MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911183646 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10845107

Homocopris punctatissimus

2024· article· en· W6911183646 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRidgeApex (geometry)DorsumHolotypeType locality

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Homocopris punctatissimus (Curtis, 1845) Figs 7–8, 19–20, 28, 34, 44, 67 Copris punctatissima Curtis, 1845: 444 (original description). Copris punctatissima – Solier 1851: 60 (synonymy). — Harold 1869a: 133 (synonym). — Martínez 1959: 87 (synonym). [Copris] punctatissimus – Harold 1869b: 1011 (synonym). — Heyne 1900: 62 (synonym). — Gillet 1911: 62 (synonym). — Blackwelder 1944: 208 (synonym). Copris punctatissimus – Reed 1876: 281 (synonym). — Bruch 1911: 187 (synonym). Pinotus punctatissimus – Waterhouse 1891: 361 (diagnosis). — Luederwaldt 1929: 650 (synonym). Copris Punctatissimus – Gutiérrez 1940: 277 (synonym). Homocopris punctatissimus – González et al. 2015: 53 (bona species, ecology). — Rebolledo et al. 2017: 27 (distribution). — Tello et al. 2021: 139 (distribution). — Mondaca 2023: 222 (checklist, distribution, diagnosis, new combination). Differential diagnosis Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance; lateral pronotal edge broadly arcuate on anterior half in dorsal view; width of ellipse formed by lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge approximately one-half the elliptical length; posterior pronotal surface chagrined; elytral interstriae punctation visible at 10 × magnification; metasternal depression entire, limited to posterior portion of median metasternal lobe. ♂ pronotal ridge with three sets of distinct bilaterally paired tubercles in large individuals; paramere apex acutely tipped; FLP endophallite heavily sclerotized, crescent-shaped, with one end rounded and the other toothed. Name-bearing type data Copris punctatissimus Curtis, holotype ♀ (BMNH): [recto] “Chil” [handwritten]; [verso] “ punctatissima | 63 Curt” [handwritten]; “63 | 49” [handwritten, white disc]; “Type” [disc with red border]; “ Copris Curt | punctatissima ”; [handwritten]. Type locality Copris punctatissimus: Chile. Type material Holotype CHILE • ♀; [recto] “Chil” [handwritten]; [verso] “ punctatissima | 63 Curt” [handwritten]; “63 | 49” [handwritten, white disc]; “Type” [disc with red border]; “ Copris Curt | punctatissima ”; [handwritten]; (BMNH). Material examined (74 ♂♂, 64 ♀♀) CHILE • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; [unspecified locality]; [no date]; [anonymous]; CAS • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; CNC • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; CPFA • 23 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; NMPC • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; [no date]; Clavareau; CAS. – Región de Los Lagos • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; 10 km E of Puyehue; [40°41′ S, 72°18′ W]; 24 Jan. 1951; Ross and Michelbacher; CAS • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Aguas Calientes, Parque Nacional Puyehue; [40°44′20″ S, 72°18′25″ W]; 600 m; 18 Dec. 1984 – 8 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; Nothofagus forest, Malaise; CMNC • 2 ♂♂; Ancud; [41°53′ S, 73°49′ W]; 30 May 1914; [anonymous]; CAS • 1 ♀; Chaitén; [42°54′50″ S, 72°42′4″ W]; Dec. 1985; L. Peña; CMNC • 1 ♂; Dalcahue, Chiloé; [42°22′23″ S, 73°39′9″ W]; Feb. 1952; Peña; CMNC • 1 ♂; Estaquilla; [41°23′30″ S, 73°50′0″ W]; 17 Jan. 1977; J. Solervicens; MNHN • 1 ♂; Fundo El Mirador, Río Chico; [41°23′42″ S, 72°49′17″ W]; 14 Feb. 2008; V.M. Diéguez; CEMT • 1 ♂; Isla Chiloé; [42°38′ S, 73°55′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Los Derrumbes Forest Trail, Aguas Calientes, Parque Nacional Puyehue; [40°44′ S, 72°18′ W]; 500 m; 20 Dec. 1984 – 8 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; flight interception trap; CMNC • 2 ♀♀; Los Muermos; [41°24′ S, 73°28′ W]; 19 Jan. 1951; Ross and Michelbacher; forest; CAS • 4 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀; Pionero Forest Trail, Aguas Calientes, Parque Nacional Puyehue; [40°44′ S, 72°18′ W]; 500 m; 20 Dec. 1984 – 6 Feb. 1985; S. and J. Peck; carrion trap; CMNC • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Puerto Varas; [41°19′ S, 72°59′W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; NMPC • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Purranque; [40°55′ S, 73°10′ W]; Jan. 1951; [anonymous]; CAS. – Región de Los Ríos • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; 34 km WNW of La Union; [40°13′45″ S, 73°21′35″ W]; 700 m; 17 Dec. 1984 – 7 Feb.1985; S. and J. Peck; mixed evergreen forest, flight interception trap; CMNC • 1 ♀; Corral; [39°53′ S, 73°26′ W]; 20 Oct. 1913; R.H. Beck; CAS • 1 ♂ (alloreferent), 1 ♀; Panguipulli; [39°38′20″ S, 72°20′30″ W]; Jan. 1943; Gutiérrez; CMNC • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; Jan. 1952; [anonymous]; CMNC • 4 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; Feb. 1942; Gutiérrez; CMNC • 2 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; 1927; [anonymous]; CAS • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Valdivia; [39°50′ S, 73°13′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; NMPC. – Región de Valparaíso • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Valparaíso; [33°4′ S, 71°36′ W]; [no date]; E.P. Reed; CAS. – Región del Biobío • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Concepción; [36°48′ S, 73°1′ W]; [no date]; Reed; CAS. – Región La Araucanía • 1 ♀; 30 km NE of Villarrica; [39°8′47″ S, 72°3′32″ W]; Jan. 1965; L. Peña; CAS • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; Dec. 1964; L. Peña; CAS • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 16–31 Dec. 1964; M. Rivera; CMNC • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 16–31 Dec. 1964; L. Peña; CAS • 1 ♀; Boroa Central, SE of Nueva Toltén; [39°16′ S, 73°8′ W]; 22 Jan. 2004; M. Snižek; NMPC • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Campground, Parque Nacional Huerquehue; [39°10.026′ S, 71°43.455′ W]; 785 m; Nov.–Dec. 2005; F. Ledezma Zúñiga; CMNC • 1 ♀; Victoria; [38°14′ S, 72°21′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; NMPC. – Región Metropolitana de Santiago • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Santiago; [33°29′ S, 70°39′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; CAS • 1 ♀; Santiago; [33°29′ S, 70°39′ W]; [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN. Description Male alloreferent specimen (Figs 7, 19, 28, 34, 44) MEASUREMENTS. Body length 16.6 mm. HEAD. Clypeus bidentate with broad, rounded teeth. Anteroventral clypeal tooth broad. Clypeal and genal surface rugose, demarcated by shallow notch along edge. Posterior genal angle obtuse. Frontal surface reduced, smooth. Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance. Interocular surface medially smooth. Cephalic horn emerging centrally from clypeofrontal surface, parallel sided, straight, 5.8 mm in length. PROTHORAX. Anterior pronotal edge medially indented. Lateral pronotal edge broadly arcuate on anterior half in dorsal view. Anterolateral pronotal surface smooth, impunctate.Anterior inclined pronotal surface with irregular, fused rugosities. Pronotal ridge with three sets of distinct bilaterally paired tubercles. Posterior pronotal surface chagrined. Prosternal apex acutely tipped. ELYTRA. Glossy overall. Striae 1-6 widest anteriorly; narrowing posteriorly. Third and fourth striae posteriorly joined. Eighth stria absent throughout. Ninth stria effaced along anterior quarter of elytral length. Interstriae convex, minutely punctate. HINDWING. Membrane edge between AP and AA sinuous. AP vein entire, converging with J. VENTRITES. Meso-metasternal suture straight. Median metasternal lobe (Fig. 44) with deep posteromedial impression; anterior surface convex. Lateral metasternal lobe sparsely setose. Fifth abdominal ventrite with dense medial punctation. Pygidium coarsely punctate. PROTHORACIC LEGS. Anterior and posterior surfaces of profemur with sparse row of long dark setae. Ventral profemoral surface finely punctate. Protibia with three distinct teeth. Protibial forespur parallel-sided, curving downward apically. MESOTHORACIC LEGS. Posterior surface of mesotrochanter with three dark setae. Anterior and posterior surface of mesofemur with sparse row of long dark setae. Outer surface of mesotibia serrate. Width at mesotibial apex one-third mesotibial length. METATHORACIC LEGS. Posterior surface of metatrochanter with three dark setae. Anterior and posterior surface of metafemur with sparse row of long dark setae. Outer surface of metatibia serrate. Width at metatibial apex one-third metatibial length. MALE GENITALIA. Aedeagus length: 4.6 mm. Medially paired sclerites of genital segment truncated. Paramere (Fig. 28) with apex acutely tipped. FLP endophallite (Fig. 34) heavily sclerotized, crescent-shaped, with one end rounded, another toothed. Female (Figs 8, 20) As male alloreferent with the following exceptions: body length 20.0 mm. Clypeal teeth deeply notched. Clypeofrontal carina transverse, centrally raised. Entire anterior pronotal surface with irregular, fused rugosities. Anterior pronotal ridge low, followed by shallow concavity. Protibial forespur straight throughout. Variation Body length 15–22 mm. Small males with medially projecting clypeofrontal ridge instead of cephalic horn. Pronotal ridge in small males low, medially notched. Large ♀♀ with bi-tubercular clypeofrontal. Distribution (Fig. 67) Chile in the Región de los Lagos, Región de Los Ríos, Región de Valparaíso, Región del Biobío, Región la Araucanía and Región Metropolitana de Santiago. Recorded elevations from 500 m to 785 m. Natural history Examined specimens with data were collected in unspecified forest type, mixed evergreen forest and Nothofagus Blume forest. Data for the material examined indicate that specimens were collected in pitfall traps baited with unspecified carrion and flight interception traps. A few specimens were collected in Malaise traps. No recorded trapping events from dung in the material examined, certainly due to a lack of data.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,085

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetAmphibian and Reptile Biology→Travaux en français237 207→