MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911590712 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13274548

Orthonevra shannoni

2024· article· en· W6911590712 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDorsumDorsal finCompound eyeSnoutCrestWhite (mutation)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Orthonevra shannoni (Curran, 1926) Chrysogaster shannoni Curran 1926: 119. Type-locality: Costa Rica, San Mateo, Higito [ca 9°56'03.1"N 84°31'27.7"W] (HT male USNM). Fluke 1957: 50 (catalog citation). Orthonevra shannoni. Thompson et al. 1976: 91 (catalog citation); Thompson 2006: 121 (catalog citation), 22 (key reference). Figs 34 and 35. Map: Fig. 39 Redescription. MALE. Head (Fig 34d–f): metallic blue, face with slight convexity in profile and ventral ¼ slightly produced anteriorly as a weak convexity, regulose except for smooth area between the oral margin and convexity, shiny, with sparse white pile and not scale-like; with small white microtrichose subtriangular macula laterally, positioned immediately ventral to antennal base and widely separated from it. Antenna yellow, except post-pedicel mostly dark but with pale base; pedicel twice the length of the scape, postpedicel oval elongated, 1.5 × the length of the pedicel. Mala slightly produced apico-ventrally, with weak regulae. Gena shiny, smooth, and with white pile. Frontal triangle shiny, regulose, bare except for distinct erect white pile anterior to eye contiguity and following eye margin, with median longitudinal groove not reaching the lunule. Vertical triangle isosceles triangle-shaped, 2 × longer than eye contiguity, metallic green, with very short and sparse pale pile on ocellar triangle and posterior to it. Occiput not visible laterally on dorsal 1/3, ventral 2/3 homogeneously covered in white microtrichia, with very short black pile on dorsal 1/3, bare medially, and with sparse and slightly longer white pile on ventral ¼. Eyes holoptic; covered with dark spots, medially the markings form two to four irregular circular markings. Thorax (Fig. 34d, e): metallic blue-green, mostly bare, with a few very short pale pile laterally; scutum with four complete dark matte vittae, but medial pair mostly fused posteriorly, with a short narrow lateral vittate macula posterior to transverse sulcus; scutellum metallic blue-green with medial matte black vitta as wide as fused medial vittae of scutum, and matte dark laterally, mostly bare with very short pale pile baso-laterally. Pleuron metallic blue, smooth on anterior anepisternum and proepimeron, with short white pile on antepronotum, proepisternum, ventral patch on katepisternum, katatergum and metasternum, inconspicuous on posterior anepisternum, dorsal patch of katepisternum. Dorsal lobe of calypter white with white marginal pile, ventral lobe white with longer white marginal pile. Plumule white. Halter yellowish. Legs (Fig. 34e): dark with metallic blue reflections, except apex of femora, basal 1/3 of tibiae and tarsomeres 1–2 yellow. Legs covered with short pale pile, slightly longer postero-apically on mesofemur, apex of mesotibia and mesotarsomeres with ventral black setulae, metafemur with ventral surface with short, black setulae. Wing (Fig. 34d): hyaline, with dark vittae sub-apically (from end of R2+3 until the end of M1), sub-apically on r1, and on dm-m, with one weak fasciate macula in cells r2+3 and dm and two in r4+5, and a faded spot apically in r2+3 and posteriorly to end of R4+5; stem vein and vein C pale basally, wholly microtrichose except for small bare area posterior to pseudovein; basicosta with short appressed white pile and one prominent black seta apically. Alula large, 2 × the width of the c cell. Abdomen (Fig. 34d, e): metallic blue, terga 2–4 matte black on apical margin, pile sockets as small protuberances, pile inconspicuous white, appressed and short, much longer and erect baso-laterally on tergum 2; sterna metallic, with white appressed pile; sternum 4 with right side slightly produced. Genitalia (Fig. 35c–f)): surstylus bent in a right angle at basal ¼, basal ¼ with a subtle rounded carina anteriorly, with a ventral triangular lamina sub-basally, and apex slightly acute, with long pile sparsely distributed dorsally (Fig. 35c); cercus sub-triangular, with concave dorsal margin, with long pile. Hypandrium compressed submedially, with anterior narrow ventral notch V-shaped through ½ the length of the hypandrium, notch with carina on each side, ending anteriorly on flattened bi-lobate projection (ventral sub-basal lobe minuscule, dorsa lobe finger-like in profile) (Fig. 35e); postgonites laterally compressed, bi-lobate (ventral lobe as a sub-triangular lamina, dorsal lobe slightly converging towards the middle), with dense pile on dorsal and lateral surfaces (Fig. 35d); phallus compact, with apex forming a ventral acute projection, with apico-dorsal short carinae, basal tubular process as a long sclerotized tube, gently curving and directed apically (Fig. 35f). FEMALE (Figs 34a–c, 35a, b). Like male except: more metallic blue; frons metallic blue, wide, strongly regulose, with a medial longitudinal groove extending from ocellar triangle through the dorsal ¾ of the frons; wing with apex more distinctly dark; tergum 5 entire. Genitalia (Fig. 35a, b): Tergum 7 as roughly sclerotized squared areas, bare. Sternum 7 as a sclerotized strip, with pile on apical margin. Tergum 8 as two sub-triangular plates, bare. Sternum 8 heart-shaped (in ventral view) with sub-triangular indentation on apical margin, sclerotized, mostly pilose, with apico-lateral depression. Sternum 9 as a pair of two irregular sclerotized strips flanking the genital opening. Epiproct dorsal surface convex, sub-quadrate, with convex apical margin, with two very short baso-lateral apodemes, pilose on apical ½. Cercus oval, mostly pilose, positioned apico-ventrally to epiproct. Hypoproct as a membranous mostly pilose area, slightly sclerotized apically. Length. Body 4.54–4.99mm (n=2), wing 3.38–3.54mm (n=2); female 4.7mm (n=2), female 3.5–3.6mm (n=3). Distribution. Brazil (Roraima), Colombia, and Costa Rica (Fig. 39). Altitudinal range. 250–2560m. Comments. The eye pattern promptly distinguishes this species from other Orthonevra; the spots form circular markings medially (Fig. 34c, f) similar to the vittate markings present in the other species. The female epiproct is similar to that of O. neiae sp. nov., but proportions of segment 8 and the proctiger can distinguish them apart quickly. Type material examined: COSTA RICA. Alajuela, San Mateo, Higuito [ca 9°56’03.1”N 84°31’27.7”W], ??.??.????, P. Schild (male holotype shannoni USNM, USNMENT 00028640). Additional material examined: BRAZIL. Roraima, Alto Alegre, FLONA [ca 2°58’09.7”N 61°45’50.3”W], Malaise, 17.v.2018, R. Boldrini (1 female INPA, MMMS0063); Amajari, SESC Tepequém [ca 3°45’20.5”N 61°43’01.0”W], Malaise, 11–15.x.2016, R. Boldrini (1 female INPA, MMMS0064). COLOMBIA. Cartago, Valle del Cauca, 14.xii.2022, 4°44’50.0”N 75°54’41.9”W (1 female, photographic record) [https://www.inaturalist.org/ observations/144478648]. COSTA RICA. San Jose, Est. Santa Helena, Las Nubes [ca 9°59’04.9”N 83°55’08.4”W], 1210m, 5–21.vii.1996, M. Segura (1 male USNM, INBIOCRI002 469598).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,064

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetParasite Biology and Host Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→