Applying Flipped Learning Concepts to Simulation and Its Impact on the Retention of Non-technical Skills
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background To Err is human, building a safer health care system has put the emphasis on the importance of teamwork practice through simulation based medical education (SBME) to prevent patient mortality. Flipped learning has emerged as an effective add-on to simulation for the acquisition of technical skills (TS). However, data on the combination of flipped learning and SBME for the acquisition of non-technical skills, such as crisis resource management (CRM), is lacking. Purpose The primary objective of our study was to assess if providing flipped learning regarding the TS required for the taskwork of an upcoming simulation would increase CRM skills retention three months after the study intervention. Secondary objectives concerned the interventions’ effect on anxiety levels, cognitive load, achievement emotions and participants’ perceptions towards the activity. Methods A randomized between-group experiment using a convergent mixed method approach was employed. The study intervention consisted in the provision of beforehand teaching on the different illnesses encountered in an upcoming acute care simulation training session. The primary outcome was the between group difference in overall scores on the Ottawa CRM Global Rating Scale. Main and secondary quantitative outcomes were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA. A qualitative analysis was conducted on the verbatim of semi-structured interviews. Secondary qualitative outcomes were assessed both deductively through a content analysis and inductively with a thematic analysis. Results Sixty-four participants underwent randomization. There was a between subject difference favouring flipped learning. No differences in salivary cortisol, heart rate, state trait anxiety inventory or achievement emotions were noted between groups. The qualitative analysis revealed a high variability in the intervention’s impact on participants, with some experiencing performance pressure. A strong intuition towards perceiving judgement was associated with simulation training. Learners’ achievement goal orientation may have modulated their reaction to the study intervention. Discussion Our findings are in line with previous work on the topic of flipped learning and SBME. However, our trial provides insight on potential negative effects it may have on learners. Educators should utilize this instructional design with caution until further research may clarify which learner subtype may benefit or not from this combination.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».