MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6907922438 · doi:10.25439/rmt.27579900

Using earth observation satellites to explore forest dynamics across large areas

2019· dissertation· en· W6907922438 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2019
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTaigaEarth observationDisturbance (geology)SatelliteSatellite imageryTime seriesEarth observation satelliteGlobal changeNoise (video)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A third of the land on earth is covered by forests. Forests provide valuable resources and essential ecosystem services, including filtering air and water, harbouring biodiversity and managing the carbon cycle. Regular monitoring and reporting across various indicators is necessary to manage forests sustainably. Due to the vastness of forests, satellite Earth observation is one of the most practical and cost-effective ways to monitor forests. The regular and consistent measurements provided from space enable time series analysis, which can reveal trends over time. The temporal, spatial and radiometric depth of the Landsat archive, which extends back to 1972 in some cases, is one of the most useful resources for monitoring forest dynamics across large areas. Analysing forest disturbance and recovery trends using Landsat has recently become widespread, particularly since the opening of the image archive in 2008. However, deriving useful information from the data is challenging on many fronts, including overcoming cloud-cover, differentiating true changes from noise and relating spectral measurements to meaningful outputs. In addition, large data volumes create hurdles for processing and storage. This study presents new techniques for exploiting the Landsat archive in relation to monitoring and measuring forest disturbance and recovery across large areas. Landsat data were processed through a series of steps, analysed in time series, and combined with other data sources to produce mapped outputs and statistical summaries, which can be interpreted by non-experts. The spatial extent of the analysis expands across multiple scales - from local and regional to global (temperate and boreal forests). Firstly, eight Landsat spectral indices were assessed to determine their sensitivity to forest disturbance (caused by wildfire) and recovery in southeast Australian forests. Results indicated that indices making use of the shortwave infrared wavelengths were more reliable indicators of forest disturbance and recovery than indices using only the red and near-infrared wavelengths. Following this exploratory analysis, three indices and two change detection algorithms were evaluated in terms of their ability to detect forest disturbance. Results showed that the LandTrendr algorithm with the Normalised Burn Ratio (NBR) was the most accurate single algorithm/index combination (overall error 21%). However, results were greatly improved by using an ensemble approach. A Random Forests model combining several Landsat-derived metrics with multiple indices, trained with human interpreted reference data, had an overall error of 7%. A notable finding was that priming the training data with confusing cases (commission errors from the change detection algorithms) led to increased accuracy. One Random Forests model was used to create annual forest disturbance maps (1989-2017) across the state of Victoria, Australia. These maps, in conjunction with each pixel's temporal trajectory, were used to extract metrics for spectral disturbance magnitude and recovery length across 2 million ha of burned forest in southeast Australia. The association between disturbance magnitude and forest recovery length, as measured spectrally, was then explored. A novel patch-based technique was used to isolate the disturbance-recovery relationship from confounding factors such as climate, elevation and soil type. The results showed statistically significant differences across bioregions and forest types. The patch-based method demonstrated how Landsat time series can be harnessed to explore ecological changes. The methods developed above were then employed over a much larger area, to investigate trends in fire disturbance and forest recovery in temperate and boreal forests worldwide. This work used both MODIS and Landsat data, through the Google Earth Engine platform, to look at trends in burned area, fire severity and forest recovery across almost 2 billion ha of forests, over the last 18 years. Burned area results showed significant increasing trends in two cases: coniferous forests in Canada and Mediterranean forests in Chile. A significant decreasing trend was found in temperate mixed forests in China. An assessment of fire severity, as measured by Landsat spectral change, highlighted possible trends in a few cases; most notably, the Russian taiga, where increasing severity was observed. An analysis of forest recovery, based on Landsat time series, indicated recovery times were accelerating in many regions. However, given the relatively short time-period analysed, these results should be interpreted with caution. The results presented in this thesis demonstrate the power of Earth observation satellites in monitoring forests at the landscape scale. Although forests are complex systems that are influenced by a myriad of factors, the regular and consistent measurements provided by satellites can be analysed in time series to provide inter-comparable results across large areas. This can broaden our understanding of the dynamic nature of forests, and in doing so, help progress towards their sustainable management.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Même sujetRemote Sensing in Agriculture→Travaux en français237 207→