Report of the Working Group on Fishery Statistics Liaison (WGSTAL)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The WGSTAL meeting was held back‐to‐back to the Eurostat Working Group meet‐ing on Fishery statistics 28–29 April 2008. The Eurostat meeting included a number of agenda points that also are relevant to ICES and this report should be consulted. Par‐ticipation in the WGSTAL and the REuirostat meeting is the same. ICES has conducted this review over the last three years with David Cross (former Eurostat) as consultant. David Cross presented the results. The background for the project is the need for long time‐series useful for discussing general changes in biodi‐versity and distribution of species. E.g. fisheries data have proven very useful in dis‐cussions related to effects of climate change. The review is based on data published in Bulletin Statistique (ICES), original submis‐sions and consideration of having consistent time‐series. In particular, there had been submissions after the annual publication of Bull. Stat. and these submissions are in‐cluded in the revised dataseries. The review is now concluded, it was possible to cor‐rect a number of problems for the period 1950–2005 whereas data before that time are sparse and also collected less systematically. It was therefore decided that data for the first half of the century up to 1949 (incl.) would not be scrutinised and potentially amended but would be converted to electronic form assuring that the transfer is accu‐rate. The project has benefited from earlier work done by Reg Watson (Univ. BC, Canada) and David Cross was grateful that these database had been made available to ICES. David Cross noted that the results from a previous project on discrepancies between databases held by NAFO, ICES/Eurostat, ICCAT, and FAO had been very helpful. There are still discrepancies between the revised ICES/Eurostat data and the totals for FAO area 27 that are held by FAO. Some of these discrepancies are as a consequence of area redefinitions after the publication of the data. ICES has revised its data cor‐recting for such redefinitions. The area redefinitions concerned the Northwest Atlan‐tic (which for the earliest part of the series was included in the ICES data) and certain areas in what is to‐day the CECAF area. These discrepancies will be discussed with FAO at a later stage. The status of the project is that revision of the dataseries is completed; data from the period 1950–2005 have been revised as appropriate, the national correspondents have been asked to consider the first part of the dataseries (1950–1972) and that the second part of the time‐series will be mailed to the national statistical correspondents before summer for their comments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,038 | 0,052 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,066 | 0,059 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».