MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6907444314 · doi:10.24384/10.24384/000122

Professor Cecil Gray CBE KCSG FRCS FRCP FRCA in interview with Dr Max Blythe: Interview 2

2017· other· en· W6907444314 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueRadar (Oxford Brookes University) · 2017
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedical History and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGray (unit)CurareMuscle relaxationOfficerWifeSenior house officer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Following the first interview in which Professor T Cecil Gray discusses the start of a career as an anaesthetist, this interview takes up the account of his career from 1944 after being invalided home from North Africa, where he served in the Royal Army Medical Corps. Professor Gray begins by speaking of resuming work as an anaesthetist in Liverpool and the start of his pioneering work on curare in anaesthetic practice, in collaboration with the anaesthetist, John Halton.In the mid-forties, John Halton divided his time between service as a medical officer in the Royal Air Force and working with the distinguished thoracic surgeon, Hugh Morriston Davies, at Clatterbridge Hospital. John Halton learnt from American Air Force colleagues of the first use of curare as a muscle relaxant in anaesthesia (by Harold Griffith in Montreal in 1942), and managed to obtain curare in the form of a crude extract of the vine, Chondodendron tomentosum - a constituent of the South American arrow poison. Professor Gray and John Halton began to experiment with the extract in their respective anaesthetic practices and when supplies ran low started to use the pure alkaloid, Curarin (d-tubocurarine chloride), which they obtained from Rod Gregory. Rod Gregory, who was a senior lecturer and then professor in the physiology department of the University of Liverpool, was to remain an important research collaborator.Professor Gray then goes on to describe the dramatic muscle relaxation effect produced when he first administered Curarin intravenously to a patient undergoing abdominal surgery, using Pentothal and cyclopropane as the anaesthetic. There is discussion of how initially Curarin was given in a low dose so that respiration was not abolished completely, but with experience the dose was gradually increased and respiration was controlled. This technique permitted the use of light anaesthesia for surgery and greatly assisted post-operative recovery. The discussion then progresses to the development of the technique with the use of physostigmine and then prostigmine in conjunction with atropine to reverse the effect of the Curarin.In March 1946 the Liverpool group's early results were presented at a meeting of the Royal Society of Medicine and were published subsequently in the Proceedings of the Society, in what is now recognised as a landmark paper in anaesthesia literature. (General acceptance by anaesthetists of the use of controlled ventilation with muscle relaxants did not come until later, and at first tubocurarine was used almost exclusively as an adjuvant to anaesthesia in the spontaneously respiring patient.) Professor Gray talks of the award of an MD degree in 1947 and his appointment as reader to head a new academic department of anaesthesia at the University of Liverpool, and he acknowledges the support of the professor of surgery, Charles Wells. He then speaks of the appointment to a demonstratorship of Dr Gordon Jackson Rees, who became a highly valued colleague and friend over many years, contributing to both the teaching and research of the department. In the following part of the interview, Professor Gray discusses setting up an administrative structure for anaesthetists in Liverpool and the origins of the renowned Liverpool course in anaesthetics. A discussion follows of a joint publication with Dr Gordon Jackson Rees on the role of apnoea in major surgery, and the essence of the 'Liverpool Technique' being the application of the anaesthetic triad, unconsciousness, analgesia and muscle relaxation.The interview moves on to Professor Gray's involvement with teaching initiatives in Europe, including the WHO course at the Anaesthesiology Centre in Copenhagen. The final part of the interview covers Dr Gordon Jackson Rees' entry into the field of paediatric anaesthesia, the impact of the introduction of the National Health Service, and Professor Gray's invitation in 1948 to join the board of the newly created Faculty of Anaesthetists of the Royal College of Surgeons.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,211
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,175 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRadar (Oxford Brookes University)Même sujetMedical History and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207