MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6907388840 · doi:10.21227/xbvs-0198

Online Learning Global Queries Dataset: A Comprehensive Dataset of What People from Different Countries ask Google about Online Learning

2021· dataset· en· W6907388840 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIEEE DataPort · 2021
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThe InternetOnline learningBig dataAsk priceEmerging marketsWork (physics)Online searchEmerging technologies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Any work using this dataset should cite the following paper:Nirmalya Thakur, Isabella Hall, and Chia Y. Han, “Investigating the Emergence of Online Learning in Different Countries using the 5 W’s and 1 H Approach”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies: Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications (IHIET-AI 2022), Lausanne, Switzerland, April 21-23, 2022AbstractThe rise of the Internet of Everything lifestyle in the last decade has had a significant impact on the increased emergence and adoption of online learning and education in almost all countries across the world. The COVID-19 pandemic, causing the academic, non-academic, government, and corporate sectors to switch to e-learning, has acted as a catalyst towards the growth of the online learning and education sector, which is increasing at a rate as never seen before and is expected to hit USD 1 trillion by 2027. As E-learning 3.0 proceeds towards becoming the norm in different regions on a global scale, users of different forms of online learning technologies such as educators, students, and educational institutions have started spending time, more than ever before, on the internet to familiarize themselves with the different emerging online learning-based technologies. This is resulting in the generation of enormous amounts of Big Data centered around online learning in all the search engines used across the world. This has been specifically predominant on Google as Google is the most popular search engine in almost all geographic regions on a global scale. Mining, studying, interpreting, and analyzing such web behavior data from Google, especially the specific queries, originating from different geographic regions, holds the potential for performing a wide range of research tasks related to investigating the emergence of online learning in different countries. These research tasks could include user research, user behavior analysis, topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and aspect-based sentiment analysis, just to name a few.To address this challenge, this work presents a comprehensive dataset of all the queries related to online learning that was searched on Google by individuals from different countries of the world. As adoption of E-learning 3.0 is a crucial aspect of the economic growth and development of a country, therefore, this dataset presents the web behavior data – in the form of Google search queries related to online learning that originated from all the 38 member states of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). These member states include - Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.Data DescriptionThe dataset consists of one MS Excel workbook named – “Online_Learning_Global_Queries.xlsx”. This workbook has 38 MS Excel sheets, with each sheet named after the specific country (a member state of OECD) whose data it represents. The data was collected on November 1, 2021. Each MS Excel Sheet in this workbook has the following attributes:· Modifier Type: It lists the type of query. The categories include questions, propositions, comparisons, etc.· Modifier: It lists the specific modifiers used to communicate the query to Google. The categories include the popular 5 W’s and 1 H: Who, What, When Where, Why, and How, as well as other modifiers.· Suggestion: It lists the specific query that consists of the specific modifier and represents the associated modifier type.· Language: It represents the language of the query. The most common value is “en” which stands for English.· Region: It represents the 2-letter country code in ALPHA-2 format (ISO 3166).· Keyword: It represents the online query that is being analyzed. The query for all the countries is “online learning”.Details on the methodology and procedure that were followed for the development of this dataset are included in the above-mentioned paper. For any questions related to this dataset or the paper, please contact Nirmalya Thakur at thakurna@mail.uc.edu

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0040,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIEEE DataPortTravaux en français237 207