MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911081586 · doi:10.5066/p13tre2p

Ring widths, scans of samples, and ancillary data from Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) trees and stumps at Fort Ross and Gualala, sampled for dendroseismology in 2021–2024

2025· dataset· en· W6911081586 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUSGS DOI Tool Production Environment · 2025
Typedataset
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSequoiaDendrochronologyTable (database)Ring (chemistry)Tree (set theory)High resolution

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood) trees were sampled for a dendroseismological investigation along the North Coast Section of the San Andreas Fault, and the data were fully analyzed, interpreted, and discussed in a journal article and supplemental material (Carroll et al., 2025). Here, were provide data associated with this work: 1200 dpi resolution images of tree cores and stumps, raw ring width measurements for living trees and stumps with associated crossdating categories, standard tree and location chronologies with sample depths, and descriptions of tree cores. Please refer to the journal article and supplemental material for full details, supporting material, and context. Tree ring samples were collected at two locations: Fort Ross Historic State Park (Fort Ross) and Gualala Redwood Timber Company (Gualala). Eleven living trees (8 at Fort Ross, 3 at Gualala) were climbed with ropes, and 5-mm-diameter increment cores were collected at various positions on the main and reiterated trunks. Skilled sawyers took plunge cuts from 23 Sequoia stumps at Gualala, sometimes taking multiple pieces from one stump. Ring series were scanned at 1200 dpi. Child folders include scans of living tree and stump samples. Pencil marks guide crossdating, but final dating is expressed in the ring width files with associated crossdating categories. Ring widths were measured to 0.001 mm precision using WinDendro software (v.2009b, Régent Instruments Inc., Québec, Canada). Crossdating proceeded using a multi-pronged approach combining visual assessment of marker years with correlation analysis, fully detailed in the journal article. Due to the complex nature of crossdating Sequoia, every year was assigned a level of crossdating confidence following previously defined protocol (Carroll et al., 2014; Carroll and Sillett, 2023) with categories of high and moderate confidence to distinguish sections with some ambiguity. For example, moderate confidence applied when missing ring(s) were known, but the placement may be in several positions. Undated rings were either 1) bound by dated rings, allowing the number of missing rings and total radial growth to be determined or 2) not bound by dated rings, as may occur for inner rings. File “Tree Ring Widths_Carroll et al 2025.xlsx” lists ring width measurements in microns for 126 series from 11 living Sequoia trees at Fort Ross and Gualala. Crossdating categories are color coded, and these categories must be considered for proper use of the data. Measurements with no highlighting are dated with high confidence, measurements highlighted in orange are dated with moderate confidence, measurements highlighted in red are undated. Undated rings do not correspond with calendar years. Zeros (0s) reflect missing rings. Zeros (0s) in undated (red) sections reflect a known number of missing rings but unknown annual placement. Green highlighting reflects broken or crumbly sections. File "TreeRingWidths.json" provides these same data in a more easily machine-readable format. File “Tree Core Logsheet_Carroll et al 2025.csv” lists descriptions associated with these series. File “Stump Ring Widths_Carroll et al 2025.xlsx” lists ring width measurements in microns for 37 sections from 23 Sequoia stumps at Gualala. Crossdating categories are color coded, and these categories must be considered for proper use of the data. Dated or partially dated paths are listed in columns B to S and correspond with calendar years in the first column. Measurements with no highlighting are dated with high confidence, measurements highlighted in orange are dated with moderate confidence, measurements highlighted in red are undated (and do not correspond with calendar years). Zeros (0s) in undated (red) sections reflect a known number of missing rings but unknown annual placement. Completely undated paths are listed in columns U to AM, do not correspond with calendar years, and are listed in descending order (from outer ring toward center). File "StumpRingWidths.json" provides these same data in a more easily machine-readable format. Descriptions of each stump sample are found in the supplementary material of the journal article. Rings dated with high confidence were used to generate inter-annual reference chronologies for each tree and locations. First, tree-level chronologies were produced using only series dated with high confidence. Series were standardized via ARSTAN software (Cook, 1985) using a cubic smoothing spline with a 50 % frequency cutoff at 32-yr (32-yr spline) to remove geometric growth trends and low-frequency variation. Standard (STD) tree chronologies were then combined into location chronologies with no further detrending using a biweight robust mean (Cook and Kairiukstis, 1990). File “Tree and Location Chronologies_Carroll et al 2025.csv” lists the standardized ring indices for each tree and location with associated sample depths.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,223
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUSGS DOI Tool Production EnvironmentTravaux en français237 207