Mastering the Narrative: The Role of Conformity and Deviance in Racialized Students’ University Experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Entering university marks a life transition that is significant for the development of one’s identity, personality, and well-being (Azmitia et al., 2013; Chung et al., 2014), and often coincides with emerging adulthood. During this period, young people are engaged in the process of constructing a narrative identity, using their autobiographical past and imagined future to formulate an internalised story of the self and to make sense of their lives. The content and structure of such narratives make up an important component of personality and are important predictors of one’s well-being (McAdams, 2011; McAdams et al., 2010). Racialized students may anticipate unique experiences with social structures (e.g., institutions and social services) that organise and assign value to social categories such as race and ethnicity (Cortina et al., 2012), and that also shape their transition to university (Emerson et al., 2014; Syed & McLean, 2023). The influence of social structures is particularly evident when looking at people’s narratives, as these stories are constructed within the bounds of societal expectations (McAdams, 2010). Specifically, people’s narratives will often draw upon master narratives, culturally shared stories that reflect the power structures of a society (Syed & McLean, 2023). Not adhering to a master narrative can be associated with poor psychosocial development and well-being as one’s story is more likely to be unheard or rejected. Racialized people, due to their unique relationship with social structures, may be more likely to engage with alternative narratives, which function as a form of resistance to push back against the dominant forces of the master narrative (McLean & Syed, 2016; Patterson et al., 2022). Currently, knowledge that could support the success of racialized university students is lacking because personality development research has neglected the specific experiences of racialized people (Arshad & Chung, 2022), especially within a Canadian context (Williams et al., 2022). This study will use a novel, longitudinal mixed-methods approach that combines narrative and questionnaire data to describe whether there is a master narrative of the transition to university and, if so, how it is associated with racialized students’ personal experiences during the transition to university. Namely, we are interested in 1) the content of the master narrative and what that tells us about how people experience social structures within university, 2) who is more likely to conform to normative expectations over time, and who is likely to deviate from and develop alternative narratives over time, and 3) the relation between one’s negotiation with master and alternative narrative and well-being. Participants will be drawn from a recently launched longitudinal study, Giving Voice, examining personality and well-being development in racialized young adults throughout university, with data collection beginning in August 2024 (they began their studies at the University of Toronto Mississauga in September 2024). This research will be the first to examine narratives of the transition to university through a lens of power, privilege, and oppression in a sample of racialized Canadian emerging adults. This will offer unique insights into how racialized people experience important life transitions, whether their experience differs from what is considered normal in society, and any important impacts on personality development and well-being.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».