MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6906480076 · doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2025.03.009

Effects of Planting Time of Sugarcane on Borers Damage and Control Benefits

2025· article· en· W6906480076 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Établissements canadiensMinistry of Agriculture
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSowingYield (engineering)Growing seasonForensic sciencePest controlPesticideSaccharum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

【Objective】The borers damage and chemical control effectiveness of sugarcane planted at different time were analyzed in this study, providing a base for choosing the suitable planting time of sugarcane and for the scientific utilization of pesticide against stem borers, in order to supply technical support for ensuring high and stable yield in sugarcane industry.【Method】In 2018/2019 crushing season, new sugarcane was planted in late December of 2017, in late January, late February, late March and late April of 2018, respectively. The growth of sugarcane and damage caused by borers were investigated. The benefits from controlling and non-controlling borers were compared. Investigations in this study on new-planting sugarcane were conducted for two consecutive crushing seasons to compare the data obtained under different climatic conditions. The planting and survey methods of new-planting sugarcane in 2019/2020 crushing season were consistent with that in 2018/2019 crushing season.【Result】The results show that the dead heart rates caused by the first and second generations of borers in new planting sugarcane tend to decrease with the delayed planting times in the condition without using insecticide. The average dead heart rate caused by the second generation of borers in sugarcane planted in December was as high as 24.90%, while the average dead heart rate in those sugarcane planted in April was low at 8.37%. Different planting times had little affect on the damaged plant rates and damaged internode rates caused by borers at harvest. The dead heart rates of sugarcane seedlings planted in March and April caused by borers were relatively low. The plant height, yield, and sugar content per hectare of sugarcane planted early (in the late December, late January and late February) were higher than those planted later (in the late March and late April), and the early planted sugarcane also showed better economic benefits significantly. Under non-chemical conditions, the average yield and sugar content per hectare of sugarcane planted in December were 102.19 t/hm2 and 15.57 t/ hm2, respectively, while those planted in April were only 47.57 t/hm2 and 6.40 t/hm2, respectively. The total income of cane yield and sugar yield obtained from sugarcane planted in December, January and February increased more than 220% compared to those planted in April. The application of pesticides for controlling borers contributed to the increase in sugarcane yield and sugar content, with a benefit ratio of 1:1.37-1.99 for sugarcane farmers and a total benefit ratio of 1:4.33-5.76 for sugarcane industry. It indicates that control of borers has great importance to the high-quality development of sugar industry.【Conclusion】To improve the supply capacity of raw sugarcane in China, it is suggested that sugarcane be planted from the late December to the late February of the following year in cane regions of Guangxi Province. Combining with borers control, the yield of sugarcane and sugar content can be further increased.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,549
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,462
Écart entre enseignants0,355 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle