MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6904927259 · doi:10.14288/1.0444927

Understanding the Landscape of Student Food Insecurity at the UBC Vancouver Campus and Identifying Opportunities to Meet Student Needs

2024· article· en· W6904927259 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFood insecurityFood securitySustainabilityWork (physics)Food systemsFood safetyHigher education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The University of British Columbia is located in Vancouver, Canada--a city that is regarded as one of the top 5 most liveable cities in the world (Carey, 2023). However, the city's world-renowned educational institution, The University of British Columbia (UBC) is plagued by a food-insecurity crisis, with its students struggling to meet their food needs at a rate more than twice the National average. The issue of Food Insecurity is not just a UBC specific problem, but a National one, as many other leading Canadian institutions of higher education have reported the same degree of food insecurity; some as high as 46%. Over the last several years, UBC has increasingly placed more resources towards addressing the chronic issue of food insecurity, and this work is the latest in a long line of efforts to solve the student food insecurity crisis on the university’s campus. This Community Based Action Research (CBAR) was conducted alongside the UBC Food Hub, Alma Mater Society (AMS) Food Bank, and UBC’s SEEDS Sustainability Research Program in an effort to better understand the food landscape at UBC. Following a mixed-methods approach, we engaged multiple Stakeholders within UBC’s Food System through eight interviews with four different Food Security Resources (FSRs) and 299 surveys to assess students' food security status, engagement, and awareness of various FSRs at UBC’s Point Grey Campus. Following the Canadian Household Food Security Module for assessing food insecurity we discovered an alarmingly high rate of food insecurity among 229 student survey responses (76.9%), 64% of which were determined to be moderately food insecure. What made this finding so alarming was the randomness of our sampling as we had professors send out mass email blasts, approached random people at the bus stop, and passed out dozens of surveys at the Storm the Wall event. Another significant discovery in our research was that students were largely finding out about resources from their friends, even UBC Financial Aid was primarily discovered by students from conversations with other students, as opposed to UBC communication channels. UBC’s most targeted communication channel for connecting students with Food Security Resources, a digital resource known as the UBC Food Hub was among the least cited resources for discovering Food Security Resources at the campus. The lack of awareness to resources is problematic as our research has found that many severely food insecure students (both domestic and international) are going through their degree without the support of any financial aid / using institutional resources such as the AMS Food Bank / Food Hub Market (UBC’s Most Affordable Grocery Store). In our Interviews, our primary finding was that the student leaders of FSRs have a genuine desire to do more than what they are currently doing to support their fellow students. They want a ‘seat at the table’ where valuable discussions around student food security status are taking place. In particular, they long to increase the amount of support their initiatives are offering, and to see UBC become a food secure campus. This research project has reported the highest rate of food insecurity ever at UBC’s Campus, discovered that institutional communication channels are not reaching students, and found that many students are going through their degree hungry and lacking considerable support to alleviate their burden. Thankfully, grassroots initiatives are making a difference to the students using them, and are ready and willing to be a part of more substantial change. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,620
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,764

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,007
Communication savante0,0110,002
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,201
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,149 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→Travaux en français237 207→