The first international study into the characteristics and statistical effectiveness of treatment for Indigenous and First Nations People who have sexually offended: A meta-analysis and survey of routine practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Psycho-criminological literature has continued to examine post-treatment recidivism outcomes homogeneously for people who have sexually offended. Because results indicate clear differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who have sexually offended, this project set out to understand the characteristics and effectiveness of treatment for Indigenous and First Nations people from four jurisdictions: Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. A strategic three study strategy was implemented and resulted in a systematic narrative synthesis, meta-analysis and survey of sexual offender treatment organisations in Australia. The systematic review used a comprehensive and scientifically rigorous approach to identify studies (k = 14) that were critically appraised through an extensive data extraction process to report on demographic, treatment and recidivism data. Novel findings in relation to the characteristics of treatment for Indigenous people and the respective recidivism outcomes were provided. Over half of programs reported using a blended approach to treatment that included Western and culturally relevant practices, with the remaining studies taking a purely Westernised approach. The meta-analysis built on the systematic narrative review by statistically calculating the effectiveness of treatment for Indigenous and First Nations people from studies that contained a comparison group (k = 7). Using odds ratios and a random-effects model, findings suggest that although treatment was effective for Indigenous and First Nations people, it was most effective when programs utilised treatment that was of cultural relevance. Given there is limited published research on treatment outcomes for Indigenous and First Nations people, the final study overcame this barrier by directly surveying treatment providers in Australia (N = 12). This provided a foundation of knowledge and mapped out current practices in the field of treatment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who had sexually offended and received treatment in Australia. Key insights into treatment practices were provided, including the development and theoretical foundations of treatment, current approaches, evaluation efforts and issues concerning the implementation of treatment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Although organisations implemented culturally relevant treatment approaches, it was more common to see Western therapeutic interventions at the forefront of practice. There was a lack of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-specific risk and needs assessment tools, suggesting a lack of adherence to the principles of risk, need and responsivity among these organisations. Overall, results from all studies indicated that more research, stronger methodological approaches and clearer adherence to the principles of risk, need and responsivity were required before more definitive conclusions can be made. There are clear challenges faced by researchers and program facilitators to ensure programs are of a high calibre so that Indigenous and First Nations people achieve positive outcomes of reduced recidivism. Therefore, the thesis concludes with 21 recommendations to ensure the field continues to develop scholarly knowledge on best-practice approaches and methods of delivering treatment to Indigenous and First Nations people.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,059 | 0,186 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,012 | 0,042 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,012 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».