MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911788919 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218332

Empis (Enoplempis) chillcotti Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6911788919 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Établissements canadiensCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeTerrace (agriculture)PeninsulaUndergrowthBay

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Empis (Enoplempis) chillcotti sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: AAF4CB1C-F93A-46FF-9B6E-C0FC68AAA73A (Figs 94–96, 101, 129) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ (Fig. 94), labelled: “Lakelse L. [54°23′N 128°31′W] bog/ nr. Terrace, B.C./ 14.VI 1960 / J.G. Chillcott ”; “on Ledum/ blossoms”; “ CNC/ 1078367 ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / chillcotti Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (CNC). PARATYPES: CANADA. British Columbia: Same data as holotype (2♂, 10♀, CNC); same data as holotype except, S of Terrace, 27.vi.1960, B. Heming (1♀, CNC); Haida Gwaii, Graham Is., Lepus Bay [54.166°N 133.033°W], intertidal, 15.vii.1988, S.A. Marshall (1♀, DEBU); Kleanza Ck, 14 mi. E Terrace [54°35′N 128°24′W], 250 ft, 17.vi.1960, B. Heming (2♂, CNC); same data except, CHM (1♂, CNC); same data except, wet scrub in cut over forest, JGC (1♂, CNC); same data except, 29.vi,1960, wet scrubby clearing, (2♂, CNC); same data except, on liliaceous undergrowth hemlock forest (1♂, 1♀, CNC); Hot Springs Area, Lakelse L. [54°21′N 128°32′W], 14.vi.1960, G.E. Shewell (2♂, CNC); Lakelse L. nr Terrace [54°23′N 128°31′W], 300 ft, 14.vi.1960, W.W. Moss (3♂, 4♀, CNC); same data except, R. Pilfrey (1♀, CNC); 9 mi. W Terrace [54°27′N 128°47′W], 3.vi.1960, B.S. Herring [sic] (4♂, 1♀, CNC); same data except 10 mi. W Terrace, 9.vi.1960, JGC (1♂, CNC); Prince Rupert [54°18′N 130°19′W], 4.vi.1960, B. Heming (2♂, 1♀, CNC); Victoria, Mt Douglas [48.4933°N 123.3453°W], 3.vi.1959, E.E. MacDougall (1♀, CNC); Zymoetz R, 6 mi. E Terrace [54°32′N 128°28′W], 3.vi.1960, JGC (3♂, 1♀, CNC). USA. Alaska: Kenai Peninsula Borough: Seward [60°07′N 149°26′W], 26.vii.1921 (2♂, USNM). Washington: Clallum County: Olympic NP, meadow below Sunrise Ridge, Mt Angeles [47°59′N 123°28′W], 1550 m, 24.vii.1978, DDW (1♂, CAS). Mason County: Lk. Cushman [47°25′N 123°13′W], 27.vi.1917, H.G. Dyar (1♂, USNM). San Juan County: Mt Constitution [48°40′N 122°49′W], 17.v.1910 (3♂, 1♀, USNM). Yakima County: 8 mi. SW Tieton RS, Snoqualmie NF, Bear Ck [46°42′N 120°45′W], 11–12.vi.1973, D. Corredor (1♂, WSU); same data except, MT with dry ice, WJT (1♂, WSU); same data except, 24–25.vi.1973 (1♀, WSU). Possible additional material (unassociated female). USA. Alaska: Thane [58°15′N 134°19′W], 1.vii.1952 (1♀, USNM). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) canaster species group by two paint brush-like preapical ventral lobes on the male hind femur, two digitiform basal processes on the male hind tibia (Figs 95, 96), hypandrium with long setae, and the length of the dorsal setae of the male hind tibia less than twice width of tibia (Fig. 94). Description. Wing length 6.5–7.6 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) canaster, except as follows: head with ocellar triangle with pair of short, parallel ocellar setae, nearly subequal to length of triangle. Postpedicel and stylus dark; inner base of postpedicel, pedicel and scape yellowish brown. Thorax with postpronotum with 1–2 short setae and several short setulae. Scutum with short, fine uniserial acr; dc uniserial, slightly longer, stronger than acr, increasing in length posteriorly; 1 long posterior npl, with several short anterior npl; 1 short presut spal; 0–1 psut spal; 1 short pal. Scutellum with 1 widely separated pair of long sctl, aligned with dc row, with 1 outer, shorter pair of marginal setulae; disc bare. Laterotergite with narrow patch of 2–3 strong, dark setae. Legs slender, yellow, apex of tibiae and tarsi darker; coxae yellowish, thinly clothed in greyish pruinescence (Fig. 94). Fore femur clothed in short, black setae. Fore tibia with 3–4 long anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae on apical third, longer than width of tibia; apical half with long posterior setae; ring of outstanding preapical setae; anterior face clothed in dense short setulae. Fore tarsomere 1 swollen, as broad as basal width of tibia, with long, strong ventral setae, nearly as long as width of tarsomere; tarsomeres 2–5 with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Mid femur clothed in short, black setae, with anteroventral row of short, slender setae. Mid tibia with 3–4 posterior and posteroventral setae, subequal to width of femur; several preapical setae surrounding apex; 3–4 anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, subequal to width of femur. Mid tarsus similar to fore tarsus. Hind femur with 2 preapical, paint brush-like ventral processes and outer curved posteroventral digitiform process without setae; outer paint brush-like process broader than inner paint brush-like process; without knob-like process or ridge posterior to paint brush-like processes; apex of femur without preapical row of posterior setae; preapical anterior seta strong, shorter than width of femur (Figs 95, 96). Hind tibia with narrow posteroventral digitiform process on basal quarter, with black setae along margin and apex, longer than process; anteroventral digitiform process similar to posteroventral process with long setae confined to apex, with knob-like swelling at base; with seta in posteroapical comb; apical two-thirds with long dorsal setae, longer apically, slightly longer than width of tibia (Figs 95, 96). Hind tarsomere 1 somewhat inflated, with 2 pairs of long dorsal setae, similar to tibia; tarsomeres 2–5 similar to mid tarsus. Abdomen with sclerites of segment 8 narrowly separated, fused anteriorly. Terminalia (Fig. 101): orange brown, shiny with cercus dark brown. Cercus rectangular, subequal to length of epandrium; dorsal margin depression medially; apex truncate, strongly sclerotized; setae longer than width of cercus; weakly fused anteriorly to epandrium. Subepandrium without process; with row of medium-length setae. Epandrial lamella subtriangular, higher than long; posterior margin rounded without projection, with setae concentrated along posterior margin; setae shorter than epandrium. Hypandrium short, truncate, slightly projected laterally; numerous setae of variable lengths present, some twice length of hypandrium. Phallus very narrow and tubular basally; strongly expanded on basal half, tapered, mostly straight apically; apex not emerging beyond cercus; apex not expanded; ejaculatory apodeme longer than length of epandrium, T-shaped, with ventrally positioned lateral apodemes. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons broader, nearly as wide as ocellar triangle; hindleg without modified setae and processes. Abdominal pleural membrane apparently not expanded; tergite 8 subshiny, with thin pruinescence. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 129). Empis (En.) chillcotti sp. nov. is known from Alaska, British Columbia and Washington. Adults have been collected from May to July. Etymology. This species is named in honour of the late James (Jim) G. Chillcott (CNC), who collected the holotype and many other valuable empidoid specimens. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,130
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,259

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMarine Biology and Ecology Research→Travaux en français237 207→