MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911294793 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10845114

Homocopris williami Darling & Genier 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6911294793 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiquePaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeRidgeType localityParatypeDerogationApex (geometry)Species name

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Homocopris williami Darling & Génier sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 94FAF15A-7945-460D-BF15-69FB3D05CBD0 Figs 11–12, 23–24, 30, 36, 55, 66 Pinotus torulosus – Lange 1947: 313 (distribution). Differential diagnosis Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance; anteromedial pronotal edge curvature tends to be continuous; posterior pronotal surface uniformly punctate; elytral interstriae punctation tends to be visible at 10 × magnification; metasternal depression divided anteriorly. ♂ pronotal ridge with two sets of distinct bilaterally paired tubercles in large individuals; paramere apex evenly rounded; FLP endophallite elongate, with two indentations along right edge. Etymology Williami is the Latin singular genitive form of William. This species is named in honour of the second author’s brother, William Darling. Name-bearing type data Holotype ♂ (MZSP) (Fig. 55): “ BRASIL: SÃO PAULO | 50km SE Mogi das Cruzes | Serra do Mar, Est. Biol. | Boracéia, 800-900m, 28-30. | IV.1997, F. Génier & S. Ide | ex. carrion trap, cloud forest”; “ WORLD | SCARAB. | DATABASE | WSD00035694” [barcode label]; “ HOLOTYPE ♂ | Homocopris | williami | Des. Darling & Génier, 2018” [on red card with black border]. Type locality Estação Biológica de Boracéia, 23°38′55″ S, 45°52′20″ W, 800–900 m, Salesópolis, Serra do Mar Mountains, São Paulo, Brazil. Type material Holotype BRASIL • ♂ (Fig. 55); São Paulo, Salesópolis, Estação Biológica de Boracéia, 50 km SE of Mogi das Cruzes, Serra do Mar; [23°38′55″ S, 45°52′20″ W]; 800–900 m; 28–30 Apr. 1997; F. Génier and S. Ide; cloud forest, dung trap; MZSP. Allotype BRASIL • ♀; same collection data as for holotype; MZSP. Other material examined (55 ♂♂, 32 ♀♀) Paratypes BRAZIL – Rio de Janeiro • 5 ♂♂; Nova Friburgo, Upper Macaé River (“ Haut Rio Macaé ”); [22°23′ S, 42°28′ W]; Apr. 1884; P. Germain; MNHN • 1 ♂; unspecified locality]: [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN. – Rio Grande do Sul • 2 ♀♀; Nova Prata; [28°47′ S, 51°36′ W]; 30 Sep. 2001; C. Arioli; CEMT • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀; São Francisco de Paula; [29°26′49″ S, 50°34′45″ W]; 14 Jan. 2008; L. Audino; human dung; CEMT. – Santa Catarina • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Bom Jardim da Serra; [28°20′30″ S, 49°37′30″ W]; Dec. 2001; C. Arioli; CEMT • 3 ♂♂; same locality as for preceding; Jan. 2002; C. Arioli; CEMT • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 28 Dec. 2001; C. Arioli; CEMT • 4 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; 3 Jan. 2002; C. Arioli; CEMT • 1 ♂; Campos Novo; [27°23′ S, 51°12′ W]; Feb. 2011; R.C. Campos; pitfall trap; CEMT • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; Feb. 2013; R.C. Campos; pitfall trap; CEMT • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Monte Castelo; [26°43′ S, 50°19′ W]; 881 m; 6 Aug. 2012; A.L. Brandl; mata nativa, pitfall trap; CEMT • 1 ♂; Seara, Nova Teutônia; [27°11′ S, 52°23′ W]; [no date]; F. Plaumann; CAS • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; Jun.; F. Plaumann; CAS • 2 ♂♂; same locality as for preceding; Sep.; F. Plaumann; CAS • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; Nov.; F. Plaumann; CAS • 1 ♂; same collection data for preceding; GHCM • 1 ♂; Urubici; [27°59′ S, 49°35′ W]; 25 Nov. 2012; J.A. Bogoni; pitfall trap; CEMT • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Urubici; [28°8′21″ S, 49°37′51″ W]; 1300 m; 17 Dec. 2015; P.G. da Silva; pitfall trap: human feces; CEMT • 1 ♀; Urubici; [28°9′32″ S, 49°37′49″ W]; 1600 m; 20 Nov. 2015; P.G. da Silva; pitfall trap: human feces; CEMT • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 17 Dec. 2015; P.G. da Silva; pitfall trap: human feces; CEMT • 2 ♂♂; same locality as for preceding; 23 Apr. 2016; P.G. da Silva; pitfall trap: human feces; CEMT. – São Paulo • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CEMT • 8 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same locality as for holotype; 28–30 Apr. 1997, F. Génier and S. Ide; cloud forest, carrion trap; CMNC • 12 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀; same locality as for holotype; 28–30 Apr. 1997; F. Génier and S. Ide; cloud forest, dung trap; CMNC • 1 ♂; same locality as for holotype; 28–30 Apr. 1997; F. Génier and S. Ide; cloud forest, feces trap; CMNC • 1 ♀; Salesópolis, Estação Biológica de Boracéia; [23°38′55″ S, 45°52′20″ W]; 22 Sep. 1965; [anonymous]; CEMT • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 6 Oct. 1965; [anonymous]; dung; CEMT • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 21 Sep. 2012; A. Díaz; Atlantic Forest, human feces; CEMT • 1 ♂; Santo André, Estação Biológica do Alto da Serra; [23°47′ S, 46°18′ W]; Apr. 1926; [anonymous]; MZSP • 1 ♂; São Miguel Arcanjo, Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho; [24°3′59″ S, 47°59′39″ W]; 580 m; 13 May 2012; M. Boutefeu; Tapirus feces; CEMT • 1 ♂; same locality as for preceding; 15 May 2012; M. Boutefeu; Tapirus feces; CEMT • 1 ♂; São Miguel Arcanjo, Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho; [24°3′40″ S, 47°58′44″ W]; 806 m; 29 Jan. 2012; E. Bovy (1); human feces; CEMT • 3 ♀♀; São Miguel Arcanjo, Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho; [24°3′46″ S, 47°58′44″ W]; 823 m; 29 Jan. 2012; E. Bovy (2); human feces; CEMT • 2 ♂♂; [no date]; [anonymous]; MNHN. Description Male holotype (Figs 11, 23, 30, 36) MEASUREMENTS. Body length 15.1 mm. HEAD. Clypeus bidentate with broad, rounded teeth. Anteroventral clypeal tooth broad. Clypeal and genal surface rugose, clypeogenal suture demarcated by shallow notch. Posterior genal angle obtuse. Frontal surface reduced, smooth. Dorsal ocular width subequal to one-sixth interocular distance. Interocular surface medially smooth. Cephalic horn emerging centrally from clypeofrontal surface, tapering apically, gently curved, 4.7 mm in length. PROTHORAX. Anteromedial pronotal edge curvature continuous. Lateral pronotal edge angular on anterior fourth in dorsal view. Anterior inclined pronotal surface with fine, transverse rugosities. Pronotal ridge with two sets of distinct bilaterally paired tubercles. Posterior pronotal surface uniformly punctate. Prosternal apex acutely tipped. ELYTRA. Glossy overall. Striae 1–6 widest anteriorly; narrowing posteriorly. Third and fourth striae posteriorly joined. Eighth stria absent throughout. Ninth stria effaced along anterior quarter of elytral length. Interstriae convex, finely punctate. HINDWING. Membrane edge between AP and AA sinuous. AP vein entire, converging with J. VENTRITES. Meso-metasternal suture straight. Surface of median metasternal lobe with uneven texture and deep, anteriorly divided impression. Lateral metasternal lobe densely setose. Fifth abdominal ventrite with sparse medial punctation. Pygidium coarsely punctate. PROTHORACIC LEGS. Anterior and posterior surfaces of profemur with dense row of long dark setae. Ventral profemoral surface finely punctate, sparsely setose. Protibia with three distinct teeth. Protibial forespur apically tapered, curving inward. MESOTHORACIC LEGS. Posterior surface of mesotrochanter with tuft of long dark setae. Anterior and posterior surfaces of mesofemur with sparse row of long dark setae. Outer surface of mesotibia serrate. Width at mesotibial apex one-third mesotibial length. METATHORACIC LEGS. Posterior surface of metatrochanter with tuft of long dark setae. Anterior and posterior surfaces of metafemur with sparse row of long dark setae. Outer surface of metatibia serrate. Width at metatibial apex one-third metatibial length. MALE GENITALIA. Aedeagus length: 3.5 mm. Medially paired sclerites of genital segment elongate, subequal in length to lateral sclerites. Paramere (Fig. 30) laterally flattened, slightly tapering from base to apex with apex evenly rounded. FLP endophallite (Fig. 36) elongate with two indentations along right edge. Female allotype (Figs 12, 24) Similar to male with the following exceptions: Body length 14.3 mm. Clypeofrontal carina transverse, centrally raised. Interocular surface chagrined. Anterior pronotal ridge low, followed by shallow concavity. Variation Body length 13–19 mm. Small males with medially projecting clypeofrontal ridge instead of cephalic horn. Anteromedial pronotal edge evenly curved more often than indented. Pronotal ridge in small males low, medially notched. Elytral interstriae finely punctate (visible at 10 ×) more often than minutely punctate (invisible at 10 ×). Distribution (Fig. 66) Serra do Mar and Serra Geral Mountains in the Brazilian states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul, with recorded elevations from 800 to 1600 m. Natural history Specimens with data were collected in cloud and sub-montane Atlantic Forest. Some specimens came to carrion and dung traps, pitfall traps baited with human faeces and faeces of Tapirus Brisson, 1762 at elevations between 580 m and 1600 m. Identification key to species of Homocopris Burmeister, 1846 and Andinocopris gen. nov. 1 Dorsal ocular width greater than one quarter of interocular distance; lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge joined anteriorly and posteriorly, forming a closed ellipse in lateral view (Figs 13– 16); meso-metasternal suture posteriorly arcuate between mesocoxae (Fig. 60). Metasternum broadly flat (Fig. 42), some individuals with a narrow and shallow longitudinal sulcus. ♂ pronotal armament forming an overhanging ridge or bifurcating projection in large individuals (Figs 13, 15). Colombia, Ecuador, Peru .............................................................................................. Andinocopris gen. nov. 2 – Dorsal ocular width approximately one sixth of interocular distance; lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge only joined anteriorly, forming an open ellipse in lateral view (Figs 17–24); meso-metasternal suture approximately straight between median coxae (Fig. 61); metasternum with a large median depression (Figs 43–45). ♂ pronotal armament forming bilaterally paired tubercles along an inclined ridge in large individuals (Figs 5, 7, 9, 11). Chile, Argentina, Brazil .................... .......................................................................................................... Homocopris Burmeister, 1846 3 2. Elytral interstriae flat (Fig. 46). Fifth abdominal ventrite with dense setigerous punctation. Body length: 20–34 mm. Colombia, Ecuador (Carchi) ...................

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→Travaux en français237 207→