MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6907291636 · doi:10.20381/ruor-31296

Automated Detection of Substance Use Through Social Mining and its Prediction Ability in the Canadian Population

2025· dissertation· en· W6907291636 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMental Health via Writing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubstance usePsychological interventionSocial mediaPopulationSubstance abuseConsumption (sociology)Process (computing)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

According to the latest WHO report in 2024, there is a significant increase in substance use disorders and environmental harms around the world. The report highlights that alcohol consumption was responsible for 2.6 million deaths annually, representing 4.7% of all world deaths, while psychoactive drug use accounted for 0.6 million deaths. The number of drug users increased to 292 million in 2022, reflecting a 20% rise over 10 years. Automated detection of different substance uses through social media can be an effective and practical observational tool for the global substance use problem. Automated detection of online communication has multiple applications, including helping people at-risk and protecting them by predicting and monitoring the early signs of risks on time. Our system can be used by individuals with authority (such as parents or doctors) to detect and monitor different substance users. It could raise an alarm to the relevant individuals to take necessary interventions for the early signs of substance use associated with the flagged posts. This thesis describes the process for classifying online posts to detect substance use problems as early as possible. We began by utilizing two datasets of annotated social media posts to train several classification models that predict whether these posts indicate signs of substance use. We assessed the performance of several traditional and recent deep learning models. Different CNN-based, RNN-based, BERT-based, and GPT models were found to be promising approaches in detecting substance users from their posts. GPT-4o, using a few-shot learning model, outperformed other models with 89.44% F1-score. Also, we built different user-level detection models for common substances (cannabis and alcohol). For cannabis user detection, GPT-4o using a few-shot learning model was the best-performing model with 85.22% F1-score, while the DeBERTa-v3 model was the best-performing model with 65.50% F1-score for alcohol user detection. As a second objective, these models were used for the automated detection of different substance use at the population level in Canada. A common practice for substance use detection at the population level involves conducting surveys via phone calls or interviews; however, this approach is both time-consuming and expensive. Understanding Canadian trends in alcohol and drug use is crucial for developing and evaluating effective policies and programs at both the national and provincial levels. Examining social media posts can serve as a flexible alternative for identifying several substance use problems across Canada. We detected the population-level use of cannabis and alcohol from 2015 to 2018, based on representative samples. Then, we compared these results of the same years' official statistics from Health Canada for the two substances. We used the estimated reports from Health Canada until 2019. Given the lack of annotated data for several substances, such as alcohol, we proposed a data augmentation technique that increased the information within the training phase by building several artificial training sets. Then, we applied the best generalized model (as mentioned before) for population-level detection. The results for population-level detection for both cannabis and alcohol were promising for the tested years and comparable with the results of the Health Canada surveys. The cannabis user detection achieved a difference of 5% or less from the governmental estimations for the nine Canadian provinces included in this study. Similarly, the alcohol user detection achieved a difference of 6.5% or less for the same group of provinces under study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to propose the detection of substance use through social media for an entire country.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,480
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,831

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Ottawa - LibraryMême sujetMental Health via WritingTravaux en français237 207