Nicolosi village, a popular place in the European volcanology community because of its history as the base for many teams working at Mt. Etna. It is considered to be the “door” to Mt. Etna. Nicolosi was the birthplace of the brothers Carlo and Mario Gemmellaro, who were born in the 18th century. They began the modern volcanology studies of Mt. Etna that we continue, in the MED-SUV project, at the present day.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,232
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,776

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2320,132

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)→Même sujetearthquake and tectonic studies→Travaux en français237 207→