Air temperature data for the Labrador coast during the late 18th century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The meteorological data for the Labrador coast in the late 18th century (1771–87). The oldest meteorological data for the area of the northeastern coast of the Labrador Peninsula come from the second half of the 18th century. Weather observations were carried out by members of the Moravian Church, who settled there in 1771 and founded the first Christian mission in a settlement called Nain. Within a few years, two more settlements were established: Okak (formerly known as Okkak) and Hopedale (formerly Hoffenthal). The data were taken from the meteorological registers available at three major archives: the Moravian Archives in Herrnhut (Germany), the Moravian Archives at Muswell Hill and the Archives of the Royal Society, both located in London (United Kingdom). Based on the available materials, three air temperature data series were developed, one for each station. Meteorological observations were carried out at Nain for the period Oct 1 1771 – 31 Jul 1786. During this time, there was one gap in measurements from 20 Oct 1774 to 16 Sep 1775 and from 12 to 30 Sep 1784. At Okak, observations were made from 16 Oct 1776 to 31 Aug 1786 without interruption. At Hopedale, observations were conducted between 1 Oct 1782 and 16 Aug 1786. This series is less complete because it has irregular gaps in observations: short gaps ranging from single observations in a day to a complete lack of observations for three days; and one long gap from 01 Aug 1784 to 31 Aug 1785.All available historical data have been quality-controlled and corrected. The air temperature was converted to degrees Celsius.During the study period, the Moravian missionaries made measurements in Nain at 08:00 and 14:00, but there were days with three, four or five measurements daily. Okak and Hopedale implemented a standardised measurement schedule, with readings consistently taken at 08:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00.Mean daily air temperatures (MDAT) for the historical periods were calculated using nine different formulas ([2]–[10]) listed below. Using contemporary data from Nain and Hopedale from the period 1991–2000, we calculated MDAT also for all the formulas below (including formula [1]). Formula (1) uses 24 hourly observations per day, which allows us to calculate “real” MDAT. To identify biases in calculating MDATs using formulas (2)–(10), the differences between them and MDAT1 (formula [1]) were calculated separately for each month (see Table 2 in Singh et al. 2024). In this way, calculated corrections were added to historical MDAT2–MDAT10 values to obtain corrected values of MDAT for this period. For Okak (no instrumental data available at present), the corrections were taken from Nain. MDAT1= (T1+T2+T3+ … T24)/24 (1) MDAT2= (T8+T14)/2 (2) MDAT3 = (T8+T14+T21)/3 (3) MDAT4 = (T3+T8+T14+T16)/4 (4) MDAT5= (T4+T8+T12+T14+T16)/5 (5) MDAT6 = (T6+T8+T12+T14+T16)/5 (6) MDAT7 = (T6+T8+T12+T16+T20)/5 (7) MDAT8= (T7+T12+T16+T20)/4 (8) MDAT9= (T8+T12+T16+T20)/4 (9) MDAT10 = (T8+T12+T14+T16)/4 (10)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».