MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911097093 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406151

Scipopus (Scipopus) Lindsay & Marshall, 2023, s. str.

2023· article· en· W6911097093 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThorax (insect anatomy)Orange (colour)Black maleAdult maleDorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Scipopus (Scipopus) s. str. Enderlein, 1922 Scipopus Enderlein, 1922: 208 (type species: Scipopus erythrocephalus (Fabricius, 1805)). Scipopus – Enderlein 1922: 165 (key), 208 (diagnosis, key). — Frey 1927: 68 (keyed), 74 (list). — Cresson 1930: 324 (diagnosis). — Curran 1934a: 450 (keyed), 451 (key); 1934b: 305 (key). — Hennig 1934: 72 (keyed), 321 (diagnosis, key). — Aczél 1949: 339 (catalog); 1951: 534, 538 (key). — Steyskal 1968: 48.15 (catalog). — Albuquerque 1971: 89 (diagnosis). — Schumann 1988: 115 (list). — Marshall 2010: 810 (key), 812 (notes). — Ferro & de Carvalho 2014: 53 (key), 59 (diagnosis, list). — Martinez-Alava & Serna 2015: 345 (distribution). — Marshall et al. 2016: 543 (catalog). — Martinez et al. 2020: 180 (phoretic relationships). Diagnosis Frontal vitta orange. Thorax, abdominal tergites, wings and legs dark brown or black. Thoracic pleuron with varying patterns of white and brown microtrichosity; anepisternum always white microtrichose on majority of anteroventral ⅓ and anteroventral margin, primarily brown microtrichose on at least posterior ⅓. Thorax stout, height greater than length (thorax ratio ≤0.93). Common spermathecal duct rugose, clearly delineated from smooth paired duct; single spermathecal duct arising from basal portion of paired duct. Remarks Scipopus was originally diagnosed by the bare arista, short anal cell (cua) and very short third costal sector, but all of these character states also occur in combination in other species outside of Scipopus. Most relatively large black or dark brown micropezids with a contrasting orange or red head belong to Scipopus s. lat., and all species of Scipopus s. str. have this characteristic colour combination. The characteristic pattern of white microtrichosity on the mesopleuron provides a new, reliably diagnostic character for the subgenus. Description LENGTH. 9–16 mm. HEAD. Antenna orange. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose. Orbital plate dull, orange, microtrichose (Fig. 10A), or with shiny, bare anterior patches (Fig. 11C). Anterior frontal vitta with scattered black setulae. Epicephalon orange to black, either shiny and clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta (Fig. 7C) or dull and not clearly delineated (Fig. 17B). Paracephalon orange to black, shiny, slightly convex (Fig. 22H) to strongly convex with upturned bumps (Fig. 29C). Head chaetotaxy always including inner vertical, postocellar, upper fronto-orbital seta, and 1–2 lower fronto-orbital seta; outer vertical seta usually present (absent in S. (S.) wokomung sp. nov. and sometimes absent in S. (S.) chalybeus). Palpus narrow (length 3.6–6.0× width), nearly parallel-sided, rounded and tapered apically, pale microtrichose and black setulose. Clypeus orange to black, usually twice as wide as high, sometimes much higher than wide (as in S. (S.) convexus sp. nov. and S. (S.) nigripennis) (Fig. 15A), usually bare medially and microtrichose posterolaterally (entirely white microtrichose in S. (S.) chalybeus) (Fig. 13A). THORAX. Cervical sclerite dark brown or black, white microtrichose, subquadrate, usually relatively flat or slightly convex, but anterior part swollen in females of S. (S.) chalybeus (Fig. 13C). Mesothorax robust, only slightly tapered anteriorly. Thorax ratio (length/height) always less than 0.93. Anterior edge of mesonotum elevated (most clearly seen laterally), with surface becoming anteriorly humped (Fig. 13G), convex (Fig. 7D) or relatively flat (Fig. 33B). Postpronotal lobe distinct, dark brown or black, raised, slightly tapered anteriorly, length ~2.0–2.5× height (Fig. 30A). Notopleuron brown or black, often with interspecifically varying patterns of silvery or pale brown microtrichia (Figs 27, 34G). Pleuron dark brown or black with variable patterns of white and brown microtrichosity; anepisternum always white on most of anteroventral ⅓ and anteroventral margin, brown on majority of posterior ⅓ (Fig. 7E). Legs dark brown or black, fore and hind tarsomere 1 partially or entirely white, or entirely black or brown dorsally, often with ventral golden fringe. Scutellum with two long, strong apical setae (2.0× length of scutellum), and 1–3 pairs of short, lateral or dorsolateral discal setulae. WING. Uniformly brown infuscate. ABDOMEN. Tergites dark brown or black. T1 with fine white, and/or black or dark brown setae, remainder of abdomen with short black or dark brown setulae. T1 (especially posterior margin), posterior margin or corners of T2, anterior margin of T3, entirety or lateral edges of T4, and entirety of T5–6 usually very indisctinctly white microtrichose, more obvious in some species (as in S. (S.) planus sp. nov. and S. (S.) convexus sp. nov.). Pleuron with P1, upper half of P2 and sometimes upper half of P3–6 either almost entirely black, pale grey, or off-white and dark brown (Fig. 13G). FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 1.1–2.8× length of T3. Oviscape dark brown or black, variable in dimension but tapered distally and sparsely covered in short black setulae, anterior ⅓ usually entirely or partially white microtrichose (Fig. 6A–B). Common spermathecal duct arising from bursa, roughly textured and ranging from very short (almost absent) (Fig. 11B) to very long (¾ of entire combined duct length) (Fig. 8C), clearly delineated from paired duct. Paired spermathecal duct smooth, ranging from short and wide (Fig. 17E) to long and narrow (Fig. 20B). Paired spermathecal stems bare (Fig. 17E) or with spiked or finger-like projections (Fig. 11B); paired spermatheca striate, usually spherical or ovoid (Fig. 20B), sometimes elongate (Fig.15B). Single spermathecal duct arising from basal portion of paired duct, smooth and narrow, swollen distally, ending in usually one but sometimes two finger- or bulb-like spermathecae (Fig. 14B). MALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 1.4–2.9× length of T3. Genital fork dark brown or black, white microtrichose, arms with inner basal process (Fig. 24B), length and shape of arms and processes variable. Epandrium dark brown or black, white microtrichose and setulose, stout (length ≈ height) to elongate (length ≥ 2.0× height). Basiphallus usually small, crescent-shaped when viewed ventrally (Fig. 22F). Basal distiphallus usually very short and wide (1.0–2.0 × length of phallic bulb), ending or partially enclosing phallic bulb (Fig 10C). Phallic bulb usually short, somewhat spherical, with multiple chambers, sometimes with posterior projections (Fig. 22F). Distal distiphallus short (shorter than epandrium) to long (> 2.0× length of epandrium), usually narrow (Fig. 10C). Phallapodeme slender or broad, may or may not be expanded apically. Ejaculatory apodeme varying in size, usually with a fan-like apodeme attached to a bulbous sperm pump (Fig. 15D).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,080

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyTravaux en français237 207