MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6907971429 · doi:10.25446/oxford.24073533

The Sphakia Survey: A Brief Introduction

2024· other· en· W6907971429 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Oxford · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDozenPrehistoryChristian ministryTurkishWork (physics)Period (music)White (mutation)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

WhereSphakia is a deme (former eparchy), a modern administrative district in SW Crete (Greece with an area of 466.2 km. sq. It includes most of the White Mountains, and a dozen gorges, running S to the Libyan Sea – the best known is the Samaria Gorge – and very little arable land.WhyThe Sphakia Survey is an archaeological project whose main objective is to investigate human interaction with the landscape.WhenWe have looked at evidence for human activity from the time that people first arrived in Sphakia at the end of the Stone Age (by ca 3300 B.C.) to the end of the Turkish period in Crete (A.D. 1898). In other words, we have been working with a time span of some 5000 years. We divided this long period into three epochs: Prehistoric (PH, 3300–1050 B.C.); Graeco-Roman (GR, 1050 B.C. – A.D. 650); Byzantine-Venetian-Turkish (BVT, A.D. 650–1898).The work of the Survey was done in several stages:reconnaissance in Sphakia: 1986field seasons in Sphakia: 1987–90, 92study seasons in the Khania Museum: 1989, 1993–8finds photography: 1999.WhoThe Sphakia Survey is directed by Lucia Nixon and Jennifer Moody, with additional senior participation by Simon Price and Oliver Rackham. Jane Francis has joined us as an additional co-editor of the final print publication.Many specialists and students have worked with us in Sphakia, in the Khania Museum, and in our home universities. We did our work with a permit granted by the Greek Ministry of Culture and Sciences, obtained through the Canadian Institute in Greece (formerly Canadian Archaeological Institute at Athens). The staff of the Greek Archaeological Service, Khania Office, has supported us throughout. People in Sphakia have given us crucial information about their area, as well as much practical help and encouragement.Our work has been funded by a number of agencies and foundation, principally the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; the Institute for Aegean Prehistory, Philadelphia; and the Craven Committee, University of Oxford.For full acknowledgements, please see the Project Team page.HowMembers of the Survey have collected and analysed environmental, archaeological, documentary, and local evidence. The archaeological material has been collected from the surface alone. For more information on this look at the <b>research methods</b> pages.WhatSphakia has provided us with an extraordinary opportunity for archaeological research: it covers a large area, which had never been investigated systematically, with a broad environmental and altitudinal range. Our generous permit has allowed us to survey and collect surface finds in all parts of Sphakia. The number of sites known before (about 20, plus villages and neighbourhoods) and after our work (over 300, including neighbourhoods) gives a crude index of how much we have been able to learn about Sphakia. We divided Sphakia into eight regions, from west to east. Each site has a number (region number plus site number, e.g. 4.21). The size of Sphakia gives the project a truly regional scope (see map above), and has made it possible to test our ideas by contrasting different parts of Sphakia, e.g. different uses of the three main altitudes in the Anopoli and Frangokastello areas.Perhaps the single most significant aspect of the Sphakia Survey is its role in the development of rigorous diachronic comparison. Almost all archaeological surveys declare an interest in diachrony. We have from the beginning tried to collect and analyse data from all three epochs of the Survey – Byzantine-Venetian-Turkish as well as Graeco-Roman and Prehistoric – and we have worked hard to find reliable methods of comparison.<b>In the document above,</b> we summarise our results and their significance by epoch. The Archaeological Museum in Khania, where our finds are stored, has many Prehistoric and Graeco-Roman artefacts from west Crete. Click here to visit the website for this museum.The Sphakia Survey has thus been able to document a range of human responses to an arid mountain landscape over a period of some five millennia. The Survey video has proved a useful means of communicating information about the landscape of Sphakia to students, especially in Canada and the U.S., and is also a way of reporting directly to people in Greece; the video was broadcast with Greek subtitles on Greek national television twice in 1996, as arranged through the Greek Embassy in London.Our work has already had policy applications for the Greek Archaeological Service (sites to be protected), and is also beginning to show that in planning it is advisable to consider cultural (archaeological) and natural (environmental) resources not as separate entities, but as part of the same landscape.For a slightly more detailed introduction to the project, read in sequence our three preliminary reports<b>, </b><b>1988</b><b>, </b><b>1989</b><b> and </b><b>1990</b><b> (reprinted here with numerous colour illustrations).</b>If you would like to discuss matters relating to the Sphakia Survey, please contact the University of Oxford's Faculty of Classics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of OxfordTravaux en français237 207