MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911845560 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15236815

Dasyhelea wilkeningi Grogan & Hribar, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6911845560 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésApex (geometry)Whorl (mollusc)SetaScapeDorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dasyhelea wilkeningi sp. nov. (Figs. 33–40) Diagnosis. A very small species that differs from other species in the D. atlantis-bermudae complex by the following combination of characters: male aedeagi with a slender, vasiform, greatly elongate disto-medial process, the apical 1/3 is tapered distally with a slightly flared apex and greatly elongated apicolateral arms; gonocoxal apodemes and paramere fused at mid-lengths, forming a long extension that extends to or beyond the apex of the aedeagus; wing short (length 0.57–0.67 mm), with a short costa (costal ratio 0.38–0.40); and a very small antennal ratio (0.62–0.76). Females very small (wing length 0.44–0.67 mm) with a short costa (costal ratio 0.37–0.42); their abdomens are covered with dense long setae that are often lost during clearing and slide-mounting; they have a large golden colored spermatheca shaped like a pincushion with very thick walls and a short to elongate dorsal neck. Male. Head (Fig. 33): Dark brown. Eyes contiguous for the distance of the length of 6 ommatidia, with short dense inter-ommatidial pubescence. Frontal sclerite elliptical as typical for other species in the D. mutabilis group, but with heavily sclerotized distolateral margins and a slender ventral process that extends between medial margins of antennal pedicels.Antennal flagellum medium light brown, flagellomeres with well-developed surface reticulations; flagellomeres 1–4, 10–13 separate, 5–9 partially or completely fused; flagellomere 2 globular, somewhat flattened, 3–4 rhomboidal, 5–9 vasiform, 10–13 elongate, much longer than 2–9, 13 longest; flagellomeres 1–12 with subbasal whorl of sensilla chaetica, these greatly elongate on flagellomeres 2–10, comprising the moderately dense plume that extends beyond flagellomere 12; antennal ratio 0.62–0.76 (0.67, n=10); total flagellum length 0.357 –0.417 (0.390, n=10) mm. Palpus pale brown; segment 3 slender, apparently with a single baso-mesal capitate sensilla; palpal ratio 4.00. Thorax: Scutum dark brown, humeral areas and lateral margins yellowish; scutellum yellow, extreme margins brownish, with 6 large setae, 2 smaller anterocentral setae; postscutellum medium dark brown; lateral, ventral sclerites golden brown. Femora medium brown; tibiae light brown; tarsomeres 1–4 pale, 5 light brown; claws equal-sized, nearly straight, each talon with inner basal seta and small inner tooth at 1/3 length, apices bent, tips bifid; hind tibial comb with 8 spines, 5–6 longest. Wing (Fig. 34) moderately broad, hyaline, with numerous short, fine macrotrichia; macrotrichia moderately dense on veins and membrane except on proximal portion of medius, cells r 3, m 1, distal portion of anal cell, dense on wing margin and anterior margin of r 3; radial cells obsolete; basal portion of medius poorly developed, reduced to about 35 lightly sclerotized very small circular bead-like sclerites; M 1 separate from basal portion of medius, not connected to M 2; anal lobe poorly developed; costa short, costal ratio 0.38–0.40 (x̄ =0.39, n=10); wing length 0.57–0.67 (0.61, n=10) mm, width 0.230.26 (0.24, n=10) mm. Halter stem brown, knob pale on extreme base, remainder appearing black, but likely whitish in life. Abdomen: Dark brown. Genitalia as in Figs. 35–36. Tergite 9 very broad at base, tapering progressively distally to rounded apex with an attached extended proctiger bearing apicolateral processes that are stout, conical, closely approximated, apices slightly divergent with single subapical seta; cerci poorly developed, apparently reduced to 2–3 very small raised tubercles on inner bases of apicolateral process, each bearing single short seta; sternite 9 short at base with narrow posterior extension that reaches base or onto proximal portion of aedeagus. Gonocoxite stout, 1.2–1.4X longer than broad, ventral and lateral surface with very long setae that are longest on distal half of lateral margin and apex, mesal surface with moderately dense shorter setae; gonostylus about 0.8 length of gonocoxite, proximal 1/4 broadest section, then tapering abruptly for short distance before expanding slightly at mid portion, distal 1/3 tapering slightly distally to rounded simple apex bearing pair of short subapical setae. Gonocoxal apodemes and paramere symmetrical, slender, heavily sclerotized, fused at mid-length, forming a long extension that extends to or beyond apex of aedeagus; basal apodeme broadest on extreme base, tapering gradually distally, bent 30̊ at distal 1/3, apex curved 90̊, fused with opposite apodeme; distomedian portion elongate, slender, extending to distal 2/3 of median portion of aedeagus. Aedeagus complex, composed of two sections; proximal portion a heavily sclerotized basal sclerite that is divided at midlength with a small basolateral tooth like projection, basal sclerite attached to more lightly sclerotized very long lateral arms, proximal section of lateral arm expanded, tapered on distal 1/4, bent 60̊ at midlength, distal half very slender basally, expanded on apical 3/4, scalpel-shaped with pointed tip with a very slender basal lobe that is partially detached and curved distally; distomedian portion moderately sclerotized, greatly elongate, vasiform, proximal 2/3 expanded, distal 1/3 tapered, slender with a flared tip. Female. Similar to males with the following notable sexual differences. Head (Fig. 37): dark brown. Eyes contiguous by the width of 2–4 ommatidia, with short dense inter-ommatidial pubescence as in males. Frontal sclerite elliptical, similar to males with a slender ventral extension that extends midway between bases of eyes. Antennal flagellum lighter brown, with relatively short flagellomeres 2–4 broader than long, 5–8 vasiform, becoming progressively longer, 9–12 more vasiform, 13 longest, more elongate; antennal ratio 0.73–0.82 (0.79, n=10); flagellum length 0.27–0.35 (0.31, n=10) mm. Clypeus with 4–6 pairs of long sub-marginal setae. Palpus (Fig. 37) light brown, segment 3 moderately long with 1–3 mesal, capitate sensillae; palpal ratio 2.17–3.80 (3.03, n=10). Thorax. Scutum yellowish to brown, with 2 large marginal and 3–4 large central setae. Femora light brown, tibiae usually paler, hind tibia palest; tarsomeres 1–4 pale, 5 light brown; hind tibial comb with 7 spines, 5–6 longest; hind tarsal ratio 1.88–2.10 (2.00, n=10). Wing (Fig. 38) moderately broad; membrane hyaline with dense long macrotrichia; radial cells obsolete, or, present as a single short suture; apices of costa, radius at a slightly oblique angle; fork of CuA 1 at level of or just anterior of apex of costa-radius; wing length 0.44–0.67 (0.56, n=10) mm; costal ratio 0.37–0.42 (0.41, n=9). Halter stem brown, knob white (appearing black in slide-mounted specimens). Abdomen. Dark brown, with sparse long setae. Sub-genital plate (Fig. 40) obscure in some specimens, anterior portion lightly sclerotized, semicircular; posterior portion more heavily sclerotized, narrowly attached to anterior portion, basal arms broad with a V-shaped notch; spermatheca (Fig. 39) large, length 0.020 –0.027 (0.24 mm, n=9), round, golden colored, shaped like a pin-cushion with very thick walls, and a short or elongate dorsal neck. Type Material. Holotype male, FLORIDA, Levy Co., Yankeetown, XI 1987, light trap with CO 2, coll: Alan Wilkening (FSCA); allotype female with same data except SW of Yankeetown, 15-X-2015, W. L. Grogan, Jr., Sweeping Solidago flowers nr. marsh (FSCA). Paratypes, 43 males, 25 females: 1 female with same data as allotype; 1 male, 1 female with same data except W of Yankeetown, 11-X-2014, Sweeping flowers in tidal marsh; 2 males, 1 female with same data except 27-X-2016, Sweeping vegetation near tidal marsh. Miami-Dade Co., Pinecrest Chapman Field, 17/ 23-XII-2014, H. Escobar, 26´Tall Suction Trap, 2 females; same data except 29-XII-2014 / 6-I-2014, 1 male; same data except 20/ 26-I-2015, 1 male; same data except 6/ 20-IV-2015, 3 males; same data except 20/ 27-IV-2015, 1 female; same data except 6/ 11-V-2015, 1 female; same data except 1–15-VI-2015, Suction Trap, 2 males; same data except 15–22-VI-2015, 1 female; same data except 29-VI/ 6-VII-2015, 2 males; same data except 13–20-VII-2015, 1 male; same data except 27-VII/ 3-VIII-2015, 1 female; same data except 17/ 24-VIII-2015, 1 male; same data except 8–14-IX-2015, 1 male; same data except 28-X/ 2-XI-2015, 2 males; same data except 30- X/ 7-XII-2015, 1 male; same data except 9/ 17-XII-2015, 1 male; same data except 15–21-XII-2015, 1 male, 1 female; same data except 28-XII-2015 / 5-I-2016, 3 males, 2 females; same data except 5–11-I-2016, 2 females; same data except 11–19-I-2016, 2 females; same data except 1–8-II-2016, 2 males, 1 female; same data except 8–15-II-2016, 1 male; same data except 22-II/ 1-III-2016, 4 males; same data except 1–7-III-2016, 1 male, 1 female; same data except 7–14-III-2016, 1 female; same data except 14–21-III-2016, 3 males; same data except 4–11-IV-2016, 1 female; same data except 5–11-VII-2016, 1 female; same data except 19–26-IX-2016, 1 female; same data except 21–28-XI-2016, 1 female; same data except 21–28-III-2016, 1 male; same data except 28-III/ 4-IV-2016, 1 male; same data except 19–27-XII-2016, 1 female; same data except 10–17-I-2017, 1 female; same data except 13–20-II-2017, 2 males, 1 female; same data except 20–27-II-2017, 1 male; same data except 27-III/ 3-IV-2017, 1 male; same data except 17-XII-2018 / 8-1-2019, 1 male, 1 female; same data except 14–21-I-2019, 1 male; same data except 2–8-I-2020, 1 female; same data except 23–29-I-2020, 1 male, 1 female; same data except 10–17-II-2021, 1 female; same data except 17–24-II-2021, 1 male. Collier Co., Immokalee, 23–30-XII-2020, Scott Croxton, Suction Trap, 1 male. Paratypes are deposited in the USNM; the Canadian National Collection, Ottawa (CNCI); Museo de La Plata, Argentina (MLPA); and, the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District, Marathon (FLKC). Etymology. We dedicate this new species to Alan Wilkening, who collected

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,890
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0960,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,165 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyTravaux en français237 207