Contestability in human services and its impact on service providers: A case study of community aged care in New South Wales
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A major reason for the substantial marketisation of human services over the last quarter century has been a belief that greater contestability has a positive impact on service providers, by enabling new and innovative providers to enter and giving all incumbents more incentive to improve services. Critics dispute this, claiming that the effects are often negative, allowing the entry of profit-maximisers and generating incentives for all providers to cut costs at the expense of good services. This thesis examines these conflicting claims, both theoretically in relation to human services in general, and through an empirical study of one service in one location. The first part of the thesis considers the theoretical implications for the concept of contestability when the product is a human service, and the resulting effects on the structure and operatipn of markets, the type of providers, and the incentives facing providers. A key aim is to assess marketisation on its own terms as far as possible and examine human services industries in the same way as other industries. An analytical framework grounded in conventional economic theory, but adapted to the reality of human services, is developed to examine con testability in specific markets. This framework is then used for the empirical study of the community aged care industry in New South Wales (NSW). This was a mixed-method study, with data obtained primarily from interviews, document analysis, and analysis of funding data. Both parts of the research show that there is substantial, intrinsic market failure in human services. This creates much scope for poor practice by providers, and requires limits on contestability to maximise the outcomes of services. Notwithstanding this, if implemented in a limited and strategic way, with a small number of providers competing on the basis of quality, then contestability can have positive effects on the capacity of providers to deliver good services. Even though there are tight limits on contestability in the NSW community aged care industry, there has been continuing new entry, vigorous competition, stability in the supply of services, and strong incentives for providers to improve the quality, responsiveness and efficiency of their services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle