MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911744200 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15338910

Reproduction Package for CAV 2025 Submission `Btor2-Select: Machine Learning Based Algorithm Selection for Hardware Model Checking'

2025· other· en· W6911744200 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtifact (error)Selection (genetic algorithm)Reliability (semiconductor)Set (abstract data type)Scripting languageSoftware

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This artifact is a reproduction package for the manuscript “Btor2-Select: Machine Learning Based Algorithm Selection for Hardware Model Checking” (#16), submitted to CAV 2025. It is archived on Zenodo with the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.15338910. The manuscript investigates machine-learning-based algorithm selection for hardware model checking in the Btor2 language. It proposes a framework to train an algorithm selector that predicts the best available off-the-shelf model checker for a given verification task. The selector then invokes the predicted backend model checker to solve the task. This artifact supports the reproduction of: the training of the algorithm selector using the provided performance data and the evaluation of the algorithm selector (integrated with backend model checkers) against state-of-the-art hardware model checkers. The artifact consists of source code, precompiled executables, and input data used in the training and evaluation of the manuscript, as well as the results produced from the experiments. Specifically, it includes the selector trained by our framework, the backend verifiers to be selected, a set of Btor2 verification tasks collected for training and evaluation, the experimental data generated from the evaluation, and instructions to run the tools and experiments. Badge Claims We claim all three badges: Available, Functional, and Reusable. The artifact is available because it is archived on Zenodo with a DOI; It is functional because (1) it includes all the required dependencies, raw data, source code, and evaluation scripts bundled (completeness); (2) it can reproduce the results in the manuscript (consistency); and (3) the evaluation is conducted using BenchExec, which ensures the reliability of performance measurement and the correctness of verification results (correctness). We also provide license and detailed documentation for the usage of our software to facilitate the reuse of (part of) the artifact in other contexts. Our open-source project includes the license, up-to-date dependencies, and detailed instructions on building, interfacing, and usage on different environments. Artifact Requirements This reproduction package works best with the SoSy-Lab Virtual Machine, which runs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and has all the required dependencies installed. If you test the artifact with this VM, you do not need to install any package. Please login the VM as user vagrant via GUI or SSH. The VM has been tested with VirtualBox 7.0 on a Linux (Ubuntu 24.04) computer. The benchmarking framework BenchExec used in our experiments relies on control groups and namespaces provided by modern Linux kernels. Our tool, Btor2-Select, was tested with Python 3.12. Additionally, one of the compared tools, super_prove, is executed in a containerized environment with Podman (tested with version 4.9.3). To perform most of the experiments included in this artifact, a machine with 16 GB of RAM, 4 CPU cores, and 15 GB of disk space is needed. Reproducing the training of certain models with the exact settings used in our manuscript requires more than 50 GB of RAM. We also provide a lightweight setting that allows these models to be trained with only 16 GB of RAM, while maintaining similar performance to the original configuration. A full reproduction of the training part required over 25 hours of wall-clock time on a server equipped with 2 TB of RAM and two 2.0 GHz AMD EPYC 7713 CPUs, each with 128 processing units. The evaluation phase consumed more than 346 hours of CPU time on machines with 3.4 GHz processors. For demonstration purposes, a subset of benchmark tasks can be used. Training on a subset of 450 Btor2 tasks took approximately less than a minute, while evaluation on 30 selected simple Btor2 tasks took roughly 5 minutes on a standard laptop. This artifact README includes time estimates for the various commands referenced throughout. Contents This artifact contains the following items: README.{html,md}: this documentation (we recommend viewing the HTML version with a browser) cav2025-paper16.pdf: the submitted manuscript LICENSE.txt: license information of the artifact btor2-select/: the machine-learning-based framework for algorithm selection and the trained selector (our open-source project, at commit b60d073d) bin/: contains the executables of Btor2-Select and Btor2-Para (a parallel portfolio constructed for evaluating Btor2-Select) btor2select/: contains the main production codes for Btor2-Select, including: btor2_select.py: performs inference using the trained selector and executes the selected backend model checker train.py: trains the proposed algorithm selector cross_validation.py: conducts cross-validation analysis Other supporting scripts for different ML models, e.g., PWC-SVM-BoKW, PWC-SVM-WL data/demo/: a small collection of Btor2 verification tasks and their performance data, intended for use in a training demo. README: for additional information perf-eval-hwmc: a directory for evaluating performance of backend model checkers, consisting of: benchmarks/: a set of Btor2 verification tasks collected for training and evaluation dataset/: the performance dataset used for training verifiers/: tool archives of several backend model checkers (including both hardware and software verifiers) benchexec/: a checkout of BenchExec, a reliable benchmarking framework with precise resource management, used to perform the evaluation bench-defs/: benchmark definitions used by BenchExec README: for further information data-submission/: a directory containing the raw and processed data obtained from our experiments cross_val/: the cross-validation results evaluation/: the evaluation results of Btor2-Select, Btor2-Para, ABC, and super_prove paper-results/: the results presented in the manuscript demo-results/: the results of the demo runs Makefile: a file that assembles commands for running experiments and processing data

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,580
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,598

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,035
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0040,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,5800,391

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Travaux en français237 207→