MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6910330487 · doi:10.48336/jb8t-pq61

Monuments and memory: an examination of the Newfoundland and Labrador commemoration landscape and its place in the global monumentality issue

2025· article· en· W6910330487 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLandscape and Cultural Studies
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousColonialismWorld heritageSubject (documents)Subject matterCultural landscape

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This MA dissertation examines the monument landscape in Canada, specifically Newfoundland and Labrador, and how many factors in our society have shaped it. This thesis explores the need for a discussion surrounding the changes seen and not seen in the monument landscape. Currently, the most relevant research on this subject is from the United States, as they are directly dealing with their monuments due to multiple public rallies for the Black Lives Matter movement and other forms of organization. However, we can also see research and change of commemorative heritage in countries such as Germany, England, and Australia. The US and other countries are still working towards a better future, but they have taken the first steps to create change on multiple levels. Although this discussion has been introduced in Canada, the monument landscape seems to lack upheaval, unlike in other countries. Canada has a history of colonialism and discrimination of certain groups, in particular, Indigenous and First Nations peoples. This history is only starting to be called into question. Our ‘negative history,’ Canada’s dark past with multiple attempts at extinguishing the Indigenous and First Nations peoples, tends to be ignored or displayed inaccurately, as seen with many commemorative heritage structures around the country. Monuments have been toppled, and there have been other forms of attack on particularly dated commemorative heritage. However, since there is little to no discussion surrounding the monument landscape, Canada has been unable to make the same progress as the United States. To explore the monument landscape in Canada and think critically about this discussion among the public, I researched through theoretical approaches of relationality, postcolonial (decolonization) theory, landscape memory/public memory, and nationalism and colonialism. I used various methods as I gathered quantitative and qualitative data. The information I collected for the background of monuments came from exploratory research through multiple scholarly and media-based sources. I also conducted online and in-person surveys to explore NL residents’ current views of monuments and their purpose in our society. Interviews followed the online survey with certain participants to gain a more in-depth view of their opinions and gauge their understanding through various questions. Interviews with Indigenous leaders/elders were also conducted to gain an outlook on monuments and Canada’s monument landscape from an Indigenous perspective. The final interviews were targeted towards individuals who had qualities that would help to further the understanding of how monuments work within society. I also catalogued all the monuments in St. John’s in a document that houses the information I could procure for each monument and created an interactive map through Google Maps to showcase where the monuments are located in the city. Through all these forms of research, I gained a comprehensive view and understanding of monuments throughout history and how they continue to work in the modern day as they display history. From my surveys and interviews, there is a widespread (while vague) condemnation of racism, but there are outliers to this notion. No significant population took one side of the discussion, i.e., everything should change or nothing should change. This discussion is difficult to start, as each monument needs guidelines for its change or contextualization. This discussion includes the need for education, Indigenous collaboration, and the consideration of money and power. We must consider the abovementioned ideas to further the discussion of monuments in Canada, both among the public and the three levels of government. I discuss the importance of creating this discussion and how to keep it going by exploring how racism and discrimination have been combated in other workplaces/disciplines. With this, I conclude with future areas of Tuck – MA Thesis research that can be conducted to help keep this discussion moving and to better the outcomes of changing or contextualizing a monument.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,588
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Même sujetLandscape and Cultural StudiesTravaux en français237 207