Targeting Determinants of Diabetes: A Move Toward An Applied Democracy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The growing epidemic in Type II diabetes has disproportionately affected marginalized populations in the United States and has caused an uncontrollable and unsustainable increase in the cost of treating and managing diabetes. To date, there are no effective widespread treatments or interventions to reverse these trends. The answers, however, must be sought outside the traditional biomedical perspective not only to incorporate the political, social, historical, and economic disease determinants, but also to actually put them into practice. Over the past two decades institutions, organizations, and individuals are recognizing that concepts of health and disease have broader implications than we once thought. In 1986 the Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion identified nine conditions and resources that constitute health: peace, shelter, education, food, income, a stable ecosystem, sustainable resources, social justice, and equity. This definition acknowledges the diverse and multiple factors that contribute to the incidence and prevalence of disease in people. Determinants of disease have political, social, cultural, environmental, genetic, economic, historical, and individual origins. Health professionals seek long-term solutions to epidemics, like diabetes, by identifying and intervening in disease determinants in various populations. However, previous and current medical and public health interventions are patient-centered and fall short of addressing the multiple determinants acknowledged by the WHO in 1986. Given the current rising costs of health care and fiscal crises, U.S. policymakers and the health care industry are faced with placing limits on health care resources. Terms like cost-effectiveness, equity, and quality of care are factoring into how health care is delivered. This signifies a change from the biomedical patient-focused distribution of care to one concerning social justice and equity. A study performed in 1999 by Jeffery and French showed that intervention efforts targeting lifestyle changes and behavior modification were not sustainable over a three year time period. Additionally, Williamson has stated that community-based educational efforts are ineffective because behaviors are much more complex than researchers assume. By expanding the determinants of diabetes to reflect a more broadened definition of health, medical professionals can better understand the actual causes of disease in populations and, consequently, implement more effective interventions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».